• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Was Picard Wesley's real father?

Had there been an affair between Picard and Beverly before Jack died and that there was unresolved guilt on both sides would've made them more complicated characters. Having Wesley be Picard's son would've been interesting, if potentially cliched.

No doubt. However, with the sexual tension between Picard and Beverly, I think the whole dynamic was clichéd as it was. :shrug:
 
Had there been an affair between Picard and Beverly before Jack died and that there was unresolved guilt on both sides would've made them more complicated characters.
Jack's death under Picard commad is already a strong factor of complication between them. Picard had already enough a rich background to not needing that. Why having "Wesley, I'm your father" when you can have Tapestry? Beverly could have had a bigger background, but I don't think adultery is the more productive idea. And there was already a main character with an "illegitimate" son :klingon:...but perhaps Alexander's real parents were Minuet and Thomas Riker.....
 
What's "more adult" about Picard being Wesley's father? It is not adult--it is an abused hallmark of the soap-opera, and ST had enough of that in its history.
In adultery, there's the word adult....
Considering there was already David Marcus in the TOS movies and the premises of Alexander's conception in the holodeck are seen, we can easily concludes Star Trek viewers know how babies are made.:p:p

What would scandalize the fans is the betrayal, not the sexuality.
It's not adultery if neither participant is married.
 
I'm more interested in what Beverly kept trying to tell Jean Luc but never seemed able to get to. Was that ever resolved?
 
I didn't say David and Alexander were born from adultery. They're both born from unmarried parents. My point is, since two characters in Star Trek were raised by their single mother (of course, it was shorter for Alexander), the Star Trek viewers are clearly enough adult to accept a child born from adultery.
 
Watching the first season again and listening to the Mission Log podcast made me wonder if this was ever considered.

Was the idea rejected because the producers knew it would scandalize the fans? I'm thinking of the tempest in a teapot over some language in this board's Fan Productions "Axanar" thread.

Do the sensibilities of the more sensitive Trek fans prevent more adult ideas from ever surfacing in Trek? Is Trek essentially happy-go-lucky family fare like the Abrams films - eschewing mature content for all-ages appeal?

Is one exclusive of the other?
The adult story was something along the lines of.

Wesley: you got my father killed,

Picard: dam straight, thats what he gets for fathering such an insufferable b@$t@3d.

:guffaw::lol::rofl::techman::eek::scream:
 
Based solely on the fact that Wheaton still has hair, no.

Actually, the manifestation of baldness comes from the mother, rather than from the father. That doesn't mean that the baldness gene can't be present in fathers, but it manifests in the son more often from the mother side than the father side.
 
Speaking of that season 7 episode, doesn't it feel like it's a huge cop-out at the end? Bok somehow finds a guy who could have been Picard's son (but wasn't) and somehow messes with his DNA temporarily to make Picard think he has a son, and then kill the son? Why not skip all that nonsense and make him Picard's son? What's the harm in it? As presented, who cares if the guy dies or not. It's already established that Picard was a wild guy in his youth, so knocking someone up along the way wouldn't have been a shocker.

It feels like someone (Berman?) made them change the script in the 11th hour to make the guy NOT Picard's son at the end.

The reason the creative team decided not to make him Picard's son was to ensure the "end of the Picard line" moroseness of Star Trek: Generations (which was shortly to enter production) was kept intact. I think this is chronicled in Nemecek's "Companion" book.

True, extra-martial affairs as portrayed in soaps can hardly be called believable or realistic. But, Trek has/had a great stable of writers - is it really hard to believe that they could not craft a good story about adultery on behalf of a main castmember (Dr. Crusher)?

It would've been terrible. And remember, rightly or wrongly, at the time the idea was that 24th century humanity - especially the TNG crew - were a 'perfect' representation of the best the race has to offer.

Moreover, cheating on your best mate with his wife (and fathering a child, which your oblivious best mate then raises as his own) is pretty tawdry (even with "great writers") and would have damaged the character of Picard beyond repair, I believe.

It would've been bad for the character(s) and the show.
 
In what universe do Beverly and Riker have a child? Not in the Prime Universe right? It's only in some of the multitudes in "Parallels", in which anything that can happen has happened somewhere. So, whatever.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top