• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What has the new series done to ruin Star Trek this time?

It now does in the TNG HD remaster.

13f-thenakednow-r.jpg
FTFU
TQ2qdgr.jpeg
 
Remember when we just watched this stuff for fun?
Are the characters being affected by basic laws of physics like gravity? - Check!
Do the actors all have their makeup and pants on? - Check!
Does the fabricated reality of the fictional universe align with how it was presented in the past? - Check!

Fun can now commence.

Edit: I understand that pants aren't required in literally every scene I was just making a point.
 
I think the only way to avoid all problems with canon, context and constancy would have been to make just one series from the beginnings in the 60s until today.
Somehow an interesting idea I think but quite unrealistic.
So we have to allow some inconstancy.
The keystones are still there.
 
I really wanted to like SNW, and did, early on. Then, we got the Xenomorph Gorn, Kirk being there all the time, the weird season finale, and I just kinda moved on. They laid the nostalgia on so thick, that it feels like they're winking at me. That and I really enjoyed Anson Mount's run on Hell on Wheels. To the point that I treat Cullen Bohannon as an ancestor of Christopher Pike.

Just one of those things where you can't go home again.

Picard Season 3 had a ton of nostalgia. But the difference was ....they are the same actors and it's continuing the Berman universe. I personally think two prequel series were a bad idea. I wish they had moved Trek Forward instead of back and then they go 900 years into the future. 😂 That was not the way forward I would have chosen. But as I said before there was some stuff to like in Discovery. Sadly it looks like Kurtzman is not going to get off this turbolift coaster anytime soon. . He's only digging his heels in further. Now they are going to stick the Doctor from Voyager into Academy... 😢
 
I think the only way to avoid all problems with canon, context and constancy would have been to make just one series from the beginnings in the 60s until today.
Somehow an interesting idea I think but quite unrealistic.
So we have to allow some inconstancy.
The keystones are still there.
Exactly. This is art not history.

The key components are there while committing the number one rule of Trek.
 
Exactly. This is art not history.

The key components are there while committing the number one rule of Trek.

But it's art that has it's own history . In that regards it should be respected on some level. There will be errors, there will be the occasional retcon but a complete rewrite which is basically happening right now was not necessary. At this point there are only key elements as you call them in the show....Enterprise, Pike, Every TOS character almost and yellow, blue and red shirts. 😂
 
But it's art that has it's own history . In that regards it should be respected on some level.
To me, it's changing things that honestly don't need to be changed to have a dramatic impact.

The people in charge seem to take the view that depicting the TOS era needed modern sensibilities to work. And that ranged from a total reworking of the visuals when Discovery started (e.g., Star Wars-like holograms, complete redesign of the Klingons to make them more "alien," etc.) into a more subtle facelift with Strange New Worlds that's basically within the ballpark of TOS, but still takes some broad shifts at points, like with the Gorn.

And the word for a lot of it I would use is "unnecessary." We're watching Star Trek. People wouldn't watch it or give it a chance if they weren't already inclined to buy in a little bit to the idea of a six-decade old media franchise. So do I think they get one more viewer than they would have by giving the Pike's Enterprise swept back pylons instead of straight ones? No. Do I think they get more viewers by putting Khan in 2020s Toronto instead of letting him just be a 1990s dictator? No.

But you know what you do get when the fans of the IP's history feel it's respected? EXCITEMENT!

What is the biggest movie of the summer? Deadpool & Wolverine. What is one of the biggest things fans of that movie love? They put Wolverine in his damn yellow suit that for years the people in charge of the X-Men movies thought was ridiculous for the X-Men. And, arguably, one of the biggest moments in that movie involves something that some dipshit executive at Fox for over 20 years thought wouldn't work on film working amazingly with the audience.

I think Star Trek sometimes is like that Fox executive and doesn't trust its audience to appreciate those kind of moments, and as long as the stories are strong people will go with it and love that people put in so much work to make it look the way it was. Instead, they put out all these alterations and the changes become distractions. They become the things people talk about instead of the stories.
 
But you know what you do get when the fans of the IP's history feel it's respected? EXCITEMENT!
Define respect.

I get so tired of being told this. I love a reference as much as the next fan but what gets my excitement up! Stories and characters!

Sorry, but I'm tired of being told the only thing that matters is the history. It's frustrating because some how history means more than the characters. At least, that's the impression I get from the constant haranguing over it and the supposed ruination of the franchise because it isn't built like the 60s, 80s or 2000s any more.

I don't feel respected if the character isn't there. I felt winked at and cheap.
 
Pfffsh, the filmed pilot went off the rails. The One And Only True Star Trek® is about the S.S. Yorktown (none of that "USS" stuff, thankyouverymuch) with the "skipper" Captain Robert M. April and the "probably half Martian" Mr. Spock with the Satanic face and reddish complexion. The best episodes by far were "A Question of Cannibalism" and "To Skin a Tyrannosaurus."

:shifty:

Kor

So this is before the timeline rewrite that rebooted Pike as the Captain back in the early 60s, then. Cool. ;)
 
To me, season 2's "Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow" was the breaking point. It's one of the dumbest episodes of Star Trek they've ever done.

And what compounds the stupidity is Akiva Goldsman's responses to questions about why they did it, and claiming that they needed Star Trek to still be a believable "aspirational" future. So they moved the Eugenics Wars and made Khan Canadian.

But everything else in that episode has the characters doing things that aren't believable within a modern context, which just makes it seem like those in charge can't see the forest for the trees.
  • How did they get a hotel room without any money? Chess hustling.
  • How did they get a hotel room in the modern day with no ID or credit card?????
  • How did they cross an international border with no passport or ID?????????
  • How did they not get detained after getting into a police chase in the middle of Toronto????????

It's like they want to take swings at the broad strokes of canon, but don't bother the details.

I thought I was the only one freaking out abuot the hotel rooms and the borders. It was so incredibly unbelievable. Fast travel all over the place, too. But, it was also.... the opposite of breaking point.

It was the moment that I felt vindication for my long-held belief that all of Nu-Trek is in a rewritten, post TOS timeline. First Contact, Enterprise, Temporal Cold War, Regeneration, and now T&T&T..... gives many, many reasons for multiple iterations of the timeline, thus fixing every error DSC and SNW, and even ENT have created.

It broke the illusion, but cemented the reboot, which is enough for me to stop complaining.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top