• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News Trans character announced

Status
Not open for further replies.
Amorality is the same as bigotry. There is no compromise between "trans people deserve to live" and "trans people deserve to be tortured and then killed."
 
I hope Grey isn't the new Dax. It's just too lazy.
I just don’t have any desire to see Dax again. The character’s persona was whichever actor’s character had the Trill, thus it had no real definable personality. Now, I would love to see Jadzia or even Ezra again,.
 
I just don’t have any desire to see Dax again. The character’s persona was whichever actor’s character had the Trill, thus it had no real definable personality. Now, I would love to see Jadzia or even Ezra again,.
Well yeah, because the symbiont had no inherent personality of its own. It just took on the personalities and memories of its hosts. The whole situation with joran showed that the host could influence the symbiont as much as the symbiont influenced the host.
 
I do wonder if studio economics would make such a project viable?

If more people who are LGBT get into the industry and also become executives at movie studios and production companies, yeah, I can see that happening.
 
There has to be a paying audience.

What point are you trying to make with this post?

Probably not the point, but lizards and amphibians can spontainiously switch genders.

Have you read mote in the eye of God, or heard about the recent seasons of Doctor Who?

If your gender flip flops half a dozen times over the course of a life time, one might develop a preference.
 
Last edited:
Who gives a shit about lizards? The point is the real life trans and non-binary people whose lives will be improved by increased normalization of trans and non-binary people in media.

Which is similar to how I felt when I read that the trans character was going to be a Trill.

Half slug and half totally okay with gender/orientation as a society, ovcercoming no adversity.
 
I've just read everything that Shatner posted in those tweets and found nothing transphobic. He hardly even mentioned "trans". All he did is point out that he didn't like to be labeled and that whenever people call him "cis" it's used as an attack. It's sad that many people are being falsely labeled "transphobic" just because they don't like the use of labels and think everyone should be treated equally. And not everyone who disagrees with what is currently politically correct is a "racist", "misogynist", "homophobe" or "transphobe".

In a 13-page thread that talks about trans representation, I'm surprised that no one has mentioned Morgan Kelly, a character first mentioned in the TNG episode Power Play who was revealed to be a transgender woman in the Enterprise novel Live by the Code. As far as I know, she is the first human trans character in Star Trek.
 
Last edited:
I've just read everything that Shatner posted in those tweets and found nothing transphobic. He hardly even mentioned "trans". All he did is point out that he didn't like to be labeled and that whenever people call him "cis" it's used as an attack. It's sad that many people are being falsely labeled "transphobic" just because they don't like the use of labels and think everyone should be treated equally. And not everyone who disagrees with what is currently politically correct is a "racist", "misogynist", "homophobe" or "transphobe".

In a 13-page thread that talks about trans representation, I'm surprised that no one has mentioned Morgan Kelly, a character first mentioned in the TNG episode Power Play who was revealed to be a transgender woman in the Enterprise novel Live by the Code. As far as I know, she is the first human trans character in Star Trek.

The wording of his tweets are specifically constructed to ignore the gender of the trans people he argues with while also disregarding the academically and medically accepted term of 'cis' for referring to people to people who are not trans. He doesn't want to be labeled 'cis' because he doesn't like being labeled anything but 'normal'. It's the same reaction any ever has to being called 'cis'.

Shatner apparently doesn't know how to Google or he's just being an obtuse asshole for the sake of it.

Anyway, Morgan Kelly is a character only mentioned in dialogue, never played on-screen by a trans woman and then revived purely for a line in some novel somewhere. Like...yeah, people aren't going to remember or give a shit because trans people aren't so easily placated.
 
Which is similar to how I felt when I read that the trans character was going to be a Trill.

Half slug and half totally okay with gender/orientation as a society, ovcercoming no adversity.
I mean, the article doesn’t say the Character is a trill, just that ‘they lived their life as a trill’

they could be human raised in trill society.
 
Novels don’t count. They’re not live action or canon.
Novels count because they are officially licensed Star Trek stories. Canon is a dumb concept used by those Star Trek fans who want a small Star Trek universe instead of a big one.
 
I've just read everything that Shatner posted in those tweets and found nothing transphobic. He hardly even mentioned "trans". All he did is point out that he didn't like to be labeled...

Nobody likes to be labeled by others. That's a commonplace.

We go through life with other people attaching tags to us in order to sort us into their boxes. Something that's true is that almost never is the sorting done on our behalf in what we'd recognize to be our best interests.

Thing about being a white guy is that you probably pick up fewer tags from fewer people than most other folks. In media, in commerce, in all kinds of cultural contexts, "white male" is still often an implicit synonym for "human being." So yeah, it feels weird when a new one comes along and people want you to wear it. Cis is an old word that most people think is a new tag.

One aspect of "privilege" - which in many ways is a problematic term for what it's describing - is not having to really care much about the tags people hang on you. In short, the Shat's getting worked up about nothing.
 
'Canon' doesn't matter, overall franchise visibility does, hence why the casting of del Barrio and Alexander are important. A throwaway line in a novel four and a quarter people have read is not resounding or noteworthy representation.
 
Novels count because they are officially licensed Star Trek stories.

You can believe that as long as you're not going to be bothered when the owners and creators of the IP throw those "officially licensed stories" away in presenting new ones.

'Canon' doesn't matter, overall franchise visibility does...

Yeah, it kind of matters that, in percentage terms, almost no one who's ever heard of Star Trek has ever read a Trek novel or comic. There's popular media and then there's MASS MEDIA. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top