I noticed a lot of debate about feminism spring up from this debate and this is my theory on why it sometimes gets a bad reputation at least when it comes to dating.
I think a lot of guys who sort of embrace old school values in how to treat women proably feel like they are getting mixed messages. On one hand rude behavior and treating women like crap is frowned upon but then you turn around and often seen this behvior be rewarded for guys who do these things.
Everyone knows that their are women who tend to go for the "bad boy" type. Guys treat women like crap yet they still somehow always end up getting a women to fall in love with them or just hook up if they are just looking for sex. I know this from personal experience because my step dad was a abusive asshole who would hit my mom and frankly the day he killed himself I was happy. My sisters have also fallen for guys like this.
Granted I do think a lot of these views come more from what they see on tv as oposed to personal experience but that idea does exsit and until it changes their will always be guys who embrace that old line of thinking. It doesn't help to see such a guy like Donald Trump act this way and still he ends up with the hot trophy wife and get to become president. How is any women would ever have anything to do with someone like Trump if life was just about accepting ethical behavior?
Also for DS9 example I see a difference also in how Bashir is a hot young doctor and Quark is the slimy not so attractive Troll yet Bashir is presented as charming and Quark is seen as a awful with his behavior. To me though this go back to question of how much is this idea coming from what we see on tv as oposed to what people experience in their own lives.
Jason
And as an addendum you'll also get:
Tell me again how a guy got into legal trouble for smiling at a woman. Or for trying to chat her up and then retreating when she told him she's not interested.*
* You're welcome to swap genders around here.
First, terms for seriously bad behavior get established... and then the way people use the term drifts over time. It gets used for smaller and smaller examples, watering the terms down. Sexual Harassment was supposed to be blatantly wrong stuff, actually involving force or pressure (threats of firing) from employers for sex. Now we're talking about a nice co-worker asking someone out a bit too often. Bashir, obviously innocent. Quark, guilty.
As for why Bajor doesn't arrest Quark, historically we only just started making such stuff illegal, so why expect other planets in other centuries to have our laws?
There are always IVF and turkey bastersWell if both Peole are not allowed to ask the other one out, in the end nothing will happen.
Everyone remains and dies virgins, no more humans.....☹
"Emmett Louis Till (July 25, 1941 – August 28, 1955) was an African-American teenager who was lynched in Mississippi at the age of 14 in 1955 after being falsely accused of flirting with a white woman. The brutality of his murder and the fact that his killers were acquitted drew attention to the long history of violent persecution of African Americans in the United States. Till posthumously became an icon of the Civil Rights Movement."
And yet you read the messages....This board sucks. Jesus Christ, I just want to read about Star Trek for fucks sake.
Which is exactly what Ezri did. So he did.But Dax would've been within her rights to tell Bashir to knock it off
We were trying to explain about respect and equality. That's what Star Trek is, right?
It's a question not just of severity but frequency. Asking a coworker out once and getting turned down: not harassment. Asking over and over after it's been made clear the other party isn't interested: harassment.
Now, Dax never complained and she later said she enjoyed being pursued, and nobody tried to punish Bashir on her behalf, so no harm no foul as far as I'm concerned. But Dax would've been within her rights to tell Bashir to knock it off, and if he persisted, it would've become a disciplinary issue.
(Obviously agreed that Quark is much more guilty of this.)
The series stated repeatedly that Bajor is a highly advanced society--or at least, they were before the occupation. I just find it interesting that Odo was always up Quark's ass about smuggling contraband but never seemed to care about his very blatant exploitation of his employees (not just the dabo girls, either). Sisko stated more than once that the Federation held the lease on Quark's Bar, and he did use that as leverage against Quark on a few occasions, but you'd think it could've also been used to bring working conditions up to a minimum standard not far from, say, early 21st century Earth.![]()
Nobody is saying that. It's just that his behavior can be seen in a different light than it was during 1993. If the wrote the show today It makes you wonder if they would use the same aproach and hell I wonder if they would have played it differently if Jadzia was written then more like she was in the later seasons. Remember back during season 1 they were still trying to make her more like Spock.Yes. Bashir was a twisted, perverse sexual predator. Just like Geordi.
![]()
Yes. Bashir was a twisted, perverse sexual predator. Just like Geordi.
![]()
Okay you probably think biology is totally a social construct and all women snow removal teams(that don't work by the way) are totally awesome.
To be honest the whole feminist movement is a problem it's a cancer, it's bad for women, children, men and the health of civilization itself.
It needs to be forcibly removed from western society lest it metastatize and kill us all.
Oh and if you call me fat again I will personally badger every single mod until I get you banned.
Against a woman? I doubt it.
Fatty.
Like with other dudes that also play video games and are overweight?
Arbitrarily applying a framework does not validate that framework. Moreover, it may end up saying more about who you are than what it is you are trying to describe.Which is wholly irrelevant, as they can still be described in the predatory terms, opening the way to prosecution.
This points to something that is always difficult with regard to understanding the social and cultural changes portrayed in Trek. The writers want things to be different, indeed better, than how they are today. However, they also want to have dramas that the viewers can related to. The TNG era is supposed to be more open about sexuality, but the writers still want to portray the exigencies of human relationships. Bashir may seem creepy to us, but in a society that is more open about sexual matters, his behavior may not stand out that much. I think that the same problems show up in which their are "violations of the mind," if you would, where characters react differently when various aliens look into the thoughts of the characters, invade their dreams, or even take over their bodies.First, terms for seriously bad behavior get established... and then the way people use the term drifts over time. It gets used for smaller and smaller examples, watering the terms down. Sexual Harassment was supposed to be blatantly wrong stuff, actually involving force or pressure (threats of firing) from employers for sex. Now we're talking about a nice co-worker asking someone out a bit too often. Bashir, obviously innocent. Quark, guilty.
I think what really happened was Bashir The Sexusl Harrasser was actually an alternate universe. Yep. That's my theory.And yet you read the messages....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.