Re: What do you think about the USS Vengeance ?
I like the USS Vengeance: as has been previously mentioned, I also think it was designed by Section 31 to be awe-inspiringly huge and visually intimidating, creating as much visual impact as possible through it's presence.
If it looked even remotely traditionally starfleet-eque, then it wasn't doing the job it was intended for: instilling overwhelming fear into it's enemies (by it's OTT size, weaponry, speed, etc...).
I don't even think it DIDN'T look "remotely" Starfleet-esque. A departure, sure, but I'm not seeing the hugely not-at-all-Starfleet (and, apparently, "evil") look to this ship that others are.
Yeah - I'd agree with that. It is a departure from NuTrek starfleet vessels, so I think it intended to be similar to the starfleet template (primary saucer, nacelles, engineering hull, etc), but also distinctly unlike anything we've seen previously (in the Abramsverse).
To me, it clearly looks like a battleship / dreadnaught, in style, weapons, appearance, etc - and it's upsized scale lends to it's intimidating appearance (when you compare to the size of the NCC 1701 and her other starfleet counterparts) - and this makes sense to me, based on being influenced (directly or indirectly) by the Narada incursion into the Abramsverse timeline.
I think it does it's job well, and pushes Starfleet design ethos in another, more interesting direction.
Personally speaking, I cant wait to get a HotWheels diecast of the USS Vengeance!
In my mind, if I were a Klingon with knowledge of what starfleet vessels generally looked like (broadly speaking), and I saw the USS Vengeance drop out of warp in front of me, at the very least, I'd be curious and surprised to see it (for a Klingon)!
Okay, now I'm on shaky ground (trying to extropolate on what a Klingon's POV might be...)
