What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?
- Thread starter Amasov
- Start date
And cookies!
Don't forget the Marshmallow to make some Smores.
MarshMELONS.
Which Marsh?
Which MELONS?
It's a puerile and formulaic kiddie show where most of the episodes involve kids in SF uniforms using various devices to knock different kinds of asteroids out of the sky that are coming right for them. One of the asteroids (not kidding) was a big snot ball. Another was a popcorn kernel, and so on. It makes shows like Bubble Guppies and Paw Patrol look Shakespearean by comparison.
MA has a page about it and TrekMovie.com has excerpts from every episode. There are (of course) always some folks out there trying to shoehorn it into Teh Canonz™ but ... y'know ...
This thread is not a dream.
i just watched three episodes. i am insulted. the part of me that would have loved to see something star trek on nick jr back when i was the correct age for nick jr. is insulted.
based on the name, i would have assumed Scouts was about young children learning skills like idk orienteering or identifying animals or building simple machines or something, with a Trek spin.
the descriptions even try to pretend they are learning engineering skills and putting them to the test. but no. not at all. they just use a goddamned speak-n-spell to pick from absolutely random objects and the first one is wrong, and then the second one isn't and tadah.
formulaic is the wrong word. it's too rigidly the same for that. formulaic still allows for some individuality, some...thingonthewing.
i feel bad for the animators and modelers. you can see they've clearly crafted more there, in brief glimpses. a whole little complex. but the "writers" ... i have never ever seen anything that felt more paint-by-numbers and creatively dead.
just give the kids the polliwog back or something.
jesus christ.
based on the name, i would have assumed Scouts was about young children learning skills like idk orienteering or identifying animals or building simple machines or something, with a Trek spin.
the descriptions even try to pretend they are learning engineering skills and putting them to the test. but no. not at all. they just use a goddamned speak-n-spell to pick from absolutely random objects and the first one is wrong, and then the second one isn't and tadah.
formulaic is the wrong word. it's too rigidly the same for that. formulaic still allows for some individuality, some...thingonthewing.
i feel bad for the animators and modelers. you can see they've clearly crafted more there, in brief glimpses. a whole little complex. but the "writers" ... i have never ever seen anything that felt more paint-by-numbers and creatively dead.
just give the kids the polliwog back or something.
jesus christ.
This is no fantasy, no careless product of wild imagination.
There there.
That's why I also used the word "puerile": as in, childishly silly and trivial.
And it's a cool-sounding word.
Kneel before us!!
If I can make Orville official Trek then anything is possible. Remember if all else fells you can always pull out a Q card to explain multiple contradictions. .
I only kneel before a dominatrix! And naturally as we all should, the all mighty and perfect Terry Matales!
Where's the MIB (Men In Black) Neuralyzer when you need it.
What fell?
Row, row row your boat
Gently down the stream
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily
Life is...real. Totally real.
Star Trek: Scouts ðâï¸
Meet the Star Trek Scouts! JR, Roo, and Sprocket are three best friends training to become future Starfleet explorers! Join their adventures as they blast as...
youtube.com
Similar threads
