There are 50,000 unreleased movies available on Netflix? Wow!
I'm guessing Nero does not have a premeditated plan to kill Kirk, it's just collateral damage that changes the timeline, especially when you consider how Nero's ship goes back in time and where it first ends up, I'm betting that George Kirk on the USS Kelvin is just a coincidence.
Nero's beef is due to the fact that Vulcan and Romulus are very close to reunification. Nero is a rogue faction of romulus who beleives that this reunification will destroy the romulans, and is not acting on behalf of the romulan government. As Spock (from that TNG ep) is pretty much directly responsible for reunification Nero has it in for him. By killing kirk as well he has killed the man responsible for alot of the recent political history of the federation. Nero beleives that by killing kirk, romulans would become the supreme power of the alpha quadrant. One of Neros aids early on in the movie asks why they do not attack archer instead, Nero says that archer was responsible for a lot of the militarization of romulas before during and after the romulan war, and would change romulan history too much.
Already seen the movie, eh?
So, despite all the ranting so far, the simple fact is...we have no idea what this movie is about. One more reason to watch it come may.
Based on this logic, I just loaded up my Netflix queue with 50,000 movies.
There have been at least a couple of posters claiming inside information (or seemingly wanting us to think that they have some) but none of them were Matt and (to my knowledge) no one has been banned for anything of the sort. All such information not issued by someone known to be part of the production should be taken with an appropriate degree of skepticism and nothing more.Nero's beef is due to the fact that Vulcan and Romulus are very close to reunification. Nero is a rogue faction of romulus who beleives that this reunification will destroy the romulans, and is not acting on behalf of the romulan government. As Spock (from that TNG ep) is pretty much directly responsible for reunification Nero has it in for him. By killing kirk as well he has killed the man responsible for alot of the recent political history of the federation. Nero beleives that by killing kirk, romulans would become the supreme power of the alpha quadrant. One of Neros aids early on in the movie asks why they do not attack archer instead, Nero says that archer was responsible for a lot of the militarization of romulas before during and after the romulan war, and would change romulan history too much.
Already seen the movie, eh?
No, he's trying to convince us that he's somehow involved with the production of the movie, or knows someone who is, when his poor grammar, punctuation and spelling isn't convincing us of that at all. I remember the poster "Matt" trying to do the same thing many months ago, and I believe he got banned for it. Just a word to the wise, Boz...
The internet does!
Not a fan, huh?![]()
Daniel Craig IS James T. Kirk in: Quantum of Theory...at theatres everywhere this May!Not sure how you got from point A to point B on that one. I'll chalk that non sequitur up to quantum theory.
There have been at least a couple of posters claiming inside information (or seemingly wanting us to think that they have some) but none of them were Matt and (to my knowledge) no one has been banned for anything of the sort. All such information not issued by someone known to be part of the production should be taken with an appropriate degree of skepticism and nothing more.Already seen the movie, eh?
No, he's trying to convince us that he's somehow involved with the production of the movie, or knows someone who is, when his poor grammar, punctuation and spelling isn't convincing us of that at all. I remember the poster "Matt" trying to do the same thing many months ago, and I believe he got banned for it. Just a word to the wise, Boz...
Assuming the plot rumor about Nero killing Kirk's parents (or at least his father) is correct, how do we know that these specific deaths were premeditation on Nero's part? Perhaps George Kirk's death is just the "collateral damage" of some otherwise unconnected scheme of Nero.
That's my take. I'm hoping that Nero is somewhere between reckless and psychotic, and he's just running around fucking shit up because he can. Sort of like Doomsday in the Superman comics (before they overexplained and ruined his origin).
It just makes no sense for him to go all the way back to Kirk's time and try to eliminate him. Even if he is somehow pissed about something Kirk has done, eliminating Kirk would have so many unpredictable effects by Nero's time, that no reasonable man would try it.
There could be an emotional connection to Kirk, like with Khan, but Nero seems too remote from Kirk, time-wise.
So, I hope he's just reckless, like Lobo, or just plain old frakkin' crazy.
To hell with these "evil genius" and "grand plan" plots. I, too hope Nero is doing these things without a lot of thought about the consequences. Pure mayhem. Pure badass. Kirk to Nero, "What are you rebelling against?" Nero, "Whadda ya got?"
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.