I don't care for slasher movies, unless you count Psycho. I was ambivalent about Hammer Films when I was a kid, but I started getting into them about five years ago.I'm pretty much imune to gore - I just find it a bit pathetic. I dont like slasher movies but thought Scream subjverted the genre nicely. Stuff like Hellraiser bores the pants off me and I found The Exorcist a bit dull. Much to Mrs Relayers disgust, I hate old Hammer films. I'm not a good target audience for horror.
That was indeed the plan at the time, but Halloween III didn't do so well. I kind of liked it, mainly for Stacey Nelkin.Carpenter recently did an interview (I can't recall what site I read it on) where he said the plan was to make the Halloween series an anthology, with different characters and unrelated stories in each film, released under the Halloween banner (after Halloween II, of course). Maybe the commercial was inserted as a reinforcement of this anthology design.
Which one?Technically Halloween ended yesterday here, but I decided to give myself the loophole that there was still a few hours left in the US. So I got up this morning and put on ' The Dunwich Horror'.
I won't be watching any.
Which one?Technically Halloween ended yesterday here, but I decided to give myself the loophole that there was still a few hours left in the US. So I got up this morning and put on ' The Dunwich Horror'.
Which one?Technically Halloween ended yesterday here, but I decided to give myself the loophole that there was still a few hours left in the US. So I got up this morning and put on ' The Dunwich Horror'.
The Corman one with Sandra Dee. I have seen the other one, and Corman's is the better version. It's just unlike the most of his Poe movies that I was watching yesterday, 'Dunwich...' has aged pretty badly.
It is fun if you're in the mood. But it's probably a bad idea to show it to any hard-core Lovecraft fans.
I've seen it, and I find it entertaining (especially the idea of Sandra Dee, of all people, almost getting naked), but it is pretty bad. It's not that it hasn't aged well, either, because it was pretty bad at the time. That sort of amateur-film-school-directing-masquerading-as-artsy was fashionable for a while in the 70s. It dragged down Night Gallery, too, among other things.Which one?Technically Halloween ended yesterday here, but I decided to give myself the loophole that there was still a few hours left in the US. So I got up this morning and put on ' The Dunwich Horror'.
The Corman one with Sandra Dee. I have seen the other one, and Corman's is the better version. It's just unlike the most of his Poe movies that I was watching yesterday, 'Dunwich...' has aged pretty badly.
It is fun if you're in the mood. But it's probably a bad idea to show it to any hard-core Lovecraft fans.
Whisperer In Darkness by the Lovecraft Historical Society? That was great. They also did a silent film version of Call Of Cthulhu that I love. And they have a bunch of OTR-style "audio adventures" of some of his other works.My biggest 'WTF?' moment was "Is that Dean Stockwell? And is he playing WILBUR?!' But yeah, it's a good-bad movie.
I've seen Dagon, and it's pretty good (the skinning scene is just disturbing) even if I never could work out why they picked that title. I've got Re-animator, Whisperer in Darkness, Castle Freak and From Beyond as well, so maybe next year I'll marathon Lovecraft instead of Poe.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.