• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Umm... ship design question-

Okay, so a question for anyone who hates a particular class...

Can you say specifically what is wrong with it? I mean, something more than "it looks terrible."
 
Okay, so a question for anyone who hates a particular class...

Can you say specifically what is wrong with it? I mean, something more than "it looks terrible."

The Abramsprise is almost good for me. The two bits I don't like are that the neck comes out of the middle of the engineering hull, it should be further forward. And the undercut on the bottom starts too far forward. If those were fixed, it would look really good.
Point is, the Enterprise-E is a gorram travesty, yet peeps here accept it!!

Not every peep...

I think it's a horrible mismash of the Excelsior, Intrepid and Constitution-refit classes. The single worse design of all major Starfleet vessels.

Think you have some pretty good explanations above.

As far as the Enterprise from Star Trek 2009. The proportions of it feel 'wrong'. I don't necessarily think they were that far away from having something workable. Re-work the nacelles and move them farther apart would be a tremendous start.
 
Silly silly British man.
I'm Canadian.
And the difference is?

I'd like the E better if the area around the bridge and trialing aft was smoother, also highlighting the lifeboats has never made sense to me, why identify their location (or the location of anything) to a potential enemy?

Would look nicer in white or white-blue instead of gray.

As far as the mega-prise from ST Eleven, I thought the saucer section, taken in isolation, was just fine.
 
Surprisingly, even to me, I had no problem with the 1701-E. At least it looked like an integrated design, well thought-out, if a bit over-detailed.

The JJ-Prize, however, looks like someone glued together the debris from a 1950s automobile accident.
 
Okay, so a question for anyone who hates a particular class...

Can you say specifically what is wrong with it? I mean, something more than "it looks terrible."

Point is, the Enterprise-E is a gorram travesty, yet peeps here accept it!!

Not every peep...

I think it's a horrible mismash of the Excelsior, Intrepid and Constitution-refit classes. The single worse design of all major Starfleet vessels.

Think you have some pretty good explanations above.

As far as the Enterprise from Star Trek 2009. The proportions of it feel 'wrong'. I don't necessarily think they were that far away from having something workable. Re-work the nacelles and move them farther apart would be a tremendous start.

And which parts of the Sov look like an excelsior class? I've never seen it. And I get the similarity to the Intrepid class, the lack of a neck between the saucer and engineering hull, but I don't see why that is "horrible".
 
. . . The JJ-Prize, however, looks like someone glued together the debris from a 1950s automobile accident.
That's always been my impression. It looks as if someone asked Harley J. Earl to design a starship. While he was drunk.
 
. . . The JJ-Prize, however, looks like someone glued together the debris from a 1950s automobile accident.
That's always been my impression. It looks as if someone asked Harley J. Earl to design a starship. While he was drunk.

Si. I'm still trying to understand why everyone said "that old 1960s-designed ship won't fly with a 2009 audience - it needs to be redesigned," and the redesign looks like a 1956 Cadillac.
 
Si. I'm still trying to understand why everyone said "that old 1960s-designed ship won't fly with a 2009 audience - it needs to be redesigned," and the redesign looks like a 1956 Cadillac.
That's a verrrrry interesting point.:techman:
 
The Enterprise-E is beautiful in its proportions, but ugly in detail. Like others pointed out, the design is way too busy to be considered beautiful. But it's rather elegant in proportions - that is, saucer size, nacelles, placement, ratio, etc.

The ST09 Enterprise is the exact opposite. Clean and beautiful up close, but an awkward kludge viewed as a whole.
 
The Enterprise-E is beautiful in its proportions, but ugly in detail. Like others pointed out, the design is way too busy to be considered beautiful. But it's rather elegant in proportions - that is, saucer size, nacelles, placement, ratio, etc.

The ST09 Enterprise is the exact opposite. Clean and beautiful up close, but an awkward kludge viewed as a whole.
Almost exactly the opposite opinion here.:guffaw:
 
The E looked great in some shots but horrible in others! The Abramsprise is terrible. I have alwats like the constitution refit and the miranda. For TNG era I like the Akira
 
To many here, the Abramsprise sucks, but the Enterprise-E is acceptable????:eek:
Please, help me with this.:shifty:
Don't you believe that for a second. A lot of the complaints about the nuEnterprise are tied into complaints about Star Trek XI itself, but the Enterprise-E received a fair amount of criticism too when it first came out and more with each subsequent film it appeared in.

But as with pretty much every starship that has borne the name Enterprise onscreen, the Enterprise-E was ultimately designed by committee with the producers eventually having the final say. Along the way, multiple versions of the ship were considered and then abandoned for various reasons.
http://www.starshipdatalink.net/art/images/dee-3.gif

The image in that link is the one Rick Sternbach drew Thanksgiving turkey booties on.

Wasn't me. Perhaps you were thinking of Rick Berman.
 
C.E. Evans mentioned Herman Zimmerman. Could have been him. Or it could have been someone who overheard his comment. I read it is Star Trek the Magazine, I believe.
 
The Enterprise-E is beautiful in its proportions, but ugly in detail. Like others pointed out, the design is way too busy to be considered beautiful. But it's rather elegant in proportions - that is, saucer size, nacelles, placement, ratio, etc.

That's a good way to describe it.
 
To many here, the Abramsprise sucks, but the Enterprise-E is acceptable????:eek:
Please, help me with this.:shifty:
I suspect the major reasons are twofold:
1) there is less opportunity to reject the Enterprise-E. To reject either ship is to reject the movies it appears in, and it is easier to do that with one that is fairly upfront about being set in an alternate universe.
2) The Soverign Class shows influence of other ships of similar era, like the Intrepid Class (Voyager). Whereas the Abramsprise is supposed to be a variant take on a ship we already saw.
 
Okay, so a question for anyone who hates a particular class...

Can you say specifically what is wrong with it? I mean, something more than "it looks terrible."


My opinion of the 2009 Enterprise.
Link

TOS Enterprise - A
TMP-TWOK Enterprise - A
TVH-TUC Enterprise - B (I hate the interior)
TNG Enterprise - B (used to hate it, but it's grown on me)
DS9 Defiant - A (convincingly different Starfleet design)
VOY Voyager - F (ungainly and simply runt ugly)
GEN Enterprise B - D (an ungainly design made even uglier)
TNG "Yesterday's Enterprise" Enterprise C - C (unremarkable)
FC-NEM Enterprise E - C (unremarkable fanboy wet dream)
ENT Enterprise - C (not horrible, but not convincing as a century pre TOS)
ST09 Enterprise - F (should be called 1701F for "fucked up" Enterprise)

A

Constitution Class - Star Trek: The Original Series
Galaxy Class - Star Trek: The Next Generation
Ambassador Class - Star Trek: The Next Generation

B

NX Class - Star Trek: Enterprise
Excelsior Class - Star Trek III
Constitution Class refit - Star Trek: The Motion Picture

C

Defiant Class - Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
Nebula Class - Star Trek: The Next Generation

D

Oberth Class - Star Trek III
Intrepid Class - Star Trek: Voyager

F

Sovereign Class - Star Trek: First Contact
Constitution Class - Star Trek 2009


Enterprises:
A+ - 1701E
A - 1701D, 1701C
A- - 1701 (Refit), 1701A
B - 1701B
D+ - 1701 (TOS)
F - 1701 (2009)

Other Starfleet Ships:

A+ - Defiant Class, Intrepid Class, Akira Class
A- - Nova Class, NX Class (Yeah, it's Earth's Starfleet and not the Federation's, but I'll rate it anyway.)
B+ - Nebula Class
B - Miranda Class (And all her variants), Prometheus Class
B- - Norway Class, Steamrunner Class, Saber Class
C - Constellation Class
D+ - Oberth Class, Olympic Class
F - Daedalus

This is how I feel now, my opinions do shift...from time to time.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top