• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

Stubbs-type science experiments, NASA-type science observations — these are more NOAA than USN. (I could believe the Navy might do some, but you’ll never have a cruiser or littoral combat ship spend three years off observing sea phenomena.)

The Excelsior spent three years cataloguing gaseous anomalies.
 
Various militaries at various times on Earth have conducted exploratory expeditons, charting expeditions, have had bases in other parts of the world conducting experiments or digs. (Or at the very least was involved with them.)

They also provide relief aid and humanitarian missions.

When not fighting a war, the military does pretty much the Earth equivalent of what Starfleet does. But during wartime, the military fights. Just like Starfleet.

Hence, Starfleet is a military.


It honestly seems, based on observations, that whether people consider Starfleet a military or not relies mostly on that person's perception of a military. (Basically, if they look at a military as a good or bad thing.) Despite the overwhelming evidence showing that Starfleet is a military.
 
Well...I will take your word for it because going from lacking intelligence to making movies is not a connection I would make.
He's a genius. Now whoever wrote that the Federation is an armada? That person is a moron.

"Some ideas are so stupid only intellectuals believe them." George Orwell

And whoever came up with whatever the heck the "Resistance" is probably isn't too bright either. (You can't be the plucky underdog if you're the Galactic Government.)
 
He's a genius. Now whoever wrote that the Federation is an armada? That person is a moron.

"Some ideas are so stupid only intellectuals believe them." George Orwell

And whoever came up with whatever the heck the "Resistance" is probably isn't too bright either. (You can't be the plucky underdog if you're the Galactic Government.)
Whatever you say, boss.
 
Exactly! A distinctly non-military mission, despite Excelsior plainly being a capable warship. So: a military that also does non-military stuff.

Or, a great cover story for an extended spy mission! :lol: :shifty:

No, seriously, in VOY "Flashback", we learn that Excelsior getting damaged in a fight with the Klingons was logged as an encounter with a "gaseous anomaly." Being on a survey mission was the excuse offered to Kang to be in the nebula outside of Federation space. :cool:

It makes me wonder whether all of the other events logged as involving gaseous anomalies were legit. :techman:
 
Or, a great cover story for an extended spy mission! :lol: :shifty:

No, seriously, in VOY "Flashback", we learn that Excelsior getting damaged in a fight with the Klingons was logged as an encounter with a "gaseous anomaly." Being on a survey mission was the excuse offered to Kang to be in the nebula outside of Federation space. :cool:

It makes me wonder whether all of the other events logged as involving gaseous anomalies were legit. :techman:

I always hated that. I hate that need to try and make something seem more important than it really was. In my head, they were simply doing their jobs. Not every mission is going to be the most exciting ever.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top