I didn't bother reading this properly, I'm afraid you're going to have to write another post explaining the same concept to me again.

I didn't bother reading this properly, I'm afraid you're going to have to write another post explaining the same concept to me again.
I am aware of that, which does not mean my point is invalid, no need to be rude with your shouting. If you find repeating yourself a burden then stay off message boardsYou missed the point entirely.
LIKE I ALREADY SAID
The decision was not made all at once, and the whole situation has been pretty nebulous for 50 years.
I shouldn't have to repeat myself on a message board.
no need to be rude with your shouting.
I am aware of that, which does not mean my point is invalid,
If you find repeating yourself a burden then stay off message boards.
That's precisely what it means. It never was made clear what exactly the situation was with Starfleet and Earth, and indeed as you pointed out in your own post (lol), different teams have had different interpretations of it. Not to mention the fact that there are practical concerns for a live action production (including the need to reach a wide audience) that novels don't have.
By STMP it was very clear, by STWOK it was very clear, by STTFS it was very clear, you want them all listed?
The movies had the makeup budget to scatter a few nonhuman faces as extras on the bridge.
They managed it with Klingons, the audience had no problem accepting those faces
It would be highly unlikely, given that a slow birthrate in itself would mean evolution in Vulcans would be extremely slow. Not to mention that they would still need to survive the harsh Vulcan planet, and all the other ultraviolent Vulcans trying to kill them.
You ever notice there are more alien faces in the background in Star Wars than Star Trek?You ever notice how Star Wars is set in a Galaxy far, far away, but it's still basically about humans?
You ever notice there are more alien faces in the background in Star Wars than Star Trek?
You mean the Captain Worf spinoff is right up there with the Captain Riker spinoff?
I don't think it limits them. Vulcans live for hundred of years. They would have the ability to produce many many childrenIf Vulcans only had sex every seven years it would not explain how many humans fall in love with them. No human is waiting that long.
It also biologically does not track, why would such a reproductive limitation evolve in any species?
I'm wondering why we're assuming Vulcanians evolved at all. They're not native to their home planet anyway. Being that it's likely they are actually descendants of Sargon's People.
There's no evidence for any of that.
Spock said that Sargon's story explained a great many things in Vulcan prehistory. Meaning that he at least considered a likely story.
I'm wondering why we're assuming Vulcanians evolved at all. They're not native to their home planet anyway. Being that it's likely they are actually descendants of Sargon's People. It's also likely they could have been engineered rather than evolved.
Sex is a fantastic thing. The feeling of intimacy and humor between two people just makes life better. It's why some people have multiple lovers; it can make them happier as a person and in the relationship. It is great when you may buy a funny sex toy for your partner, and he or she will not get mad at you.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.