• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your top 3 Star Trek films?

What are your top 3 Star Trek films?

  • The Motion Picture

    Votes: 33 26.4%
  • The Wrath of Khan

    Votes: 71 56.8%
  • The Search for Spock

    Votes: 23 18.4%
  • The Voyage Home

    Votes: 53 42.4%
  • The Final Frontier

    Votes: 7 5.6%
  • The Undiscovered Country

    Votes: 57 45.6%
  • Generations

    Votes: 6 4.8%
  • First Contact

    Votes: 62 49.6%
  • Insurrection

    Votes: 4 3.2%
  • Nemesis

    Votes: 6 4.8%
  • Star Trek (2009)

    Votes: 17 13.6%
  • Into Darkness

    Votes: 9 7.2%
  • Beyond

    Votes: 15 12.0%

  • Total voters
    125
TMP, TUC, and Star Trek (2009). In that order.

I am surprised but delighted to see that TUC is ranked higher at the moment than FC, which I thought was more universally loved in TrekDom.
 
TVH, TWOK, TMP... probably in that order. That said, on my last rewatch I had a great time with Generations, so an honorable mention goes its way. Weirdly enough, among the TNG films, my favorities are GEN and NEM, far ahead of the other two. I'm very critical of FC.
 
TVH, TWOK, TMP... probably in that order. That said, on my last rewatch I had a great time with Generations, so an honorable mention goes its way. Weirdly enough, among the TNG films, my favorities are GEN and NEM, far ahead of the other two. I'm very critical of FC.
FC had gaping plot holes and poorly cast Zefram Cochrane.
 
WoK
TVH
FC

all in that order. If I were to make it a top 5, “Search for Spock” and “Beyond” would round it out. Beyond is just good enough to bump down Undiscovered Country.
 
My order changes depending on whether I'm in the mood for lighthearted or action. As well as who I'm watching Trek with. It's less fun to watch with either nitpickers (who complain a bit too much about plot holes &/or something not being valid science) or complete newbs who want EVERYTHING explained to them. I prefer & eagerly participate in a lively discussion AFTER the movie.
 
We'll, now I can't wait to get out of work & you watch Beyond (just saw it's ok Hulu!) Haven't seen that since it was out in theaters & the closed captioning device didn't work :brickwall: so I missed a lot of dialogue.
 
That is a fair statement, although I do not see "major" plot problems with TUC or TWOK.
I reckon the fact they make a big thing of finding a planet with no life, which is why they beam down to where Khan is, is a big plot hole, considering they just create a planet from nothing when genesis is blown up later.
 
I reckon the fact they make a big thing of finding a planet with no life, which is why they beam down to where Khan is, is a big plot hole, considering they just create a planet from nothing when genesis is blown up later.
My memory is hazy on their reasoning for going down to the planet because it has been years since I watched the film. What was their actual stated reasoning for going down to the planet's surface? To determine if it was a candidate for the genesis project? If so, I don't see a major plot hole there. Am I wrong?
 
My memory is hazy on their reasoning for going down to the planet because it has been years since I watched the film. What was their actual stated reasoning for going down to the planet's surface? To determine if it was a candidate for the genesis project? If so, I don't see a major plot hole there. Am I wrong?
yeah it was but as the actual genesis planet was created without the need for a host planet why did they need to go check it out?

They made a big deal about finding a planet without life when they didn't need a planet at all
 
yeah it was but as the actual genesis planet was created without the need for a host planet why did they need to go check it out?

They made a big deal about finding a planet without life when they didn't need a planet at all
But they didn't know that at the time. The nature of the planet create out of the Mutara nebula was pretty much an unintended consequence. The whole point of the Reliant expedition was to find an appropriate "dead" world, with no native life that would be killed in the test detonation. That a planet would be created by the Genesis effect from nothing was a random effect.
 
yeah it was but as the actual genesis planet was created without the need for a host planet why did they need to go check it out?

They made a big deal about finding a planet without life when they didn't need a planet at all
Was the actual Genesis planet "created?" I didn't recall that. I thought it was a dead planet that they turned into a "living" planet by throwing what Genesis is onto it?

Maybe they went down because they wanted to confirm there was nothing crawling around on the surface (which as it turns out had those creatures the put in certain characters ears). Maybe there is another reason we have not yet thought of. We are talking about a fictional time and place we can't really be sure about, and it seems like a pretty minor irregularity (if that is what it is).
 
Was the actual Genesis planet "created?" I didn't recall that. I thought it was a dead planet that they turned into a "living" planet by throwing what Genesis is onto it?
Yes, it was. There was no planet or planetary body around so the device used the matter from the Reliant and the Mutara Nebula to create the Genesis Planet.
 
Yes, it was. There was no planet or planetary body around so the device used the matter from the Reliant and the Mutara Nebula to create the Genesis Planet.
That is not the description of Genesis that was provided in Star Trek II, and it seems that it would require less energy to start with a lifeless planet anyway. This was the description of Genesis provided in Star Trek II, so it makes sense they would be on the look out out for a "dead" planet:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
That is not the description of Genesis that was provided in Star Trek II, and it seems that it would require less energy to start with a lifeless planet anyway. This was the description of Genesis provided in Star Trek II, so it makes sense they would be on the look out out for a "dead" planet:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Well, yes, but where did the planet come from at the end of the film?
 
That is not the description of Genesis that was provided in Star Trek II, and it seems that it would require less energy to start with a lifeless planet anyway. This was the description of Genesis provided in Star Trek II, so it makes sense they would be on the look out out for a "dead" planet:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
I've seen TWOK 100 Million Times. I practically wore out the video tape when I was a kid.

The Enterprise battles the Reliant in the Mutara Nebula where there's no planet. The Reliant explodes, then a planet forms where the Reliant was. What happened at the end of the film isn't consistent with what Carol described in her proposal.
 
Well, yes, but where did the planet come from at the end of the film?
If they created it from a nebula, I guess they chose a different route because that other planet didn't check out when they discovered it was carrying slugs that were shoved in people's ears? Just a theory. I think I need to watch TWOK again.
I've seen TWOK 100 Million Times. I practically wore out the video tape when I was a kid.

The Enterprise battles the Reliant in the Mutara Nebula where there's no planet. The Reliant explodes, then a planet forms where the Reliant was. What happened at the end of the film isn't consistent with what Carol described in her proposal.
It sounds like it was incidental though if it is due to a ship exploding and not something that was planned. Advise me on where any "plot holes" exist in TWOK. Would you describe the sequence of events you referenced as a "plot hole?"
 
It sounds like it was incidental though if it is due to a ship exploding and not something that was planned. Advise me on where any "plot holes" exist in TWOK. Would you describe the sequence of events you referenced as a "plot hole?"
You misunderstand. I'm just pointing out what it is. It doesn't make me like the film any less.

I can do it later, if you really want.
 
You misunderstand. I'm just pointing out what it is. It doesn't make me like the film any less.

I can do it later, if you really want.
Find "plot holes" later? That was really the basis of the discussion. It started with me trying to justify why they went down to the planet to check it out. Thus far, I don't see anything that constitutes a major "plot hole" in TWOK, but I am sure you are the guy to let me know if there is.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top