Where did Kurtzman say that? I thought it was a rationale I came up with (but I still think doesn't work)Kurtzman himself has said the ship is supposed to be hollow with the habitable areas located along the perimeter. Supposedly, the intent was to explain how the ship could be twice the size of a Constitution class but only have a fraction of the crew, or so says Kurtzman.
Then they went ahead and showed the Enterprise also had a similar turbolift contraption in the Q&A Short Trek thereby negating that supposed retcon.
I thought you said Kurtzman said it? Or maybe I'm conflating things with the reports that the whole thing was thought up by the "episode's director" without consulting anyone else. Given this contraption first showed up in an episode directed by Kurtzman, that would fit. And it also fits with how Kurtzman basically treated season 2 as his "Fix Canon" agenda with everything in that season meant to rectify the mistakes committed in the first season.Where did Kurtzman say that? I thought it was a rationale I came up with (but I still think doesn't work)
Kurtzman directed S02E01 where it first appeared, so it's got to have gone through him. That's probably what I said, with my own idea of Hollow Discovery to try and justify it.I thought you said Kurtzman said it? Or maybe I'm conflating things with the reports that the whole thing was thought up by the "episode's director" without consulting anyone else. Given this contraption first showed up in an episode directed by Kurtzman, that would fit. And it also fits with how Kurtzman basically treated season 2 as his "Fix Canon" agenda with everything in that season meant to rectify the mistakes committed in the first season.
None of it makes any logical sense. It’s purely a visual oddity that one should just ignore and not take remotely seriously.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.