You're absolutely right that it's never wise to judge the citizenry of a nation based on the actions of the government.
Indeed. Iran springs to mind almost immediately.
You're absolutely right that it's never wise to judge the citizenry of a nation based on the actions of the government.
I think another important point is that our perspectives take different views of power relations based on our point of origin. Take the United Nations. One interesting thing I've observed is that non-Americans opposed to the UN (or at least to some of its policies and activities) tend to see the UN and the USA as practically synonymous. They see UN policy as an American agenda, or enforcing an American-centric worldview. On the other hand, Americans who dislike the UN or its policies tend to see it as a European-centric organization, and its influence as a European intrusion into American culture. So the non-Americans define the UN as basically "American" and the Americans define it as "non-American". So there we are.
It can definitely be hard on everyone - we have to remember, I think, that the average American in the street is in the same position as the average member-of-any-other-nation-in-the-street: their lives under the influence of other power blocs they may not like or consider alien. The Americans are in exactly the same boat as the rest of us.
Sometimes America-bashing is deserved. We're far from perfect. But often the criticisms are on based on envy or jealousy, in which case I just ignore it.
I hate to break this to you but the French don't really care about the USA or Americans. They certainly don't fret about the rampant francophobia in the USA. From my experience they have the same attitude as other Europeans; that the USA is a warmonger and the UK is its little bitch.
We've all heard the half-joking comments that compare the USA to a large, enthusiastic dog in a small room. It wags its tail and jumps up to lick people in the face and it can get a bit much in such a small, crowded space. And yes, sometimes it bites, and because it's so big those bites do more damage than might have been intended. America has been very prosperous, it's been economically and culturally dominant - it's a big dog indeed, at present. And its wagging tail and jumping to lick is irritating to many. But the Americans tend to be a culture proud of their shared national identity - and I don't mean that as either a complaint or a compliment, just an observation. They tend to be patriotic, proud of their identity as Americans, supportive of their national culture. So they'll be offended or resistant if you suggest they stop wagging their tail or bounding about. That's an imposition on their culture and their identity, and crosses (I think) a line that from their perspective renders you unacceptably intolerant. From an American perspective, who is anyone else to tell them not to embrace their cultural identity? Once the dog becomes a bit smaller, so to speak, I expect no-one will mind as much, because its wagging tail won't be knocking on people so much and causing (usually unintended) irritation.
And, if I may, I think these are difficult times for the USA. For most of its history it stood apart. It was founded as an escape from old European systems, embraced a new form of government and was the place where you went to find a new life. It's very much true that America was the place of new beginnings, the place where ethnic groups from across Europe and elsewhere emigrated, escaping the feuds and bickerings and petty hatreds that define so many. That's not me gushing - it should be clear I don't hold any "America is the greatest!" views - it's just the truth. America was a new beginning for so many. But now, America has been dragged back into the thick of it. They're having a rude awakening that the "old world" of a thousand ethnic squabbles and hatreds is still here, and they're part of it. The troubles with the Mexican border (which are identical to any number of immigration issues in countless European countries), the last few decades' adventures in the Middle East, the attack on New York which really shattered the sense that America was still the land that stood apart from all that. The USA, I think, is having a big cold splash in the face at present, trying to adapt to a world that's finally caught up with it. America isn't the land of opportunity any more, no longer the horizon where anyone can make a new life regardless of origin. They've been pulled (by their own success, their own promotion of globalization, their own economic strength), back into the world they escaped from in the first place. They bounded out into the world and now they're stuck with it. And they're still a very big dog. Big, jumpy, enthusiastic dog. Now also quite a shell-shocked dog, I think.
That's another reason not to judge too harshly - on the one hand, Americans are in the same boat as the rest of us, as I said upthread. But on the other, they have their historic expectations specific to their culture, which are undergoing some difficult transitions.
I'm not American, so my observations here might be total bull***t from their perspective, but that's the impression I get. I just think one of the reasons the world is having trouble with the USA is because Americans are having trouble with the world. They shot to power and influence very quickly, and are still adjusting.
We've all heard the half-joking comments that compare the USA to a large, enthusiastic dog in a small room.
...
They shot to power and influence very quickly, and are still adjusting.
I'm glad that, in general, French people don't hate Americans.
Oh, a lot of anti-American sentiment in the world is jealousy, no doubt about it. At this time in History, America is the dominant culture and that inevitably breeds resentment.
Well said, my friend.
Resentment and jealousy are not the same thing.
There is the fact that Americans often have absolutely no idea of how other cultures function, and many don't even try. In the media, other countries get ridiculed to no end, but when someone makes fun of the USA, it's the fucking end of the world (Another thing that got me in trouble was my constant swearing).
I get confused between patriotism and nationalism. What I mean is I can't see a distinction. In my country there is a clear distinction between loyalty to our country (almost universal) and largely mindless chauvinism, where people stick 'proud to be [insert country]' on their cars and so forth, as if they had achieved something by being born there. In my opinion the only people who can claim this are immigrants who actively chose to come here.
Of course, aside from the indigenous peoples, everyone in the USA is from immigrant stock, so that's why it has become so important to declare nationality.
Of course, aside from the indigenous peoples, everyone in the USA is from immigrant stock, so that's why it has become so important to declare nationality.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.