I watch the Tour de France, it's the only sporting event I've ever taken an interest in. I love it, the strategy, the scenery, the stage by stage excitement. But people always make snide, mean comments to me about it because they think it's elitest or boring or filled with nothing but doping athletes.
In summary: Animals are less effort to know... & thereby, in my clearly minority opinion, less meaningful to know
- an animal will always give you a second chance
- lies are a concept unknown to almost all animals
- an animal will always show you clearly what it thinks of you and what it feels at the moment
- an animal is always straightforward and doesn't beat around the bush or cheat
- an animal loves you as you are, totally and unconditionally.
and in almost all but the most recent times, they were kept to service mankind in multitudes of ways. I think the term "pet" really only surfaces a few hundred years ago, as in petting, which is derivative of petty. Until very recently, a dog & cat had a point beyond just being a thing to give affection to, but not in the modern world, unless you have a legit service animalAccording to recent findings, dogs have been our pets for over 30,000 years. So if there is anything abnormal about having pets then we've been abnormal for all that time.
Me, not only do I detest so-called "reality TV" as much as you do, I remain firmly convinced that it's all fake. That which is sold to the public as "reality TV" is as pre-planned, pre-arranged, pre-screened, pre-sifted, and scripted as any other show out there.
The simple fact is, dogs and cats live best when under a human’s care. They can’t survive in the wild.
The kind of health benefits that come from interaction, that would be even better were it from another human being, which although it may not be easy, is far more beneficial & well worth any efforts to get it or give it, or see that people who need it are getting it. It's just a substitution for what we really need, & in that way enables us more to go without imho
And I'm in no way trying to say there isn't and hasn't been shared affections/bonds between people & pets. What I do question is that if that shared affection is sufficient cause for the whole of humanity, on mass, to breed numerous animal species for only that reason, (For us to enjoy) which is what we predominantly do now, when previously there were other purposes for general individuals to have them, on top of growing to like them... was my point. They were essential in helping human kind, in a time when it needed all the help it could get, to haul, herd, hunt etc... Our vast age of advancement is not one of those times imho, and now they are just, another creature comfort luxury item, by & large.Well, in Homer's Odyssey: The only one that recognizes Ulysses after twenty years of absence is his own dog and the joy of seeing him kills the poor animal. So that means that even then, IE millennia ago, they acknowledged the deep affection that links a man to his dog. Dogs were already then, not just something you used for practical purposes.
I'm not trying to disprove whatever benefits they can offer to our overall well being, that mostly revolve around making us more content & in contentment thereby potentially even leading to better health, which I feel like we could do largely for ourselves at this point, or better yet, for one another, in lieu thereofThere are good studies that show benefits to blood pressure and stress hormones related to just petting an animal. There are people who get exercise with their dogs that they would not get otherwise. And there are, anecdotally, people like my wife and me who have very strong and supportive family and social networks, but who also find great pleasure, enjoyment and stress-reducing benefit in having a pet around.
Sometimes I feel like I would rather be friends with animals than with people.
Kor
I'm an atheist, living in Texas. I couldn't possibly have a more "unusual opinion" if I tried.
I'm an atheist, Democrat, sports-hating, non-drinker who has no interest in guns, living in Texas. And I have no desire to own a truck.
Needless to say, I spend a lot of time alone.![]()
twin soul here, auntie. Only difference is that I loathe beer which is considered the paramount of perversion in Bavaria.
Honest, I'd rather swim in a sewer than take a sip of that disgusting brew.
@Discofan: I share your catholic parent prob. My sis and I are both atheists, I openly, she secretly as she fears my parents would freak out if they knew.
Coincidentially, one of my best friends is a catholic priest but he accepts my opinion (and I his). I wish my parents would be just half as tolerant as he is!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.