• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News Variety Reports Robert Pattinson is the new Batman

Status
Not open for further replies.
Even when they are aping other genres they follow the exact same template. Same lighting, same colour pallette, same basic plots, same quips in the same places, same giant CGI battle against faceless opponents in the climax. They all look and sound and play the same.

Cherry-picking. You ignore the very real differences and focus exclusively on the similarities so you can justify your desired conclusion. You can "prove" any kind of nonsense that way, and that makes it utterly unworthy of taking seriously as an argument.
 
Honestly, all of the stuff people complain about with the Marvel movies, is pretty much standard for any big budget, PG-13 level action movie these days. So it's not really Marvel's fault, it's just how those kind of movies in general are these days.
Not really. Marvel movies know what they are doing. They're an assembly line films, making crowd pleasing movies one after another after another, following the same template. Any movie like that will always have a high RT score, because the RT score only measures if it was liked or not, not how much it was liked.

Any movie that tries to be be artistic, or do something different, or isn't built around proven fan service, will almost always get a lower RT score because, while some people will absolutely love it, some people will hate it too - so not as many people will "like" it.
That's why I prefer Metacritic's number scores and positive, mixed negative, breakdown and when I go Rotten Tomatoes, I've never even heard of the sources for the vast majority of their reviews, while I've heard of most of the ones that Metacritic uses. In case anyone is wondering The Batman has an 80, with 46 positive, 9 mixed, and 2 negative reviews.
Far From Home has a 69, with 39 positive, and 16 mixed.
 
Last edited:
Even when they are aping other genres they follow the exact same template. Same lighting, same colour pallette, same basic plots, same quips in the same places, same giant CGI battle against faceless opponents in the climax. They all look and sound and play the same. There was even a period where every movie had a scene where the hero would make a joke to the female lead before jumping out an airplane, followed by another joke by the people in the airplane. Hell, you can go on YouTube and pull up videos of people playing the movies side by side showing the same moments over and over.
I started noticing that around Phase 3 and that was when I started to lose interest. So many of them had an assembly line feel with silly humor and forgetable villains. Very few of them I care to see again. It's a shame because I really enjoyed Phase 1 and most of Phase 2 before it devolved into mindless action fare.

Phase 4 seems to be putting things back on track. The last Spiderman movie was really good, WandaVision, Loki and Falcon and the Winter Soldier were excellent miniseries and even though Eternals and Shan Chi aren't movies I care to see, I can at least respect them for doing something out of their comfort box for a change. And I'm definitely looking forward to Doctor Strange 2.
 
The complaint about Marvel movies having a similar look (in terms of color, lighting, etc.) never really bothered me because they're all in the same universe, so it makes sense that they'd look similar.

I've heard plenty of people say about The Eternals that Chloe Zhao gave it a look unlike any previous MCU movie, because she shot so heavily on location instead of relying on greenscreen and CGI environments. And I don't see a lot of common ground between the real-world political-thriller look of something like The Winter Soldier or Black Widow and the cartoony fantasy of Thor: Ragnarok or the Guardians movies.
 
I started noticing that around Phase 3 and that was when I started to lose interest. So many of them had an assembly line feel with silly humor and forgetable villains.

Agreed. After watching Thor Ragnarok, I was all "Didn't I just see this with Black Panther??"
 
Agreed. After watching Thor Ragnarok, I was all "Didn't I just see this with Black Panther??"
Yeah, Black Panther, if I had been able to sit thru that snooze fest, should have made me forget all about Avengers 2, Civil War, Thor: The Dark World etc.
 
Not really. Marvel movies know what they are doing. They're an assembly line films, making crowd pleasing movies one after another after another, following the same template. Any movie like that will always have a high RT score, because the RT score only measures if it was liked or not, not how much it was liked.

Some need--have an actual need for mob support of a film (or series), or they seem to crack at their foundations. It is not news or a secret that many MCU films rinse and repeat arcs, but some cannot move beyond trappings and believe each to be unique. The basic arcs of Thor and Black Panther are the same, all having the titular character lose an assumed or desired standing/position, said position challenged by a cutthroat insider and/or relative and/or pretender, and the hero having to prove himself worthy (literally in one case), while defeating the aforementioned cutthroat insider and/or relative and/or pretender. Rinse and repeat, and in the case of Doctor Strange it also copy+pasted from Batman Begins in a number of ways. Captain Marvel almost fell into this trap, saved by CM's struggles with a largely erased history plot.

To this day, the only truly original MCU film remains Captain America: The Winter Soldier with its predecessor a close second, and after that, the strongest entries were found on the Netflix series and recently, The Falcon/Captain America and The Winter Soldier on Disney+. There one was not saddled with the copy+pasting of plots and arcs seen/used so many times that you already knew how the story would end 25 minutes into it.

Any movie that tries to be be artistic, or do something different, or isn't built around proven fan service, will almost always get a lower RT score because, while some people will absolutely love it, some people will hate it too - so not as many people will "like" it.

Generally true.

I started noticing that around Phase 3 and that was when I started to lose interest. So many of them had an assembly line feel with silly humor and forgetable villains. Very few of them I care to see again. It's a shame because I really enjoyed Phase 1 and most of Phase 2 before it devolved into mindless action fare.

Agreed.
 
Lots of quiet voice whispering going on in this film. Everyone almost all the time. Anyone irritated by Burnham's use of the same better bring your patience pills along to the theater. lol


I have to wonder how many of them just gave 10/10 and haven't seen the movie yet...

Test audiences recently? Here is the breakdown so far:

All Critics (302) | Top Critics (67) | Fresh (256) | Rotten (46)
 
If anything, the genre diversity of the MCU just highlights how similar their films are. There's no reason, say, films about a billionaire technologist and a master of the mystic arts should be remotely similar, yet stylistically and tonally, they are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top