He never reported any results of his sub-massive scale magnetic flux experiment.
Taccy? How'd it turn out?
Taccy? How'd it turn out?
>>Cargolifter>>
Technology and materials have changed since then likely allowing an increase in the weight of the payload that could be carried. Even if it just delivered clothes and blankets and other similar items it would be more beneficial than not even getting it there at all.
Do you agree or disagree with what I have just said?
Nope, I don't, Mr Aerospace. The tech hasn't changed enough.
Consider:
LZ 129 Hindenburg
Crew: 40 to 61
Capacity: 50-72 passengers
Length: 245 m (803 ft 10 in)
Diameter: 41 m (130 ft 0 in)
Volume: 200,000 m³ (7,100,000 ft³)
Powerplant: 4 × Daimler-Benz DB 602 diesel engines, 890 kW (1,200 hp) each
If it takes a nearly a quarter of a million cubic meters to loft a mere 133 people with 399 person/days of consumables, exactly how much sail area will you attempt to overcome with power for an INCREDIBLY MASSIVE Airship a la Taccy?
Oops! Almost forgot! You need to drastically increase the balloon size to get the same lift with Helium...provided saftey is to be a factor.
>>Cargolifter>>
Technology and materials have changed since then likely allowing an increase in the weight of the payload that could be carried. Even if it just delivered clothes and blankets and other similar items it would be more beneficial than not even getting it there at all.
Do you agree or disagree with what I have just said?
Nope, I don't, Mr Aerospace. The tech hasn't changed enough.
Consider:
LZ 129 Hindenburg
Crew: 40 to 61
Capacity: 50-72 passengers
Length: 245 m (803 ft 10 in)
Diameter: 41 m (130 ft 0 in)
Volume: 200,000 m³ (7,100,000 ft³)
Powerplant: 4 × Daimler-Benz DB 602 diesel engines, 890 kW (1,200 hp) each
If it takes a nearly a quarter of a million cubic meters to loft a mere 133 people with 399 person/days of consumables, exactly how much sail area will you attempt to overcome with power for an INCREDIBLY MASSIVE Airship a la Taccy?
Oops! Almost forgot! You need to drastically increase the balloon size to get the same lift with Helium...provided saftey is to be a factor.
We can produce now far more lightweight stronger materials than they used to have and other technology could be incorporated along with the Balloon to give lift.
Nope, I don't, Mr Aerospace. The tech hasn't changed enough.
Consider:
LZ 129 Hindenburg
Crew: 40 to 61
Capacity: 50-72 passengers
Length: 245 m (803 ft 10 in)
Diameter: 41 m (130 ft 0 in)
Volume: 200,000 m³ (7,100,000 ft³)
Powerplant: 4 × Daimler-Benz DB 602 diesel engines, 890 kW (1,200 hp) each
If it takes a nearly a quarter of a million cubic meters to loft a mere 133 people with 399 person/days of consumables, exactly how much sail area will you attempt to overcome with power for an INCREDIBLY MASSIVE Airship a la Taccy?
Oops! Almost forgot! You need to drastically increase the balloon size to get the same lift with Helium...provided saftey is to be a factor.
We can produce now far more lightweight stronger materials than they used to have and other technology could be incorporated along with the Balloon to give lift.
Taking drops of water out of the ocean, lighter-than-air gasses can only lift so much and no amount of techology is going to change the laws of physics.
We can produce now far more lightweight stronger materials than they used to have and other technology could be incorporated along with the Balloon to give lift.
Taking drops of water out of the ocean, lighter-than-air gasses can only lift so much and no amount of techology is going to change the laws of physics.
Put another way, if my aunt had testicles, she'd be my uncle. BTW, Trekker, so cool you have Chloe O'Brien (Mary Lynn Rajskub) in your avatar.
Oh ya Robotech .. Love the image.Couldn't resist.![]()
How Not to Build a Heavy-Lift Airship, Lesson 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7jE...F64003C8&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=72
You should watch the whole thing, but the fun really starts at about 1:05
How Not to Build a Heavy-Lift Airship, Lesson 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7jE...F64003C8&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=72
You should watch the whole thing, but the fun really starts at about 1:05
And they put people in that thing? Madness.
Taking drops of water out of the ocean, lighter-than-air gasses can only lift so much and no amount of techology is going to change the laws of physics.
Put another way, if my aunt had testicles, she'd be my uncle. BTW, Trekker, so cool you have Chloe O'Brien (Mary Lynn Rajskub) in your avatar.
She looked so hot in that picture I had to don it.![]()
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dornier_Do_31
There only was one attempt to make a VTOL transport aicraft.
You don't need to land an aircraft to deliver supplies, you can drop stuff by parachute. During the Viet Nam war the USAF developed a low altitude delivery system where the plane would fly a low level pass down the runway and the cargo had a lanyard that caught a hook on the ground, which pulled the pallets out of the airplane. It was refined where they could deliver eggs with that thing. It's called LAPES, for 'Low Altitude Parachute Extraction System".
Cargo airships... well, the big problem is water is a thousand times denser than air. Its not that hard to make a ship that floats, after all there are thousands of cargo ships in service. As much as Tacchy proposes miracle lightweight materials I don't know that you could improve cargo capacity much more than twice that of the Hindenburg. Twice 'not that much' is what, maybe fifty containers? Trying to compete with ships that carry a thousand is gonna be tough. Even if Tacchyburg can cruise at a hundred miles an hour it still can't compete with ships. The container ship can deliver those thousand containers at less cost in one trip than T-burg can in forty; remember the bionic blimp has to make return trips to pick up more containers.
...A C17 at the same speed can carry 77tonnes...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.