Okay, so a question for anyone who hates a particular class...
Can you say specifically what is wrong with it? I mean, something more than "it looks terrible."
Point is, the Enterprise-E is a gorram travesty, yet peeps here accept it!!The Abramsprise is almost good for me. The two bits I don't like are that the neck comes out of the middle of the engineering hull, it should be further forward. And the undercut on the bottom starts too far forward. If those were fixed, it would look really good.
Not every peep...
I think it's a horrible mismash of the Excelsior, Intrepid and Constitution-refit classes. The single worse design of all major Starfleet vessels.
And the difference is?I'm Canadian.Silly silly British man.
We don't get involved in soccer riots for one thing.And the difference is?I'm Canadian.Silly silly British man.
That's SO funny!!!^^ There must be a missprint there. For ST09 it should be Constipated-class.
Okay, so a question for anyone who hates a particular class...
Can you say specifically what is wrong with it? I mean, something more than "it looks terrible."
Point is, the Enterprise-E is a gorram travesty, yet peeps here accept it!!
Not every peep...
I think it's a horrible mismash of the Excelsior, Intrepid and Constitution-refit classes. The single worse design of all major Starfleet vessels.
Think you have some pretty good explanations above.
As far as the Enterprise from Star Trek 2009. The proportions of it feel 'wrong'. I don't necessarily think they were that far away from having something workable. Re-work the nacelles and move them farther apart would be a tremendous start.
That's always been my impression. It looks as if someone asked Harley J. Earl to design a starship. While he was drunk.. . . The JJ-Prize, however, looks like someone glued together the debris from a 1950s automobile accident.
That's always been my impression. It looks as if someone asked Harley J. Earl to design a starship. While he was drunk.. . . The JJ-Prize, however, looks like someone glued together the debris from a 1950s automobile accident.
That's a verrrrry interesting point.Si. I'm still trying to understand why everyone said "that old 1960s-designed ship won't fly with a 2009 audience - it needs to be redesigned," and the redesign looks like a 1956 Cadillac.
Almost exactly the opposite opinion here.The Enterprise-E is beautiful in its proportions, but ugly in detail. Like others pointed out, the design is way too busy to be considered beautiful. But it's rather elegant in proportions - that is, saucer size, nacelles, placement, ratio, etc.
The ST09 Enterprise is the exact opposite. Clean and beautiful up close, but an awkward kludge viewed as a whole.
And it needs repeating IMO.That's a verrrrry interesting point.Si. I'm still trying to understand why everyone said "that old 1960s-designed ship won't fly with a 2009 audience - it needs to be redesigned," and the redesign looks like a 1956 Cadillac.![]()
Don't you believe that for a second. A lot of the complaints about the nuEnterprise are tied into complaints about Star Trek XI itself, but the Enterprise-E received a fair amount of criticism too when it first came out and more with each subsequent film it appeared in.To many here, the Abramsprise sucks, but the Enterprise-E is acceptable????
Please, help me with this.![]()
But as with pretty much every starship that has borne the name Enterprise onscreen, the Enterprise-E was ultimately designed by committee with the producers eventually having the final say. Along the way, multiple versions of the ship were considered and then abandoned for various reasons.
http://www.starshipdatalink.net/art/images/dee-3.gif
The image in that link is the one Rick Sternbach drew Thanksgiving turkey booties on.
The Enterprise-E is beautiful in its proportions, but ugly in detail. Like others pointed out, the design is way too busy to be considered beautiful. But it's rather elegant in proportions - that is, saucer size, nacelles, placement, ratio, etc.
I suspect the major reasons are twofold:To many here, the Abramsprise sucks, but the Enterprise-E is acceptable????
Please, help me with this.![]()
To reject either ship is to reject the movies it appears in
Okay, so a question for anyone who hates a particular class...
Can you say specifically what is wrong with it? I mean, something more than "it looks terrible."
TOS Enterprise - A
TMP-TWOK Enterprise - A
TVH-TUC Enterprise - B (I hate the interior)
TNG Enterprise - B (used to hate it, but it's grown on me)
DS9 Defiant - A (convincingly different Starfleet design)
VOY Voyager - F (ungainly and simply runt ugly)
GEN Enterprise B - D (an ungainly design made even uglier)
TNG "Yesterday's Enterprise" Enterprise C - C (unremarkable)
FC-NEM Enterprise E - C (unremarkable fanboy wet dream)
ENT Enterprise - C (not horrible, but not convincing as a century pre TOS)
ST09 Enterprise - F (should be called 1701F for "fucked up" Enterprise)
A
Constitution Class - Star Trek: The Original Series
Galaxy Class - Star Trek: The Next Generation
Ambassador Class - Star Trek: The Next Generation
B
NX Class - Star Trek: Enterprise
Excelsior Class - Star Trek III
Constitution Class refit - Star Trek: The Motion Picture
C
Defiant Class - Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
Nebula Class - Star Trek: The Next Generation
D
Oberth Class - Star Trek III
Intrepid Class - Star Trek: Voyager
F
Sovereign Class - Star Trek: First Contact
Constitution Class - Star Trek 2009
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.