• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers We now have Ship Class names for BotBS

DN62jATW0AEo1-8.jpg


"U.S.S. Gagarin NCC-1309 Shepard class"

CmKhGX8.jpg
 
Except you cannot conclude the number of ships from those registries.

And that's exactly what I mean. Until now, apart perhaps from NCC-1017, there has been no reason not to think that registries would be consecutive and a good way to conclude the number of ships. It's only now that we get those closely spaced classes in the 1600 range that force us to choose.

Loving the plain looks of the Gagarin. Also, since they seem to insist on making the phaser turrets glow red, we can now see that the science ship Discovery outguns this class somewhat, with six pairs of emitters per saucer side rather than four. But what the Gagarin lacks in firepower she makes up in the lack of portholes. All business?

Timo Saloniemi
 
As far as I can tell, the Discovery is the only ship in the fleet with blue bussard collectors.

I wonder why.
 
As far as I can tell, the Discovery is the only ship in the fleet with blue bussard collectors.

I wonder why.
USS Europa also has blue bussards. Technically shown as more whitish but that has more to do with a change in VFX from the pilot to the running show.
 
Huh? Who goes to a movie exclusively for the ship? I'd think movie audiences would care more about whether they could see Patrick Stewart, Brent Spiner, etc. than whether they could see a model spaceship. I'm not convinced this was their actual reasoning.

If this was, indeed, their reasoning, it goes a long way to explain why the TNG movies saw such a drop in quality and how the franchise ended up on hiatus for so long.
 
Thing is, we saw plenty of Galaxy class ships in the Dominion War fleets, wouldn't that have run the risk of people thinking they were seeing the Enterprise D? Or for that matter, when we saw the Intrepid class Bellerophon wouldn't someone have thought it was Voyager?

Re: use of the Galaxy class in DS9, I think the argument for its inclusion would have been a story vs. background kind of thing. That is, the studio didn't want them using the Sovereign as a throw-away background prop / Easter egg, but could have possibly been persuaded if there was a real, story-related reason for the ship to appear.

The first appearance of a Galaxy class on DS9 that was the Enterprise was the USS Odyssey, which was used specifically as an analog to the hero ship of TNG to demonstrate just how much of a threat the Dominion was to the Federation. After years of following the Enterprise and seeing it survive all of these potential calamities, the exact same type of ship is destroyed after a single, five-minute battle with a newly introduced enemy. They needed that kind of shorthand to really sell the gravity of the situation. It wouldn't have worked as well with any other class of ship.

That said, I still think it was ridiculous to not include Sovereigns in the giant fleet battles.
 
So not only is Admiral Anderson already so stereotypically militaristic it isn't even funny, his flagship belongs to a class that was named after a US Navy officer.

The guy really is Admiral GI Joe.

Considering that I'm active duty US Navy and have had interactions with mutiple Admirals over my 15+ year career, I can say that Anderson is the ONLY Admiral in the show that actually comes across like a REAL Admiral. Kudos to the actor for that one.

Again, to be honest, the only "new" Fed ship design I don't like is Discovery's.

Have to agree on this point. Discovery is the only ship class I actively dislike. It wouldn't take much to make the ship likable (fill in that saucer gap with the grilles we were originally shown in the teaser, make those grilles rotate instead of the saucer's surface, and tilt the nacelle pylons upward more in line with 'conventional' starship aesthetics and they'd have a halfway decent design) but as it stand the Discovery isn't all that good looking to me.

IMHO, the Shenzhou and Gagarin are my favorite ships from the series thus far. Simplicity of design and their more compact nature helps me think of them as more 'streamlined and efficient' ships. Plus they don't have large blocky components such as the engineering hull of the Discovery.
 
It's strange how every ship at the Battle of the Binaries was its own unique class, no doubles. Starfleet must have a LOT of ship classes back then.
 
It's strange how every ship at the Battle of the Binaries was its own unique class, no doubles. Starfleet must have a LOT of ship classes back then.

Not sure what you mean. There were several ships of the same class in the battle.
 
One is tempted to speculate on what was sent. Every available ship? Or examples of ships expected to be useful against Klingons? Are ships of the T'Plana-Hath, Edison and Clarke designs perhaps particularly common in the far frontier and therefore more easily available?

I'm sort of hoping that with this many ship types to choose from, the Makers will be able to choose the dramatically most satisfying for each appearance. There are differences in that respect: the T'Plana-Hath appears to have giant shuttlebays if one needs a planetary assault, relief or evacuation ship, the four-nacellers have many satisfactorily separable bits if a spectacular wounding rather than a basic destruction is called for, the Edison is nicely compact if puny is desirable, etc.

Timo Saloniemi
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top