• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Voyager Escape Pod numbering

BlobVanDam

Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
A fairly trivial detail, but does anyone know if there is any logic or reason behind the numbers on the escape pod hatches on Voyager? The numbers seem different between the CG model and the physical model, and I'm trying to find out what all of the numbers are, but it's so hard to find images that close. From what I can tell, the CG model just reuses the same handful of random numbers, probably due to lazy texturing.
I've only been able to find out about 10 of them from the photos I've found of the original model.
 
On the Enterprise, random numbering would be quite understandable: the numbers would be stenciled on the pods themselves, as no hatches would exist. The pods would probably be removed and reinserted every now and then; those of the Voyager were in fact launched and then recovered in at least one episode. It might even be that a given starship would mix and match her pods with a general Starfleet pool of pods of the same design.

However, on this particular ship type the explanation doesn't work, because the Voyager pods are indeed hidden behind hatches that don't leave the ship when a pod is launched or otherwise removed...

Perhaps we could argue that Starfleet stirred the pod pool before the ship embarked on her "Caretaker" mission, and stenciled corresponding new numbers onto the hatches so that the starbase crews would know which pod was inside at any given time. However, we get the impression that the Voyager sailed to DS9 and the Badlands more or less straight from her launching dock at Mars; why would there be a shuffle there already?

That is, one might assume Utopia Planitia would choose to install pods 1 through 72 in numerical order first, before mixing. But that may be a false assumption. Starfleet might just have picked the nearest 72 pods from the shelf and installed them onto NCC-74656, then checked which numbers those pods happened to hold, and then stenciled those onto the pod hatches.

OTOH, the multiple appearances of the same random number could be explained by saying that it's not a pod ID as such, it's a pod model ID. That is, the ship happens to have five pods from the 0047 series, sixteen from the 2703 series, and so forth. If so, there'd be no point in placing these models in numerical order, any more than there would be in parking the fighter jets of an airbase according to their designation, all the F-15s first and F-16s second...

Timo Saloniemi
 
An interesting theory, considering there seems to be no otherwise logical reason behind the numbering. On the studio model they seem to be entirely unique to each hatch, even though random. On the CG model it seems they're reusing the same 5 or so numbers. Either way the numbers aren't close enough to indicate consecutive numbering of the pods. And there's no correlation to its position on the ship either.

I'm trying to find out for the 3D model I'm building, but I'm considering just making up a new numbering system based on deck and position. To me it would make more sense to refer to an escape hatch that way rather than printing the arbitrary pod number on there.
 
It is very difficult to come to a logical conclusion when the physical and CG models are different, since they are supposed to really be the same ship. I think Timo's explanations make the most sense, given what we have to work with.
 
I think Timo's right as well. It particularly goes along with the idea from the TNG tech manual that some pods are different from others to improve gaggle mode function. Maybe the newer hexagonal pods take that a little further and so there's more models.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top