• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your opinions regarding Star Trek that are, shall we say, unorthodox?

Then we also have conflicting death counts. Spock states 37 million in “Bread and Circuses” for WWIII while Riker quotes 600 million in First Contact.
 
Sci fi always causes itself problems getting too close to the present date, especially when too optimistic or pessimistic
That's likely why the classic era, whenever they are in or talk about 'the past' (late 20th/early 21st century), usually adds around 30 years or so to the date of an event.

(Such as the Bell Riots in DS9's "PAST TENSE" two-parter being in 2024, which was 30 years after the episode was produced. Or in "SPACE SEED", the Eugenics Wars of the 90s were about 30 years ahead of that episode's production.)

It's far enough ahead to seem like a somewhat plausible and realistic possibility, but close enough ahead to still make whatever messages the episode is trying to say to be relatable. (Bell Riots, for example.)
 
From a historical perspective, three centuries later, they are looked at as one continuous conflict.

Like asking when did WWII begin. The answer currently depends on where you are from and who's answering.

That's likely why the classic era, whenever they are in or talk about 'the past' (late 20th/early 21st century), usually adds around 30 years or so to the date of an event.

I read advice a long time ago that said when writing future sci fi stories that an author should pick when they want a story to take place and then add 100 years to that initial choice.
 
Last edited:
Like asking when did WWII begin. The answer currently depends on where you are from and who's answering.
True but that's at least like a 2 year range, not decades.
Then we also have conflicting death counts. Spock states 37 million in “Bread and Circuses” for WWIII while Riker quotes 600 million in First Contact.
Pike gives the number as 30% of Earth's population. So if WW3 were to start in the next few years as Star Trek occasionally implies, that's over 2 billion people.
 
Pike gives the number as 30% of Earth's population. So if WW3 were to start in the next few years as Star Trek occasionally implies, that's over 2 billion people.

So we get three different numbers from three different sources for a conflict that happens two to three centuries in its past.

For me, that is why it is just easier to treat it as a multiverse.
 
If we take the long view, the tracks for WWII were laid down with the Treaty of Versailles.
That would be a bit like saying the American Civil War started with Bleeding Kansas. Then again I once heard a pretty good argument for the entire cold war being World War III since there wasn't a single year of peace during it and the wars, with very rare exceptions like the air war in Korea, were done by proxies.
 
That would be a bit like saying the American Civil War started with Bleeding Kansas. Then again I once heard a pretty good argument for the entire cold war being World War III since there wasn't a single year of peace during it and the wars, with very rare exceptions like the air war in Korea, were done by proxies.

It would be interesting to see how historians several centuries down the road treat this particular era of history.
 
They could’ve split the difference if they were creative. That the Eugenics Wars happened from 1992-1996 but those wars were what led to WWIII in the 20whenevers. That issues and flashpoints bubbled under the surface and then exploded into a nuclear conflict.

From a historical perspective, three centuries later, they are looked at as one continuous conflict.
Sort of the way there's about a half century of the Roman Empire in the 200's called Crisis of the 3rd Century but its multiple, often repeated incidents. Or for that matter the 100 Years War which wasn't always being actively fought.
Some historians place the start of WWII at the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931.
And technically didn't really end until 1956 when the Soviet Union and Japan were officially at peace, though no actual peace treaty between them has ever been signed. And of course the Netherlands and the Isles of Scilly signed a peace treaty in 1984 after 350 years of brutal war.
 
Some historians place the start of WWII at the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931.

I know that in my book on the history and development of aircraft carriers, written in 1969, the authors say that, while war officially broke out in the East in 1939, the seeds of World War II were planted in the West with the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931; and the book was written only 24 years after the end of World War II and 38 years after the invasion of Manchuria.
So, there were some historians even as early as 1969 saying the dates need to be examined.
 
Some historians place the start of WWII at the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931.

I know that in my book on the history and development of aircraft carriers, written in 1969, the authors say that, while war officially broke out in the East in 1939, the seeds of World War II were planted in the West with the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931; and the book was written only 24 years after the end of World War II and 38 years after the invasion of Manchuria.
So, there were some historians even as early as 1969 saying the dates need to be examined.
IMO, you both are right. Epic History has a great series on the lead-up to it. Darren, which book was that?

 
Last edited:
General Foch said Versailles was merely a 20 year armistice (paraphrased)

IMO, Gavrilo Princip shares some of the responsibility for Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

I can think of two authors, one being H.G. Wells, who wrote 'The Shape of Things to Come', who predicted a second great conflict about twenty years after World War I.

Wells had it starting in 1938, and the second author 1940, and he got the flashpoint right, Poland.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top