I think that's called "Stargate".What if the show is being delayed for a few months because they redesigned Discovery not to be a ship but just a big transporter platform?

I think that's called "Stargate".What if the show is being delayed for a few months because they redesigned Discovery not to be a ship but just a big transporter platform?
None of the ones I mentioned were mindscrews/illusion. McCoy, Scott and Spock were dead and brought back by super science.
Yes I know it was a Khanian in the cryotube. And the tube stopped Kirk's brain from dying. Barely dead and barely alive are pretty much the same thing. Like half a glass of water.
Why is this a problem? They now have a treatment for severe radiation sickness. ( I think they're curing it with shots by TNG's time) Again this is a problem, why? Of course you have to survive the cure, which seems to be pretty rough. But If you were barely dead I guess it doesn't matter
The regenerative properties of the Genesis process should also be a game changer ( Come get your new youthful body, gramps!) The advance medtech of the Shore Leave planet should also be a game changer. (massive chest trauma? No problem!) What about the anti aging serum from the Deadly Years? Geriatric no more!
Exactly so. Trek uses "magic tech" all the time, but Abrams' gets torn asunder for it because it uses different terminologyAlso, the spores used to regrow organs from "This Side of Paradise", and the transporter used to cure/de-age Pulaski in "Unnatural Selection".
All game changing tech in Star Trek is locked way in a vault apparently. That's why they aren't transwarp teleporting androids and holograms to the other side of the Galaxy
I generally like the new films. However, there's not a lot going on in them that needs to be understood!! They're not complex.It's really the inability of many fans to understand what's going on in the new films that speaks to some sort of cognitive dysfunction.
All the more reason for not totally missing the stuff that is there, then..I generally like the new films. However, there's not a lot going on in them that needs to be understood!! They're not complex.
Mr Awe
Pretty much where I land - when the new series was announced, I thought that we were most likely to get another Kirk /Spock reboot, this is probably the next best thing in my mind.
I'm not convinced that CBS All Access isn't going to be a disaster. I just hope that Discovery doesn't end up being a fall guy and the show can find a home with Netflix or some other partner if needed.Especially with the 13-episode, serialized format it'll follow. I know Star Trek has had serialized storytelling before (DS9, Enterprise season 3), but to do it in a modern way excites me. I'm skeptical about it being on CBS All Access, but beyond that, like I wrote before, totally stoked.
I knew it.We're in for trouble no matter what.![]()
It's some degree, but it isn't the cornerstone. The whole point of Star Trek was that humanity survived the constant threat of nuclear war and managed to come together.
Completely agree.
It often seemed like TPTB were trying too hard, perhaps out of a feeling of obligation, to try to bind all the shows together by attaching a laundry list of things to each episode or season to keep it in line with the greater whole--like, each season had a Rommie or Borg quota, or whatever. It was sort of a half-hearted attempt at world building through the pretense of continuity.
Yet all the shows were so insular and self-contained that it really didn't matter.
Take something like the Maquis. It was briefly introduced in one show, briefly established in another to be used in a third. However, its significance in the first two series was minimal at best, and it's actual impact on the third was so small, one could argue it wasn't even worth the effort. All to create some sort of false bridge connecting the three shows.
However, everything else (Cling-ots, Rommies, Borg, et all) were all portrayed very differently from series to series. They included them out of obligation but changed them to fit the needs/time/agenda. Some were changed so much that one can't help but wonder why they ever bothered maintaining the illusion of a single universe at all. And why this one wonders why Fuller continues to do it.
It was pretty paint by numbers. And by "excellent" do you mean cliched and trite and overly pretentious?
The acting wasn't bad, though.
No it isn't.
Yes it is.
No, it isn't.
Yes, it is.
You don't know that.
Yes I do.
You don't know that.
Yes, I do.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
Have I missed anything?
Well if the ratings start to go down I'm sure we'll see old T'Pol in a thong in Discovery's decon room.
False dichotomy, really. I'm sure there are more fans of both than fans of only one or the other.
My thought is this won't greatly resemble the Prime Universe I first encounterd in the late 1960's and I'm fine with that.
It will have to resemble it to some extent. Probably uniform design and some other touches. The thing is that it will be set in the Prime universe in which all the other universes branch off from. Yup.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.