Re: Kirk's impression, I'm just saying that when he thought Spock was touching him, there was nothing remotely sexual about it. Especially concerning the maker's intentions.
I just couldn't resist the reference.
I suppose it gets to the matter of what part of yourself you aren't seeing represented, a woman being independent versus a queer woman being in the world without being villainous or tragically doomed or an object of ridicule. Plus, the social dynamics of a same-sex pairing are very different from a heterosexual one; an incidental/imaginary lesbian relationship in the background is very different from the only female presence in a story being a Bond girl whose function is to titillate the audience and reward the male main character.Re: the Bechdel test, that origin is shocking. It would once again reduce women's place in the film to a mere sex-and-romance function, as much as any 1960s spy spoof ever did. Cool!
Perhaps the eventual INDEPENDENCE DAY remake might fulfill that requitement by using two femaliens.
Doesn't sound like something you'd see in an epic cinematic testosterone-fest.Perhaps the eventual INDEPENDENCE DAY remake might fulfill that requitement by using two femaliens.
Like Top Gun? That title wasn't referring solely to military positions or weapons.
They could also pull a temporary Tuvix with him, mixing him with other TOS regulars.
You can even get free shipping!
If I ever find a way to get paid for it, I'm on Easy Street.
Topgun is based right down the road from me. I'll ask.
Then I look forward toyourreply.
Literally, the real school is "Topgun", no space.Then I look forward toyourreply.
Aha. Evidently Paramount didn't want their 1986 minorpiece to be confused with an Eastern hemisphere film.
No idea what that's supposed to mean.Aha. Evidently Paramount didn't want their 1986 minorpiece to be confused with an Eastern hemisphere film.
