It's amazing how sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.
I by no means am an "old games suck" type, on the contrary. I probably PRIMARILY play older games.
It's just, some are still 100% perfectly playable and enjoyable, some are not. '
It's odd though. Battlefront? Godawful (IMO). KOTOR? Still perfectly playable and enjoyable. 10/10.
For the longest time, I mostly played old titles. I had missed about a decade's worth of games from when I just wasn't gaming much at all and so went through a ton of them. It's never graphics and very rarely just combat that makes or breaks older games, imo. It's usually in QOL stuff where there was no tech reason to do something so stupid -- just a why the hell did you design it this way?! -- that breaks them. If I had to guess, they were original gripes for players even when the game was new but now that they're older graphics or gameplay doesn't make up for the level of annoyance.
Also, a great story or a world that I want to be in (made well enough that it really does feel like it could be real) will make up for a metric ton of sins in an older game -- at least for me.
ETA: And I still need to play KOTOR. Ironically, I bought it about a year and a half ago on the recommendation of a 20 year old.