• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Visual continuity - Does Discovery strictly need to show past designs... at all?

+1 for the DST Enterprise.
JiWvDNcl.jpg
 
I find it amusing that some folks feel the TOS Connie shouldn't really be focused on or re-used because it looks like "something from the 60's", which it most certainly doesn't. In fact, Matt Jefferies (at Roddenberry's request) specifically designed it to be like nothing that has come before it, the majority of which were Flash Gordon-like dildo rockets with a sparkler hanging out its ass or a Lost in Space-like flying saucer. It was (and arguably still is) a groundbreaking design like no other and, while the interior sets may admittedly appear a bit more dated, the exterior of the vessel is, IMO, timeless and should have no trouble fitting in with any era.
 
What are those rings on the hull and nacelles?

but that isn't enough either.
I suspect that it's supposed to give the impression that those components were laid out in segments (like modern-day naval vessels), with the connecting seams being slightly off-flush with each other. As the ship travels through space, it collects dust and other particulates that get stuck in those seams.
 
I suspect that it's supposed to give the impression that those components were laid out in segments (like modern-day naval vessels), with the connecting seams being slightly off-flush with each other. As the ship travels through space, it collects dust and other particulates that get stuck in those seams.

I can see that.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top