Oh look, another Anwar thread.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ugyq-D1v2ho#t=1m50s
"It was very exciting just to know that there was going to be a CG character, that IT WAS GOING TO BE A MAJOR PLAYER FOR THAT SEASON."
SPOCK: I can't help wondering if there are any more of those weapons wandering around the universe.
KIRK: I certainly hope not.
Even TOS had the sense to leave an opening here just like TNG did with the Borg etc. Completely wiping out something just because you're too arrogant to conceive of future writers being able to bring it back with a good story? That's irresponsible.
Stop pulling shit out of your ass.They invented the 8472 for one story and one story alone, Scorpion. They were meant to simply be a plot device to keep the Borg off VOY's back. Problem was, the writers had no intention of keeping them around but needed a quick cheap way of getting rid of them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ugyq-D1v2ho#t=1m50s
"It was very exciting just to know that there was going to be a CG character, that IT WAS GOING TO BE A MAJOR PLAYER FOR THAT SEASON."
It's actually a waste to put all that time and money into creating CG models if you're not going to use it more than once. Once it's created, it's relatively very easy to reuse it with additional scenes and animations.Also it's too expensive to use them again because of CGI.
Klingons, Romulans, Khan, Q, warp core breaches.If a show introduces a threat, it's the show's responsibility to get rid of that threat.
No it doesn't.The audience hates that VOY could actually talk with the 8472 in any way possible.
This is how the final scene of that episode ends:Imagine if TOS had just left the Doomsday Machine free to fly around the universe carving up planets?
SPOCK: I can't help wondering if there are any more of those weapons wandering around the universe.
KIRK: I certainly hope not.
Even TOS had the sense to leave an opening here just like TNG did with the Borg etc. Completely wiping out something just because you're too arrogant to conceive of future writers being able to bring it back with a good story? That's irresponsible.
Depends on execution. And I'm glad you're not a writer.none would go over well with the audience.