• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Was the cancellation a blessing in disguise?

Coming late to the party . . . .

Interesting question. I do think that the sense that TOS was snuffed out before its time may have contributed to the persistent fannish lobbying for a revival.

Look at Firefly/Serenity these days. Pretty much the same phenomenon.

By contrast, I'm not seeing huge pushes to revive Buffy or Angel or Smallville or X-Files or Xena, because, I suspect, there's a general sense that, for better or for worse, those shows had run their course and enjoyed good, healthy runs. Fans are satisfied that they got their fair share.

Questions of declining quality aside, if TOS had completed its five-year mission, it's possible fans would have not have felt "cheated" out of What Might Have Been and just accepted, okay, that was a great show but it's over now. What next?
 
It was a blessing, as the quality of the scripts had clearly taken a nosedive. As the above poster mentionms, had the series lasted five years we as fans or the fans alive in those days might not have felt cheated and thereby wanting more. Imagine that for a second. No TAS, No TOS Movies, and maybe even no futher series spinoffs.
 
And if anyone can provide evidence of clearly visible wires, I'll humbly concede that part of my debate. But for 40+ years, I've yet to spot the "strings" used to suspend the model in those iconic shots.

Sincerely,

Bill

Check out the episode Forbidden World, the 4th of the 2nd season, just before the opening credits. They use a shot of the Jupiter 2 crashing, darkened for night, and you can see the sunlight reflect off the guide wires. One of the ways they kept you from seeing them was by having the wires vertically positioned, with one end higher than the other. The model was pushed and gravity did the rest. The J2 was not hung from wires for the crash scene, it was sliding down them. With the fog and a little over exposure, the wires were effectively invisible. The overexposure helped with the Flying Sub shots in Voyage, many of which are just as convincing today as ever.
 
One of the ways they kept you from seeing them was by having the wires vertically positioned, with one end higher than the other. The model was pushed and gravity did the rest. The J2 was not hung from wires for the crash scene, it was sliding down them. With the fog and a little over exposure, the wires were effectively invisible. The overexposure helped with the Flying Sub shots in Voyage, many of which are just as convincing today as ever.

Yes. It's called the Lydecker method, used by FX artists Howard and Theodore Lydecker in productions going back to the 1941 Captain Marvel serial, and including the '50s Commando Cody/Rocketman serials that were the inspiration for The Rocketeer. The use of nearly horizontal wires made them harder to spot.
 
The J2 was not hung from wires for the crash scene, it was sliding down them.

Right, that was the basis of the "Leidecker Bros." method; models slid down a pair of wires, one end set higher than the other and the model slid smoothly downwards without awkward wobbling. The technique was also used to "fly" a puppet of "Commando Cody", a rocket man type character from the heyday of the Republic serials. ("Zombies of the Stratosphere" was one of those serials and depicted a rather youthful Leonard Nimoy playing an invading "Martian". His was the last survivor and told Cody where he could locate a bomb capable of destroying the Earth, allowing him to defuse it.)

Sincerely,

Bill
 
79 is really enough. Lots to love. Not ao many you can't get a handle on the whole series in your head.

I'll go "blessing."
 
Looks like Christopher beat me to the punch and used the correct spelling to boot. But yeah, "what he said." ;)

Sincerely,

Bill
 
I believe a lot of fans made audio recordings of ST episodes with their tape recorders, just putting the mike in front of the TV speaker. Very low-fidelity, but for many it was the only way to preserve a record of the episode.

My God, I thought I was the only kid who did that!

Of course, it's very frustrating to go back later to listen to my recording and hear my mother's voice yelling to shut off the TV and do my homework.
 
I believe a lot of fans made audio recordings of ST episodes with their tape recorders, just putting the mike in front of the TV speaker. Very low-fidelity, but for many it was the only way to preserve a record of the episode.

My God, I thought I was the only kid who did that!

Of course, it's very frustrating to go back later to listen to my recording and hear my mother's voice yelling to shut off the TV and do my homework.

Recordings like that from the seventies were how I realized they had cut stuff out in the eighties syndication runs.

The amazing thing is that Doctor Who fans used that very method to preserve the audio from all the erased episodes from the sixties.
 
That's how we recorded "Elvis in Concert" in 1977. Don't tell RCA.

He'll be back soon, anyway . . .
 
It's surprisingly easy to get opposites mixed up with one another, since the concepts are so "close" to each other in our minds. I often see people write "ancestor" when they mean "descendant."
 
It's surprisingly easy to get opposites mixed up with one another, since the concepts are so "close" to each other in our minds. I often see people write "ancestor" when they mean "descendant."
JK Rowling even did the Descendant/Ancestor thing in early printings, I believe. Caused much controversial debate
 
I will add my voice to the 'Yes' to the OP question.

It also spared us seeing what Trek in most of the 70's would have looked like... prob a cross between SPACE: 1999, STARLOST, and Galaxy Quest :)

I shudder to think about the bad video chroma key that would have been employed to cut costs.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top