The Joker's Daughter is actually Two-Face's daughter. Yes, really.Can the Joker have a daughter
Edit - looks like we can.
The Joker's Daughter is actually Two-Face's daughter. Yes, really.Can the Joker have a daughter
Edit - looks like we can.
The Joker's Daughter is actually Two-Face's daughter. Yes, really.
Wow. Comics.
Now audio with Casey Affleck speaking with WEEI Sports Radio Network has been released where Casey Affleck says he doesn't think Ben Affleck will do the movie.
It's mentioned to Casey Affleck that there is a rumor Ben Affleck won't be in the standalone Batman movie, with Casey Affleck replying:
"Um... I thought he was an okay Batman. As far as... Nah, he was great. He's a hero, so he had something to channel and work with there. But he's not going to do that movie, I don't think."
Update: The audio also has Casey Affleck stating he made it up, but he says that after he is told it's breaking news.
If they did have to recast Batman, I think they'd just do a James Bond and recast without acknowledging in the movie that its a different actor.
They also did it with Bruce Banner.So did the MCU with James "Rhodey" Rhodes / War Machine. See? People have already forgotten about Terrence Howard!
They also did it with Bruce Banner.
THR also reporting the same news
Casey Affleck Says Ben Affleck Is Done With Batman
Honestly, I find all these Ben Affleck is leaving or not rumors to be more entertaining than all boring the JL reshoot rumors.
Time for Batman to slip into a Lazarus Pit and come out looking like a much younger version of himself played by a new actor?
I'd imagine Ben wants to beat the crap out of Casey right now, or at least he regrets telling this news to the guy.
Ben likely gets a percentage of how much JL makes, so he needs the movie to do great. News of him leaving will not be a good thing.
In the video of the interview, Casey says he made it up. They were joking around.THR also reporting the same news
Ben Affleck Not Returning as Batman, Says Brother Casey
In other non-news, did you know Zack Snyder's 300 is responsible for presaging the rise and politics of the Alt-Right?...
I'm waiting for the day when people in the media declare Snyder to be the Devil himself. Because calling someone Hitler isn't enough anymore.
Who knows if he was really joking around? He could have let that news slip accidentally. Everyone was denying all the rumors about Ben not directing The Batman, until Matt Reeves was announced as director.In the video of the interview, Casey says he made it up. They were joking around.
In other non-news, did you know Zack Snyder's 300 is responsible for presaging the rise and politics of the Alt-Right?
https://twitter.com/TheAVClub/status/896239589299556354
I'm waiting for the day when people in the media declare Snyder to be the Devil himself. Because calling someone Hitler isn't enough anymore.
Last month, Ben said he's not going anywhere as Batman during the SDCC panel.Who knows if he was really joking around? He could have let that news slip accidentally. Everyone was denying all the rumors about Ben not directing The Batman, until Matt Reeves was announced as director.
Don't you find it odd that Snyder seems to draw such criticism and discussion, even though he's not presently in the news. I mean, someone at the AV Club wrote the aforementioned piece, submitted to their editor and the editor decided it was worth publishing. The timing of it's release coinciding with the recent protest and tragedy in Charllottesville VA. Somehow, someway, this is Zack Snyder's fault.I don't think Snyder is the devil, but he was completely the wrong person to have the responsibly of starting the DCEU. The man is no Kevin Feige.
People would argue that he does, and people would argue that he doesn't. What I've noticed is that people in Hollywood and internet journalists and critics don't seem to like Zack Snyder as a person and use his films as a way to assert their dislike for his ideas and interpretations. I wouldn't be surprise if WB noticed that Snyder is a bigger distraction to the DCEU films, than a help. It could have factored into Snyder and his wife Deb bowing out, alongside their grief of losing a child.Snyder is the guy that does grimdark superhero flicks, and he should have stuck to what he does best. The man doesn't understand Superman AT ALL.
I don't know the man. I don't presume to.People would argue that he does, and people would argue that he doesn't. What I've noticed is that people in Hollywood and internet journalists and critics don't seem to like Zack Snyder as a person and use his films as a way to assert their dislike for his ideas and interpretations. I wouldn't be surprise if WB noticed that Snyder is a bigger distraction to the DCEU films, than a help. It could have factored into Snyder and his wife Deb bowing out, alongside their grief of losing a child.
And in so doing, co-signed those politics and ideology.You mean Frank Miller's 300. The politics and ideology of the work are Miller's. All Snyder did was make a very expensive motion comic out of it.
That article was posted last Friday, before the Charlottesville rally, and is part of a series called "A History of Violence", in which "Tom Breihan picks the most important action movie of every year, starting with the genre’s birth and moving right up to whatever Vin Diesel’s doing this very minute." Articles have been published roughly every two weeks since January 2016, and by last Friday, it was 2007's turn, hence the discussion of 300.Don't you find it odd that Snyder seems to draw such criticism and discussion, even though he's not presently in the news.
Did you read the piece? The literal demonizing of brown-skinned peoples, plus slandering them as gay pedophiles while completely omitting the Spartan history of doing that very thing, seems to me a pretty direct correlation to the hatreds of white supremacists. (Though I do ding the article for not discussing the fact that the Iraq War was at its height when the movie was made, and modern-day Persia, Iran, was part of W.'s "Axis of Evil", so there were obvious contemporary political undertones to the movie, also.)How the author connected the director of a 10 year old movie, based on a graphic novel, to the current rash of far right demonstrations and bigotry we are currently seeing, I have no idea.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.