Well it doesn't contradict canon completely, a Klingon Mummification Glyph is mentioned in Star Trek 4, so it did occur at some point in their history.
Either way it still doesn't contradict anything.Hard to come to that conclusion based on one symbol name. The symbol could have meant to describe Klingon mummification by natural means rather than intentional means or the symbol is used by klingons to describe mummification of other aliens and that's just the word they used for something which they themselves do not adopt.
Incorrect. This is about demonstrating how Discovery is not Star Trek.I thought this was about whether or not Discovery added to Trek lore.
It's also hard to conclude that a species would only have one way of dealing with dead bodies.Hard to come to that conclusion based on one symbol name. The symbol could have meant to describe Klingon mummification by natural means rather than intentional means or the symbol is used by klingons to describe mummification of other aliens and that's just the word they used for something which they themselves do not adopt.
The pre-Discovery and post-Discovery Klingon cultures can contradict each other and still both be true. It was just Benny Russell messing up his story.Either way it still doesn't contradict anything.
Or, they could have more than one culture, and traditions and the like.The pre-Discovery and post-Discovery Klingon cultures can contradict each other and still both be true. It was just Benny Russell messing up his story.
That'd be absurd. It would be like every Vulcan wearing a bowl haircut. No one would be that culturally myopic.Or, they could have more than one culture, and traditions and the like.
Seriously. Is monoculturalism so iconoclastic in Star Trek that daring to show variety is abhorrent?![]()
If TOS and post-TOS Klingons can contradict each other and still be "true" without Benny's involvement, so can DISCO's.The pre-Discovery and post-Discovery Klingon cultures can contradict each other and still both be true. It was just Benny Russell messing up his story.
yeah it could be some kind of parallel universe or someone accidentally ran into one of Cosimos time streams again.If TOS and post-TOS Klingons can contradict each other and still be "true" without Benny'd involvement, so can DISCO's.
Or it's just TV shows and films made years apart.yeah it could be some kind of parallel universe or someone accidentally ran into one of Cosimos time streams again.
Only if it's DISCOVERY of course!Or, they could have more than one culture, and traditions and the like.
Seriously. Is monoculturalism so iconoclastic in Star Trek that daring to show variety is abhorrent?![]()
it's possible. Picard mentioned this possibility in "ship in a bottle". Continuity may not be a requirement for existence.Or it's just TV shows and films made years apart.
Nah, she's only half Klingon. ObviouslyAlso, does that mean B'Elanna Torres has two vaginas?
Obviously all aliens must be like humans...for reasons.What's so "wrong" about having a fictional alien have multiple sex organs? How would that diminish Worf's character?
What's so "wrong" about having a fictional alien have multiple sex organs? How would that diminish Worf's character?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.