• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Unseen TOS....

There was a version that had howitzers out the side and tiny Convair shuttles. Rumor has it that a model of same put off JFK. He might have gone for it otherwise.
 
While perusing the net I came across a couple of Romulan War Earth ship designs from something called Pacific 201. One was an interesting take on the Daedalus-class and the other was a combat patrol ship. They were done to be consistent with ENT design aesthetics (lots of greebling), but the general concepts were very interesting. They don’t look much Jefferies-esque, but I really appreciate the thinking put into them.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
While perusing the net I came across a couple of Romulan War Earth ship designs from something called Pacific 201. One was an interesting take on the Daedalus-class and the other was a combat patrol ship. They were done to be consistent with ENT design aesthetics (lots of greebling), but the general concepts were very interesting. They don’t look much Jefferies-esque, but I really appreciate the thinking put into them.
The design work on 201 was excellent, and in line with the more archaic feel, but yes to the ENT design reference. I just liked it overall.
 
I like that it (apparently) has two clusters of impulse rockets. I mean, yeah, it's cool that the engineering hull can have flames coming out the back of it (see the cover art by James Bama to James Blish's first Star Trek novelization [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_(Bantam_Books), https://www.startrek.com/article/james-bamas-trek]). But it also draws a red circle around what has always been an issue with the Constitution-class design regarding both sparsity of impulse rockets and the stardrive section not having impulse rockets of its own.
 
While perusing the net I came across a couple of Romulan War Earth ship designs from something called Pacific 201. One was an interesting take on the Daedalus-class and the other was a combat patrol ship. They were done to be consistent with ENT design aesthetics (lots of greebling), but the general concepts were very interesting. They don’t look much Jefferies-esque, but I really appreciate the thinking put into them.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
For some reason, when I view the Pacific's dome it reminds me of a Droid. I prefer my Star Trek to be more in line with Star Trek designs, and I agree with you it doesn't look much like Matt Jefferies.
 
You might've seen this before, but when I did an Earth-Romulan war game pitch for Playmates I used that Jein model (archived here) as a starting point. You can see something like it in the top game mockup...

6751536443_4e9c0fe6c2_b.jpg


...which led to the sketches below... at the upper left of which is another class of ship of in that vein, which I showed to Andy Probert who suggested it might make a better fighter, so I ran with that.

3427923969_8d9ac1915e.jpg

Illustrator Mark Farinas did a prequel comic book where he constructed a story about a Daedalus crew. He also drew up ship designs where he depicts his vision of what the Romulans ships may have looked like. For me, I think it's accurate to what I believe those vessels looked like. IMO very Matt Jefferies.

http://trekcomic.com/no-good-deed-page-1/
 
Illustrator Mark Farinas did a prequel comic book where he constructed a story about a Daedalus crew. He also drew up ship designs where he depicts his vision of what the Romulans ships may have looked like. For me, I think it's accurate to what I believe those vessels looked like. IMO very Matt Jefferies.

Er, the Romulan ship in that comic is the same ship that Greg Jein designed for the Star Trek Chronology (other than the dreadnought, which is also clearly based on Jein's design.)
 
OH!!! He's a member of this forum??? Oh wow, I stand corrected.

@Mark 2000 I meant, you are a great artist and I value your take of TOS. I wish the studios would have a sense of nostalgia and respect for Matt Jefferies work like you did.

Er, the Romulan ship in that comic is the same ship that Greg Jein designed for the Star Trek Chronology (other than the dreadnought, which is also clearly based on Jein's design.)

OH!!! That is interesting. Its a wonderful design.
 
This is a quote from Shaw in another thread. It is so on point.
On the broader subject of science fiction and Star Trek, writers/producers are more likely to date their work by attempting to ground it with current technology. This is best illustrated by the evolution (or more accurately, de-evolution) of the Enterprise since TOS.

The first big step backwards being putting reaction control thrusters all over the refit in TMP. While this was a valid solution for 70's spacecraft, it shouldn't have been applied to a starship from hundreds of years in the future. This got even more ridiculous with the Kelvin Enterprise being covered with rockets.

The best way to get a feel for how to approach the subject would be to take something like our current submarines/carriers and ask how someone of the 18th century would have explained their functionality using the science of that period. Would someone from that era call what we take for granted science fiction or fantasy? To them we move ships the size of cities at unimaginable speeds for years on a few pounds of a magic rock. They didn't have the science to explain what we do... just like we shouldn't have the science to explain what happens in Star Trek. Trying to shoehorn in current tech into Star Trek (like the aforementioned reaction control thrusters) is like adding sails to a carrier.

In my opinion, good science fiction in Star Trek comes from internal consistency of the functionality of the technology, not trying to provide how it is possible.
 
Looking back where I had explored this previously.

Many years ago this was a concept for the Valiant I worked up in Photoshop.

Valiant2.gif
FicPic215.gif


I essentially took the hull of the spaceship Luna from the 1950 film Destination: Moon and started playing with it. At the time I didn't think too much about it beyond that. My basic idea was the Valiant was initially a fast relativistic ship that was fitted with an early form of space warp drive. I like the name used in the Trek novel Federation where it's referred to as a superimpeller. My thinking was that in the early years of interstellar starflight different configurations were experimented with to find an optimal design rather than assuming two nacelles were always there from the beginning and throughout until the present.

My revised version of the Valiant was worked up as a 3D model sometime later. Although the ringship idea is not something we as fans saw until the ringship Enterprise glimpsed in TMP it is an idea Matt Jefferies explored while working his way toward a final design for the Enterprise. So it’s not inconceivable MJ could reuse the ringship concept for an older Earth ship.
Vshot3a_zpsb010b06b.gif

Valiant-22_zpsa496a5e2.gif







Vsaga3_zpsbe29e0ab.gif

Vsaga4_zpsf4492a99.gif

Vsaga5_zps51857b2a.gif

Vsaga6_zps88915729.gif

Vsaga7_zps6d636d0e.gif

Awesome work!! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top