I don't really want any section 31 stuff, I'm a huge DS9 fan but I think they went unknown for so long for a reason.
I'm in agreement here. Section 31 needs to be contained to DS9.
I don't really want any section 31 stuff, I'm a huge DS9 fan but I think they went unknown for so long for a reason.
More of the Jerry Goldsmith theme..
Yeah, the First Contact theme WOULD be great.
That's fine really, but I think it should be DS9 only who knows about them. I like some ideas like Pegasus/Admiral Locke being involved with them, but it starts to get ridiculous when almost every dodgy thing Starfleet has done is S31. Only reason DS9 knew them was Bashir.
Kirk: *Vulcan Salute* How many fingers am I holding up?
McCoy: That's not very damn funny.
...
Although I do have an issue with Section 31 itself. The good guys have a secret club that dabbles in genocide? It's stupid. Like if Captain America were seen shooting up on heroin in a brothel in The Avengers.
Kirk Prime had some dealings with Section 31 in the novels, so I've got no problem with him becoming aware of them in the alternate reality.
Although I do have an issue with Section 31 itself. The good guys have a secret club that dabbles in genocide? It's stupid. Like if Captain America were seen shooting up on heroin in a brothel in The Avengers.
To be fair, the Trek Lit authors really came up with the whole "Section 31 is involved in all sorts of foolhardy and unethical things on a grand scale for little to no reason" when DS9 was just "Section 31 is doing ethically questionable things to benefit the Federation in the long term." Hell, Section 31's goals and thought processes were certainly a lot more comprehensible than Starfleet's in DS9, given that a decent chunk of DS9 revolved around the repercussions of an incredibly stupid treaty Starfleet was enforcing....
Although I do have an issue with Section 31 itself. The good guys have a secret club that dabbles in genocide? It's stupid. Like if Captain America were seen shooting up on heroin in a brothel in The Avengers.
I couldn't agree with you more. It was probably just some sort of childish modern rebellion against TOS's and particularly TNG's more up-beat view of the future.
To be fair, the Trek Lit authors really came up with the whole "Section 31 is involved in all sorts of foolhardy and unethical things on a grand scale for little to no reason" when DS9 was just "Section 31 is doing ethically questionable things to benefit the Federation in the long term." Hell, Section 31's goals and thought processes were certainly a lot more comprehensible than Starfleet's in DS9, given that a decent chunk of DS9 revolved around the repercussions of an incredibly stupid treaty Starfleet was enforcing.
By coincidence, I just saw this in TrekMovie's Twitter feed:That green wrap around uniform variant !!!
TrekMovie.com said:Q: @RDPomin: @TrekMovie Will Kirk wear a green Command shirt in the movie?
A: This was asked at @bad_robot visit day, answer was 'no'
By coincidence, I just saw this in TrekMovie's Twitter feed:That green wrap around uniform variant !!!
While that's not a "never," it looks as though you won't be seeing it this time.TrekMovie.com said:Q: @RDPomin: @TrekMovie Will Kirk wear a green Command shirt in the movie?
A: This was asked at @bad_robot visit day, answer was 'no'
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.