Don't see what's especially 70's about it besides Bones's open collar.And TMP was extremely 70s.
Don't see what's especially 70's about it besides Bones's open collar.And TMP was extremely 70s.
Well their was also the bell bottoms.
That would be a weird name.Okay so we all have weird names.
Star Trek?
![]()
It's mostly the brown and beige tones.Don't see what's especially 70's about it besides Bones's open collar.
Only about half.Don't people still use wits today?
FTFYDon't see what's especially 70's about it besides Bones's spectacular open collar.
The 70's ruled, arguably the greatest pop culture decade.And it’s general shittiness.
That also applies to '60s Trek. TOS uniforms had bigger flares than a nighttime 18-wheeler wreck on an Interstate.Well their was also the bell bottoms.
But enough about Washington, D.C.Only about half.
We never saw Kirk like we did when he reacted to the death of his son. That was a raw moment, well executed I thought, and a very emotional lead-in to blowing up the Enterprise.The best movie acting performances are in The Search For Spock, especially that of William Shatner.
Incorrect. The greatest pop culture decade was unarguably the 80's.The 70's ruled, arguably the greatest pop culture decade.
Shatner's a formidable and incredible actor when he wants to be. He never gets enough credit.We never saw Kirk like we did when he reacted to the death of his son. That was a raw moment, well executed I thought, and a very emotional lead-in to blowing up the Enterprise.
Star Trek is very much about "The People". Exploration and research is just away to introduce people into dramatic situations. And not necessarily "realistic" ones.The real problem with 'Star Trek ', is that it is about exploration and research. Not necessarily the People. Why? Realistically if we were watching the actual people do you think that the dialog would be any were near what it is?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.