While I’ll not be around to see it, I’m hoping that, by the 22nd century, people will have come to their senses and Microsoft will be a quaint little footnote in the history books.
Books? What are these "books" you speak of? Our approved historical truefacts are downloaded into our brainbanks each morning.While I’ll not be around to see it, I’m hoping that, by the 22nd century, people will have come to their senses and Microsoft will be a quaint little footnote in the history books.
I saw that episode of Stargate SG-1. Not my idea of high society.Books? What are these "books" you speak of? Our approved historical truefacts are downloaded into our brainbanks each morning.
![]()
The Romulan Way by Diane Duane and Peter Morwood is an interesting book, but for me the most interesting part was the history of the Rihannsu, the name the Romulans gave themselves (cool name, too). It recounts the circumstances that compelled the Romulans to leave Vulcan as well as the perilous journey to their new home.
If I recall correctly more than one ship departs Vulcan, but few survive to make planetfall.
I want to congratulate you-you made a rounded primary hull appealing and more believable. Well done.
Huh. Interesting. I need to see if that's true.It is said that the Parthenon doesn’t have a straight line in it…it just makes you think it’s a box.
Interesting adaptation. I think that makes sense as to why it appeals to my eye overall. A full sphere never sits right in terms of starship designs, while having more flatter space is far more appealing. Again, completely my eyeballs being funky, or possibly not sphere shaped*At some point I will revisit that design to tweak it.
Note of curiousity: the spherical hull is not a perfect sphere. I actually flattened it by about five or so percent. Such a subtle difference seemed to make a world of difference (in my eyes) in terms of overall look. A perfect sphere made the design look awkward while a slightly flattened sphere (or really fat ovoid) just seemed to work.
Huh. Interesting. I need to see if that's true.
Yeah, I just found the information. Fascinating!Very true. An artistic deception. The lack of straight lines makes it look straighter. There are entire books on this. They say it better.
Like the East India Corporation?While I’ll not be around to see it, I’m hoping that, by the 22nd century, people will have come to their senses and Microsoft will be a quaint little footnote in the history books.
Everyone says that but are they including the floor?, the roof?That’s brilliant.
It is said that the Parthenon doesn’t have a straight line in it…it just makes you think it’s a box.
Everyone says that but are they including the floor?, the roof?
Level isn't the same thing as straight.Yes. Not a level line in the building.
Wishful thinking on my part, to be sure. That's how it will probably go in reality. They're both just as evil.Like the East India Corporation?
What would the Romulan vessels look like in a non - continuity basis*, would those ships appear smaller than the BOP from "Balance of Terror" or something compact and bulky?In the real world we would see multiple designs for different purposes. On a television series, particularly one of the 1960s, we wouldn’t get that luxury.
Presently I’m pondering mid 22nd era warships for the Earth-Romulan War.
And they know this isn't because of settling? I mean, it was built a few thousand years ago.Yes. Not a level line in the building.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.