• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Vulcan endangered question

It looked much the same when it was initiated in the NuUniverse, at the conclusion of the movie...

That is, we saw the time-hopping version three times: two "arrivals" ends (for Nero and Spock Prime), one "departures" end (for Nero's final curtain). They all looked the same.

We could have seen another potential "departures" end when Vulcan collapsed, but there was nothing visible there - which is sort of logical if scale holds together, because the hole was only a few kilometers across in those other cases while Vulcan was thousands of kilometers wide.

We also saw something in the twisted and tortured mind meld, but whether it looked the same or different is difficult to tell. It flashed bright blue when ships went in, while the emergences of Nero and Spock created more of a white flash, but that could be mind meld color filters at work...

Timo Saloniemi
 
I wonder how big the black hole that ate Vulcan was. It seemed to swollow the planet pretty quickly. If it was small it would have taken time, growing in size and effect as it went. If it were small enough it could actually orbit within the planet, carving out tunnels as it went before eventually settling in the center.

And how much red matter did they use to create it? It looks like Spock still had a bunch of the stuff on the jellyfish and yet the black hole it created on the Narada took much longer to destroy the ship in comparison. You'd think that the ship would disappear as soon as a black hole appeared on the ship, seeing as it was created with all the remaining red matter.
 
Indeed, it almost seems as if the amount of red matter used is unrelated to the size or strength of the hole produced. Probably just a tiny drop is enough to tear spacetime apart, at which point other factors dictate what sort of a hole will be formed. Enough to suck in a supernova, enough to suck in a planet, enough to suck in a starship...

Or then all of those are the same thing. Starships have the ability to shrug off gravity, after all, and gravity is the only arrow in a black hole's quiver. Gravity, and gravity gradients aka tidal stresses. (And a fanatical devotion to... Sorry, wrong show.) Starships don't fight gravity simply by the power of their engines - they also have doodads aboard that actually negate gravity and laugh at it when it goes down. Thus, the very same thing that tears Vulcan asunder might have serious trouble harming a Romulan mining platform. Nero's death might be solely due to the damage his ship suffered from Spock's ramming attack and Kirk's later shots, and he would have simply moved to some other time and place through the hole unharmed if Kirk hadn't fired on him.

Timo Saloniemi
 
It makes you wonder why Spock brought along so much of the stuff in the first place. He had enough to create the black hole that consumed the supernova (!), destroyed Vulcan and create a black hole insode Nero's ship. Judging by the size of the tanke and the size of the ball of red matter he had many, many, many more times more than he needed. After all, just a syringe full was enough to destroy Vulcan.
 
It makes you wonder why Spock brought along so much of the stuff in the first place. He had enough to create the black hole that consumed the supernova (!), destroyed Vulcan and create a black hole insode Nero's ship. Judging by the size of the tanke and the size of the ball of red matter he had many, many, many more times more than he needed. After all, just a syringe full was enough to destroy Vulcan.

I assumed that it was only stable enough for transportation in large quantities. You don't want it igniting in the cargo hold!
 
In that case you'd think it would be better stored in something other than a big glass tube and transported on a ship that a single shot wouldn't destroy. Look how easy it was for Nero to get enough red matter to destroy hundreds of planets.
 
Yeah, except they needed their fastest ship to get the Red Matter to the supernova in time to save Romulus - and they still failed! A heavily armoured battlecruiser would have been even slower.
 
According to Spock, the supernova "threatened to destroy the galaxy" (as ridiculous as that sounds), so a lot more planets were at stake than just Romulus.
 
And yet, somehow, one black hole was not only going to save Romulus but also draw all the energy and matter back to it. Yeah, there really is no way for this to make sense. Ditch the galaxy line, make the star a companion of Romulus's star and have one of the jets of the black hole pointed right at Romulus's orbit. Still pretty silly but what can you do?
 
But if you ditch the galaxy line, you're also ditching the timeline (supernova explodes, "destroying everything in it's path", then Spock meets with Romulan leadership, then the ship is prepared and launched from Vulcan) and all of Spock's "I had little time" stuff after Romulus was destroyed.

I just accept it as silly magical fantasy element, like the Genesis device or a big pink forcefield surrounding the galaxy.:shrug:
 
At least both of those are totally fantasy like red matter. Having a supernova that threatens the galaxy? That's like having a falling acorn threaten to destroy the Earth if it hits.
 
At least both of those are totally fantasy like red matter. Having a supernova that threatens the galaxy? That's like having a falling acorn threaten to destroy the Earth if it hits.
I prefer to interpret it more metaphorically: The destruction of Romulus would cause political disruption through out the galaxy upsetting the balance of power.
 
... Starships have the ability to shrug off gravity, after all, and gravity is the only arrow in a black hole's quiver. Gravity, and gravity gradients aka tidal stresses. (And a fanatical devotion to... Sorry, wrong show.) Starships don't fight gravity simply by the power of their engines - they also have doodads aboard that actually negate gravity and laugh at it when it goes down. Thus, the very same thing that tears Vulcan asunder might have serious trouble harming a Romulan mining platform. Nero's death might be solely due to the damage his ship suffered from Spock's ramming attack and Kirk's later shots, and he would have simply moved to some other time and place through the hole unharmed if Kirk hadn't fired on him.

Timo Saloniemi

The Enterprise had a little difficulty shrugging off gravity and it was still capable of warp 4. I suspect the problem is that its a bit more tricky when a black hole appears inside your ship, as opposed to the ship going through a wormhole once it has stabilised. Its not as though Nero just put on a couple of extra pounds, a developing internal black hole has got to stress any ship's "doodads". This would seem to tie in more with Kirk's remark about the Narada being too close to the singularity. Well you couldn't get much closer!

Of course if you want to advance a theory that implies nuKirk, nuSpock and the rest of the nuEnterprise's crew didn't know what they were talking about, I will happly commend your of integrity, even if I don't agree, on this occasion. ;)


I just accept it as silly magical fantasy element, like the Genesis device or a big pink forcefield surrounding the galaxy.:shrug:

The "Genesis device" and "the big pink forcefield" are not fantasy elements, in my view. Merely unexplained technology or phenomena. The difference is that while red matter is also unexplained technology, it is simply used to achieve impossible things, even given its purported properties. So if there is a fantasy element about red matter, its the way it is used, not its scientific validity (some leeway should be given concerning scientific advancement in SF after all).

I'll grant you, these things are examples of soft science fiction. But there is no indication they are supposed to be seen as magical. I.e unexplainable scientifically even in principle. I don't think mere unlikeliness or lack to explanation (however annoying that may be) renders them fantasy. Who would have thought a thousand years ago there was a strange magnetic field surrounding the Earth for example. I'm not sure that being ridiculous in some way (implementation for example) renders them fantasy either mind you.


If that's the case, why try to stop the supernova with red matter if Romulus has already been destroyed?
Dunno. I guess Spock figured since he was there why not? Or maybe to save Remus?

That's a nice attempt at a catch. So Spock arrives just as Romulus is destroyed and has to deploy the red matter before Remus also buys the farm. No wonder he had "little time"!

Unfortunately here is where the ridiculous use of red matter alluded to above comes in. If the black hole is going to have any chance of containing the super nova it would have to immediately expand its event horizon to just beyond the super nova's wave front (at least in the direction of Remus). Even if that was an undocumented capability of red matter, it clearly doesn't happen because if it had Spock Prime would be dead as soon as it deployed (or maybe he would be on his way to the past, or both, who knows?). I.e. Producing the red matter black hole only served to allow Nero and Spock to travel to the past, nothing more.

*** Edit:

Hmmm, perhaps there might be enough time, a few seconds, perhaps a minute or so, to allow the red matter to deploy, so Spock can get out of the way at high warp. But that just creates more problems. Remus has, at least for a while, a truly massive black hole within a few light seconds. If tidal forces didn’t rip it apart it would probably fall in (Oops)*. And if Spock is that far from the black hole that he is out of its gravitational effect, how does he fall into it? Actually, how does anyone accidentally fall into a black hole anyway? What do you mean the Enterprise almost fell into one?

* Just as well red matter black holes aren't seen to work that way any how.
 
Last edited:
At least both of those are totally fantasy like red matter. Having a supernova that threatens the galaxy? That's like having a falling acorn threaten to destroy the Earth if it hits.
While the galaxy going up in a gigantic fireball is silly, supernovae can have far ranging and deady effects. While the whole galaxy may not be destroyed, the core worlds of the Federation, not to mention galactic neighbours like the Klingons, may have been at risk. Of course, you have to assume these effects are happening at high warp speeds to have an impact in anyone's lifetime - but Trek does that all the time (the Praxis explosion being the most prominant example, but Trek is packed with FTL space phenomena)
 
At least both of those are totally fantasy like red matter. Having a supernova that threatens the galaxy? That's like having a falling acorn threaten to destroy the Earth if it hits.
While the galaxy going up in a gigantic fireball is silly, supernovae can have far ranging and deady effects. While the whole galaxy may not be destroyed, the core worlds of the Federation, not to mention galactic neighbours like the Klingons, may have been at risk. Of course, you have to assume these effects are happening at high warp speeds to have an impact in anyone's lifetime - but Trek does that all the time (the Praxis explosion being the most prominant example, but Trek is packed with FTL space phenomena)

I believe it does say in the prequel 'Countdown' graphic series that some effects of this particular supernova were propagating through subspace, thus unexpectedly travelling FTL. This was why Spock failed to save Romulus - he basically had much less time to fix things than had been originally calculated.
 
Anything nonsensical in Trek XI, like glass jars holding way too much of a potential super-weapon, and including any perceived plot holes, were intended to send a message to the Overtly Anal among us: It doesn't matter.

And they're right, it didn't matter. The film is still making money.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top