I think the new ship by abrams is steam powered....
Nope. It's clearly on-screen as being powered by beer.

I think the new ship by abrams is steam powered....
What did you think the GNDN tubes were for? The ship must have relied on fluid flows just as heavily as any ship of today does... Although probably not for lubrication of moving parts. Did Kirk's ship ever demonstrate moving parts? Apart from the shuttlebay doors, that is.
Timo Saloniemi
Then I don't even know what your point is anymore, except just being argumentative.I never said or asserted, "there is no evidence that it doesn't occur." That is your Fifth Strawman so far.
More sound than WHAT? Did you propose an alternate theory or didn't you?If you know that's flawed logic then why have you used such reasoning to call your Rocket theory more sound?
No, it's a reference to the fact that the speed of light moves at a certain speed and a starship is now moving faster than that speed. Einstein didn't discover light, you know.What I did say is that the very mention of a LIGHTSPEED is a reference to Relativity it'self
There's no evidence of time dilation or impulse engines as a field drive. Sauce for the goose.There is no evidence of a forcefield reverse thrust any where in canon.
Adequately explained in the TNG tech manual, and in detail I might add.That would only be true if the device could somehow over come relativistic issues at fractions of the speed of light.
Plus the lack of shield effects in TUC, the opening scene of Generations, the lack of shield effects in every major fleet battle of DS9, the invisibility of IDF/STI fields, and so on. Specific examples can be found in Way of the Warrior, Call to Arms, Favor the Bold, Sacrifice of Angels, Tears of the Prophets, For the Uniform, and mutliple scenes in Star Trek XI.How would that help your argument?
You still wouldn't get most unless you based the list almost entirely off TOS.
It wasn't. My point was the tech manual suggests impulse engines are a reaction device, not a field drive, and certainly do not use drive plasma from the intermix chamber--or any other source--the way warp engines do. They do, instead, eject an exhaust plume at high velocities that imparts thrust on the starship, and (according to the TNG manual) they are aided in this task by use of subspace driver coils that reduce the effective mass of the ship.Of course an arguement can be validated by opposing information if your whole arguement was to contradict my argument.
I think the new ship by abrams is steam powered....
Nope. It's clearly on-screen as being powered by beer.![]()
I think the new ship by abrams is steam powered....
Nope. It's clearly on-screen as being powered by beer.![]()
Hell, we don't even know if the plasma moves at all. Perhaps it's a stationary medium through which energy flows are passing from the reactor to the warp coils?
Sure, we hear of a "plasma stream" once or twice, but that could be inexact terminology to describe a situation where something is streaming through plasma...
Timo Saloniemi
I think the new ship by abrams is steam powered....
Nope. It's clearly on-screen as being powered by beer.![]()
Maybe they should have pissed it all away then; ejecting the whole of engineering into the black hole to escape would justify a refit to make that part of the ship look like it was built in a future century.
It wasn't. My point was the tech manual suggests impulse engines are a reaction device, not a field drive, and certainly do not use drive plasma from the intermix chamber--or any other source--the way warp engines do. They do, instead, eject an exhaust plume at high velocities that imparts thrust on the starship, and (according to the TNG manual) they are aided in this task by use of subspace driver coils that reduce the effective mass of the ship.Of course an arguement can be validated by opposing information if your whole arguement was to contradict my argument.
newtype alpha you might also of used the example of "Preemptive Strike", the second to the last TNG episode, in which Lieutenant Ro leads a Marquis raid on the Enterprise D,. She penetrates the shields by taking a small ship thru the area where the impulse exhaust passes thru the aft shields, a weak point that makes a lot of sense.
It wasn't. My point was the tech manual suggests impulse engines are a reaction device, not a field drive, and certainly do not use drive plasma from the intermix chamber--or any other source--the way warp engines do. They do, instead, eject an exhaust plume at high velocities that imparts thrust on the starship, and (according to the TNG manual) they are aided in this task by use of subspace driver coils that reduce the effective mass of the ship.
newtype alpha you might also of used the example of "Preemptive Strike", the second to the last TNG episode, in which Lieutenant Ro leads a Marquis raid on the Enterprise D,. She penetrates the shields by taking a small ship thru the area where the impulse exhaust passes thru the aft shields, a weak point that makes a lot of sense.
ref ur mask......................are u ginger(judging ur avator?)
It wasn't. My point was the tech manual suggests impulse engines are a reaction device, not a field drive, and certainly do not use drive plasma from the intermix chamber--or any other source--the way warp engines do. They do, instead, eject an exhaust plume at high velocities that imparts thrust on the starship, and (according to the TNG manual) they are aided in this task by use of subspace driver coils that reduce the effective mass of the ship.
newtype alpha you might also of used the example of "Preemptive Strike", the second to the last TNG episode, in which Lieutenant Ro leads a Marquis raid on the Enterprise D,. She penetrates the shields by taking a small ship thru the area where the impulse exhaust passes thru the aft shields, a weak point that makes a lot of sense.
Remeber that was a shield penetration that the Enterprise allowed once they figured out ensign Ro Laren was aboard the Maquis vessel.
no but honestly................................think about this................does data have hairy balls...????..................or for that ,matter does he have balls......................wait dont answer the last coz he was apparenty...correct....still unsure regarding his nut sacks tho!!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.