• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Uhura replacing McCoy/Bones?

I recall one episode of Voyager where the crew had to go on a geology mission. Instead of introducing a ship's geologist, they picked main characters who had taken geology for one semester and Neelix because he went in a cave once.

Budgetwise, of course, they usually need to maximise the use of the contracted feature actors.
There was also the premise in Voyager that half the trained and qualified Starfleet crew complement had been lost during the catastrophic trip to the Delta quadrant in the pilot episode, necessitating their joining of forces with the Maquis crew and leading to duty shifts by some characters in areas other than that of their specialty (e.g., Tom Paris doing some duty in Sick Bay because he'd received some secondary medical training.) Voyager fudged on this often enough that it was good to see them at least trying to remember that "Oh, hey, we probably don't have a dedicated ship's geologist any more - he was killed in 'Caretaker, Part 1,' right?"

They didn't lose as many crewmen as you think but another example is Ensign Wildman, an honest-to-god science officer. Basically they used her once or twice a year as part of the latest mommy in space story. She never got to be involved in any science plot that didn't also involve her role as a mother - that would always be shuffled off to Janeway, Kim, or Seven.
 
of course it make sense as the studio hopes to capture that "Twilight" vibe by giving Spock a love interest, which makes me believe even more that they just don't get it.
 
of course it make sense as the studio hopes to capture that "Twilight" vibe by giving Spock a love interest, which makes me believe even more that they just don't get it.


"Twilight" has nothing to do with it. But please, enlighten us as to what "They" don't get. . .


~FS
 
You need a sarcasm smiley on that last comment. It's more accurate to say that a love interest has never been so in our faces in any of the TOS movies but even that isn't quite true - we had Decker and Ilia - but in most of the movies the 'romance' element was very understated - we had implied sexual tension between Spock and Saavik, flirtation between Kirk and Gillian, and Spock's permanent boner whenever Valeris was in the room.
 
of course it make sense as the studio hopes to capture that "Twilight" vibe by giving Spock a love interest, which makes me believe even more that they just don't get it.


omg...omg....omg...my worst nightmare. Twilight and Star Trek in the same sentense.

please dont ever compare twilight and star trek to each other ever ever again.

twilight is just about the worst series ever.

I also doubt the writers paired S/U together to get the twilight base....every movie , regardless of its genre have always had a romance.

twilight has one of the WORST romance stories ever.
 
of course it make sense as the studio hopes to capture that "Twilight" vibe by giving Spock a love interest, which makes me believe even more that they just don't get it.


omg...omg....omg...my worst nightmare. Twilight and Star Trek in the same sentense.

please dont ever compare twilight and star trek to each other ever ever again.

twilight is just about the worst series ever.

I also doubt the writers paired S/U together to get the twilight base....every movie , regardless of its genre have always had a romance.

twilight has one of the WORST romance stories ever.
Uh-uh.

Remember what happened the last time you got all wound up on that subject, and put your teen-ranty Twilight hate-posts in a blog entry instead.

Not here.
 
of course it make sense as the studio hopes to capture that "Twilight" vibe by giving Spock a love interest, which makes me believe even more that they just don't get it.


omg...omg....omg...my worst nightmare. Twilight and Star Trek in the same sentense.

please dont ever compare twilight and star trek to each other ever ever again.

twilight is just about the worst series ever.

I also doubt the writers paired S/U together to get the twilight base....every movie , regardless of its genre have always had a romance.

twilight has one of the WORST romance stories ever.
Uh-uh.

Remember what happened the last time you got all wound up on that subject, and put your teen-ranty Twilight hate-posts in a blog entry instead.

Not here.

Dont worry...it would not happen again. But come on?

Star Trek vs Twilight?:scream:
 
Real Vampires don't eat Qui...er... don't sparkle. ;)

I think it's fine to upgrade Uhura to a starring role, I didn't really notice her pushing McCoy aside getting more screen time than him though.

And why would Uhura want to replace McCoy's Bones, anyways?:shrug:
 
It should be done. Star Trek treats women like crap, they should have a character that is front and center, that can do more than open hailing frequencies.
 
It should be done. Star Trek treats women like crap, they should have a character that is front and center, that can do more than open hailing frequencies.
That almost sound dirty the way you say it :eek:

I agree, it's good to see a female TOS character with a bit of equality
 
why no one ever say that Scotty has replaced McCoy?
because is it me or he's getting more action? especially in the last movie.
 
You need a sarcasm smiley on that last comment. It's more accurate to say that a love interest has never been so in our faces in any of the TOS movies but even that isn't quite true - we had Decker and Ilia - but in most of the movies the 'romance' element was very understated - we had implied sexual tension between Spock and Saavik, flirtation between Kirk and Gillian, and Spock's permanent boner whenever Valeris was in the room.

Spock and Saavik - no way
Gillian was just humouring Kirk
Maybe there was something between Spock and Valeris :eek:
 
Spock and Saavik - no way

Certain (unused) scenes were filmed to suggest sexual tension between Saavik and David (the ShoWest presentation trailer; also explored in the novelizations) and Saavik and Kirk (the alternate elevator scene featured in the ABC network US television premiere).
 
why no one ever say that Scotty has replaced McCoy?
because is it me or he's getting more action? especially in the last movie.

That is interesting, isn't it? It's definitely "food for thought."

He had more screen time and more to do than McCoy for sure, but no one complains...
 
I don't understand:

"Uhura is dating Spock! That's Sexist!" :scream:

"Uhura is an angry black bitch for not being a doormat!" :scream:

What is this, the 19th century!? :wtf:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top