• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What is Nero's beef with Kirk?

I'm guessing Nero does not have a premeditated plan to kill Kirk, it's just collateral damage that changes the timeline, especially when you consider how Nero's ship goes back in time and where it first ends up, I'm betting that George Kirk on the USS Kelvin is just a coincidence.

Yeah, I get a feeling, call it a "hunch," that Nero's ship just goes too far back in time and the Kelvin is just an accident.
 
Nero's beef is due to the fact that Vulcan and Romulus are very close to reunification. Nero is a rogue faction of romulus who beleives that this reunification will destroy the romulans, and is not acting on behalf of the romulan government. As Spock (from that TNG ep) is pretty much directly responsible for reunification Nero has it in for him. By killing kirk as well he has killed the man responsible for alot of the recent political history of the federation. Nero beleives that by killing kirk, romulans would become the supreme power of the alpha quadrant. One of Neros aids early on in the movie asks why they do not attack archer instead, Nero says that archer was responsible for a lot of the militarization of romulas before during and after the romulan war, and would change romulan history too much.


Already seen the movie, eh?

No, he's trying to convince us that he's somehow involved with the production of the movie, or knows someone who is, when his poor grammar, punctuation and spelling isn't convincing us of that at all. I remember the poster "Matt" trying to do the same thing many months ago, and I believe he got banned for it. Just a word to the wise, Boz...
 
Nero's beef is due to the fact that Vulcan and Romulus are very close to reunification. Nero is a rogue faction of romulus who beleives that this reunification will destroy the romulans, and is not acting on behalf of the romulan government. As Spock (from that TNG ep) is pretty much directly responsible for reunification Nero has it in for him. By killing kirk as well he has killed the man responsible for alot of the recent political history of the federation. Nero beleives that by killing kirk, romulans would become the supreme power of the alpha quadrant. One of Neros aids early on in the movie asks why they do not attack archer instead, Nero says that archer was responsible for a lot of the militarization of romulas before during and after the romulan war, and would change romulan history too much.

Already seen the movie, eh?

No, he's trying to convince us that he's somehow involved with the production of the movie, or knows someone who is, when his poor grammar, punctuation and spelling isn't convincing us of that at all. I remember the poster "Matt" trying to do the same thing many months ago, and I believe he got banned for it. Just a word to the wise, Boz...
There have been at least a couple of posters claiming inside information (or seemingly wanting us to think that they have some) but none of them were Matt and (to my knowledge) no one has been banned for anything of the sort. All such information not issued by someone known to be part of the production should be taken with an appropriate degree of skepticism and nothing more.
 
Top 10 reasons why Nero has a beef with Kirk:

10. Drank the last gulp of milk and left the empty carton in the refridgerator.

9. Dutch Oven

8. Horded all the good toupees.

7. Kept leaving the seat up.

6. Kept stealing all the good lines.


5. Cockblocked him one too many times at the company Christmas party.

4. Couldn't keep his hands to himself around the Mrs.


3. Kept calling him "old Baldie" around the ladies in public

2. Left a floater and wouldn't flush for days..


and Number one reason why Nero has a beef with Kirk:


Buttafucco, Buttafucco, Buttafucco!!!
 
Already seen the movie, eh?

No, he's trying to convince us that he's somehow involved with the production of the movie, or knows someone who is, when his poor grammar, punctuation and spelling isn't convincing us of that at all. I remember the poster "Matt" trying to do the same thing many months ago, and I believe he got banned for it. Just a word to the wise, Boz...
There have been at least a couple of posters claiming inside information (or seemingly wanting us to think that they have some) but none of them were Matt and (to my knowledge) no one has been banned for anything of the sort. All such information not issued by someone known to be part of the production should be taken with an appropriate degree of skepticism and nothing more.

I think it was "MattJC," not "Matt." Sorry for the confusion, but if he didn't get banned anyway, it doesn't matter.
 
Assuming the plot rumor about Nero killing Kirk's parents (or at least his father) is correct, how do we know that these specific deaths were premeditation on Nero's part? Perhaps George Kirk's death is just the "collateral damage" of some otherwise unconnected scheme of Nero.

That's my take. I'm hoping that Nero is somewhere between reckless and psychotic, and he's just running around fucking shit up because he can. Sort of like Doomsday in the Superman comics (before they overexplained and ruined his origin).

It just makes no sense for him to go all the way back to Kirk's time and try to eliminate him. Even if he is somehow pissed about something Kirk has done, eliminating Kirk would have so many unpredictable effects by Nero's time, that no reasonable man would try it.

There could be an emotional connection to Kirk, like with Khan, but Nero seems too remote from Kirk, time-wise.

So, I hope he's just reckless, like Lobo, or just plain old frakkin' crazy.

To hell with these "evil genius" and "grand plan" plots. I, too hope Nero is doing these things without a lot of thought about the consequences. Pure mayhem. Pure badass. Kirk to Nero, "What are you rebelling against?" Nero, "Whadda ya got?"

I think it would be interesting to have a villain who goes around destroying things either because he is bored or just for the hell of it.
 
Pure fun speculation, which I'm sure will bear no relation to the actual film:

Nero's a hardass Romulan patriot watching his beloved Star Empire grow further defanged in the wake of post-Nemesis events (and belongs to an organization of such, which is where the tattoos come from). In his worldview, the Romulan Empire almost swept to glory after inventing the cloaking device, and would have, had James T. Kirk and the Enterprise not blunted its vanguard in "Balance of Terror." So he goes back to kill Kirk and/or destroy the Enterprise before those events. He overshoots a bit, hence the Kelvin incident and the long wait. The attack on Vulcan, and perhaps other attacks we don't yet know about, is specifically a method of drawing out the Enterprise and Kirk. Nero doesn't know that any one attack will attract them, but he figures that at some point Kirk's personality will out--and meanwhile Nero can happily knock off Federation and Klingon materiel in mass quantities with his Super Octopus.

What Nero doesn't know is that Old Spock, who knows Nero's plan and follows him back, has a deeply personal stake in the matter--which isn't his friendship with Kirk. During "Balance of Terror," Spock's was the deciding voice urging Kirk to attack the Romulan ship, rather than let it escape. Though he knows it's illogical, the human side of Spock has always felt guilty about that, feeling that all the subsequent bloodshed between the Romulans and the Federation is, at some level, his responsibility. That's part of why he pursued Vulcan/Romulan reunification so passionately; and it's an additional spur to his wanting to prevent Nero from making things even worse, even in a timeline which is not his own.

(Because he does know that he's leaving his own timeline, never to return. In the Classic Trek Timeline, Spock disappears into myth and legend.)
 
From what I understand, Nero is an extreme nationalist. He wants a future where the Romulans are the dominant power. I would also assume that following Nemesis, there may have been a renewed push towards reunification as a result of the power vacuum.

As for his "beef" with Kirk, I don't think its anything personal, but a chance to eliminate a person who had an extraordinary role in shaping the events of
the late 23rd century and beyond. Take out Patton or Napoleon and we may be living in a much different world.
 
Just don't make Nofee angry!

negotiator.jpg
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top