• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Two more LCARS schematics

Here's an attempt at a low-profile version of the drop-launched Spirit of Opportunity:


DKnu.png
 
Perhaps I don't understand what a powersystem is.
That much is now obvious.



NO I was not the one that posted a link to the LCARS database for a FR connected to the chamber.
I certainly would like to see it though.

The device marked "FG" on "S-Deck" in the blueprint here. Detailed explanation in the paragraph for S-Deck here.

I remember you making a clear declaritive not an implication.
You remember incorrectly.

The shuttle of the Enterprise D didn't not have warp drive.
We don't know that for sure. Probert's original design certainly DID have a warp core. From dialog, we at least know the Type-7 shuttle had a "dilithium chamber," which at the very least suggests a dilithium chamber is a useful part of the impulse engines and probably an intermix as well.
 
From dialog, we at least know the Type-7 shuttle had a "dilithium chamber"

Hmh? Sounds interesting but unfamiliar... Any hints as to where this dialogue occurred?

Timo Saloniemi
 
From dialog, we at least know the Type-7 shuttle had a "dilithium chamber"

Hmh? Sounds interesting but unfamiliar... Any hints as to where this dialogue occurred?
It was just after Jake's engine stalls and the alarm goes off in his cockpit (was he trying to go to warp? I don't know what the hell he was up to...) we see Geordi at the Conn saying "He's unbalanced the dilithium reaction." Afterwards Riker adds "All he's got left is maneuvering jets." For some reason unbalancing his dilithium chamber stalls the impulse engines as well as any FTL capability the shuttle (probably) has.

I've always felt this is what the intermix chamber was originally for. It's sort of a "common drive shaft" that the fusion reactors and antimatter reactors can both use to power either the impulse engines or the warp drives.

I've just realized that even the TNG Enterprise has a candidate for this feature: the nondescript, seldom-used white column running parallel to the warp core with segmented joints (the thing the bandits were siphoning trilithium from in "Starship Mine"). That could well be an "intermix chamber" a la TMP, especially since the top of it could very well be connected to the main impulse engine.
 
That much is now obvious.

Aswell as your contempt.
If that was obvious as you say then your usefullness in providing a prognosis for the situation was nonexistent.



NO I was not the one that posted a link to the LCARS database for a FR connected to the chamber.
I certainly would like to see it though.

The device marked "FG" on "S-Deck" in the blueprint here. Detailed explanation in the paragraph for S-Deck here[/QUOTE]

It's 1701-A not the refit.

You remember incorrectly.
I wouldn't be surprised.
I also wouldn't be surprised if you were wrong either.
You make many declarations in your explanations of your speculations

We don't know that for sure. Probert's original design certainly DID have a warp core. From dialog, we at least know the Type-7 shuttle had a "dilithium chamber," which at the very least suggests a dilithium chamber is a useful part of the impulse engines and probably an intermix as well.

Actually you're right along this line.
While it certainly seems the shuttles are impulse only...some of the later season shows...specificly the one where Worf enters many different realities, Riker says that the shuttles "warp" engines may have caused the tear in realities.
 
Thanks for the "Coming of Age" pointers!

I've always felt this is what the intermix chamber was originally for. It's sort of a "common drive shaft" that the fusion reactors and antimatter reactors can both use to power either the impulse engines or the warp drives.

However, this might be a feature present only in compact shuttlecraft, which cannot afford (volume-wise or mass-wise) the otherwise more economical and sensible system of separate powerplants for impulse and warp drives.

While it certainly seems the shuttles are impulse only

Does it? They do have prominent engine nacelles just like their warp-capable motherships, they do seem to be able to move from star to star without much comment in at least one episode of each show, and I'm aware of only a single Star Trek plot where it might have been relevant that the shuttle wasn't warp-capable.

That plot'd be "Q Who?" where Q hijacks Picard in a Type 7 shuttle, and our other heroes initially conduct a search within a volume with the radius a vehicle "without warp drive" might cover. However, this doesn't necessarily label Type 7 as impulse-only; our heroes would have to start their search from somewhere, and they have absolutely no clue on the direction or destination of the shuttle, so they have to search full volumes of space. At first, they would have searched the volume a vehicle without impulse drive could have covered; then the volume a vehicle without warp drive could have covered; then the volume a vehicle with speed below warp 2 could have covered; and still their target could be a shuttle capable of warp 2.2.

Nowhere else does the plot demand that a shuttle be warp-incapable. Then again, the plot of DS9 "The Sound of Her Voice" demands that a shuttle not have a warp core aboard. Might mean that shuttles go to warp by some other means, or that shuttles have easily removable warp cores, or that shuttles can perform planetary landings with the warp core shut down cold - while the mothership does not, doesn't have, and/or cannot.

Timo Saloniemi
 
While there is some specific episodes with warp and one specific for impulse only, the TNG shuttles were NEVER seen at warp. This exaggerates the perception of impulse only.

The reason for this is likely because of the extra FX it would require such as scanning the model for the warp entry scene and a warp tunnel scene.
 
While there is some specific episodes with warp and one specific for impulse only, the TNG shuttles were NEVER seen at warp. This exaggerates the perception of impulse only.

The reason for this is likely because of the extra FX it would require such as scanning the model for the warp entry scene and a warp tunnel scene.
What kind of vessel were picard and company in during the episode with the destabilized romulan singularity? The one with the time dilation effects caused by entities attempting to nest in the singularity?

It seemed bigger then a standard shuttle, runabout perhaps? Although I had thought those were a DS9 thing, and don't recall the TNG episode clearly enough.
 
While there is some specific episodes with warp and one specific for impulse only, the TNG shuttles were NEVER seen at warp. This exaggerates the perception of impulse only.

The reason for this is likely because of the extra FX it would require such as scanning the model for the warp entry scene and a warp tunnel scene.
What kind of vessel were picard and company in during the episode with the destabilized romulan singularity? The one with the time dilation effects caused by entities attempting to nest in the singularity?

It seemed bigger then a standard shuttle, runabout perhaps? Although I had thought those were a DS9 thing, and don't recall the TNG episode clearly enough.

Standard runabout. Just like in DS9.
 
While there is some specific episodes with warp and one specific for impulse only, the TNG shuttles were NEVER seen at warp. This exaggerates the perception of impulse only.

The reason for this is likely because of the extra FX it would require such as scanning the model for the warp entry scene and a warp tunnel scene.
What kind of vessel were picard and company in during the episode with the destabilized romulan singularity? The one with the time dilation effects caused by entities attempting to nest in the singularity?

It seemed bigger then a standard shuttle, runabout perhaps? Although I had thought those were a DS9 thing, and don't recall the TNG episode clearly enough.

While there is some specific episodes with warp and one specific for impulse only, the TNG shuttles were NEVER seen at warp. This exaggerates the perception of impulse only.

The reason for this is likely because of the extra FX it would require such as scanning the model for the warp entry scene and a warp tunnel scene.
What kind of vessel were picard and company in during the episode with the destabilized romulan singularity? The one with the time dilation effects caused by entities attempting to nest in the singularity?

It seemed bigger then a standard shuttle, runabout perhaps? Although I had thought those were a DS9 thing, and don't recall the TNG episode clearly enough.

Standard runabout. Just like in DS9.

Yeah it was a standard runnabout.
DS9 and TNG actually over lapped at this point and so it was though instead of creating the Captain's Yacht just for that episode.

I'm not sure if we ever see a runnabout jump to warp. I wouldn't doubt that it's happen but Voyager is the first time I recall seeing shuttles at warp and jumpting to warp. If it's true then it's because the the larger use of CGI made it easier and practical.
 
It's a fuzzy question.
I previously thought that it was clear they were implying antimatter reactor but others have brought relevant questions to the fore. Yet, I question the need for a manifold on a fussion reactor.
 
If a fusion reactor was producing your charged plasma, you would need a manifold to divide and direct the plasma to multiple engines (if you have more than one) and a manifold inside your engines to feed plasma to each warp coil.
 
I thought a manifold was an outlet not just a forked pipe.
(Truth be told I have no idea why a antimatter reactor would need a manifold either)
 
If you're trying to bust Einsteins chops, you need tremendous power quickly. A fusion reactor might produce power, but not fast enough. Antimatter is power stored in the most compact way we know of, on tap as quickly as you need it. And a fusion bomb isn't practical for anything like this.

And, as I mentioned before, a method was discovered last year for producing one type of anitmatter with relative ease. We just haven't developed storage bottles for it yet. And there's probably no hurry to do so, since their main use would be for space travel, not much of a market at this point.
 
If you're trying to bust Einsteins chops, you need tremendous power quickly. A fusion reactor might produce power, but not fast enough. Antimatter is power stored in the most compact way we know of, on tap as quickly as you need it. And a fusion bomb isn't practical for anything like this.

And, as I mentioned before, a method was discovered last year for producing one type of anitmatter with relative ease. We just haven't developed storage bottles for it yet. And there's probably no hurry to do so, since their main use would be for space travel, not much of a market at this point.

I always suspected fusion was not a single viable method of FTL. Maybe multiple plants.
 
I thought a manifold was an outlet not just a forked pipe.
(Truth be told I have no idea why a antimatter reactor would need a manifold either)

"Manifold: A chamber having several outlets."

A forked pipe basically.
 
Indeed...but why would an M/AR need a multiple outlet as though it needs to breathe? Manifold has only been used in reference to the impulse engines.

In the briar patch it didn't make much sense that the impulse engines need to breathe too...and apparently they do....why would the gases in the Briar Patch do anything to the impulse engines.
 
No criticisms here... keep up the good work. I couldn't do better, and I'll guarantee neither can the rest of 'em. Some people have a nack for pointing out faults. That energy needs to be redirected in a more constructive fashion. To nit-pick is just illogical.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top