Yes I know. I was responding to Nerys Myk's question.FleetLord said:
But why did they drop it is why i'm asking.
I agree, that's probably the dramatic reason for the change. Your "in universe" explanation sounds as plausible (and similar) to the other "in universe" reasons I've heard over the years.FleetLord said:
I'm guessing the 'Starfleet' sounded cooler.
jon1701 said:
I suppose you could argue that there were two organisations running concurrently, and one (UESPA) was gradually being phased out.
Doesnt the episode refer to the ANTARES as a probe ship or something? Maybe UESPA had been in charge of probe ships and Starfleet the other ships.
When two companies merge, they often use the same name for a bit before one is rebranded.
Bones said:
This keeps things simple in my personal canon.
That is so true. All the inconsistencies of STAR TREK make it so much more enjoyable. Just look how many posts there are in this forum that deal with some canon debate.Personally, I like the little inconsistencies that crop up in fictional universes. Rather than resulting in a disruption of my suspension of disbelief, it actually makes it feel more real to me, since our planet is loaded with these little inconsistencies.
Professor Moriarty said:
On the show in at least two episodes:
(1) In "Charlie X", Captain Kirk makes a log entry immediately after Charlie makes the Antares go boom. In his voiceover, he tersely reports that "You-spah headquarters has been notified of the mysterious destruction of the Antares."
(2) In "Tomorrow is Yesterday", Captain Kirk explains to Captain Christopher that the Enterprise's operational authority is the United Earth Space Probe Agency. Christopher replies "United Earth?" in puzzlement.
So yes, there are "canonical" on-screen references to UESPA in classic Star Trek.
That storyline has been debated around here before...its verasity is questionable considering The Naked Time's writer never confirmed it. For me...the jury is still out on that one.Nerys Myk said:
("Tomorrow Is Yesterday" was supposed to follow "Naked Time" as part of two episode storyline)
Kagan said:
That storyline has been debated around here before...its verasity is questionable considering The Naked Time's writer never confirmed it. For me...the jury is still out on that one.Nerys Myk said:
("Tomorrow Is Yesterday" was supposed to follow "Naked Time" as part of two episode storyline)
Anywho...what is the earliest reference to "Star Fleet" in production order, airdate order, stardate order...?
Ceridwen Troy said:
We know according to Star Trek - Voyager: "One Small Step" that UESPA's founding predated even the founding of the United Earth government, sine UESPA was responsible for the first manned mission to Mars.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.