Are you for real?Who the rat's blue bloody ass cares about the 'visual' thing?
(I don't find Bakula ugly though, it's just that I always sensed some kind of a father-figure vibe from him)
Are you for real?Who the rat's blue bloody ass cares about the 'visual' thing?
As usual, I didn't make myself clear. The point I was trying to make is that T'Pol was the equivalent of a thirty year old. Archer was in his mid to late forties. Just from a visual perspective it would have looked like one of those "old guys going after a young chick" kind of things. Visually, Tucker was a better match IMO.What?!
T'Pol is much older than Archer, she is the oldest person on the ship.
Who the rat's blue bloody ass cares about the 'visual' thing?
Is that really supposed to be a concern?
As usual, I didn't make myself clear. The point I was trying to make is that T'Pol was the equivalent of a thirty year old. Archer was in his mid to late forties. Just from a visual perspective it would have looked like one of those "old guys going after a young chick" kind of things. Visually, Tucker was a better match IMO.What?!
T'Pol is much older than Archer, she is the oldest person on the ship.
I don't think it looked even remotely like "old guys going after a young chick". 40's isn't "old guy" and "thirty year old" isn't "young chick".
There was chemistry between Archer & T'pol, but IMO it wasn't sexual. They had strong potential for friendship, but they never quite achieved that 'Picard/Riker' level of trust and understanding [example: Riker manipulated Picard into getting that 'Jamaharon' doll when he went to Riisa ('get your best friend laid' - one of the greatest tokens of friendship ever in Trek), whilst T'pol gave Archer 'The teachings of Surak' for relaxation (a lousy attempt of Vulcan humor at best)].That and a complete lack of chemistry and complete lack of "show not tell" storytelling.
Good examples, bluedana. A few more: Archer's stubborn battle to keep T'Pol with Enterprise in "Shadows of P'Jem"--even trying to convince T'Pol to fight her recall--seemed to me to be about more than keeping his science officer on board. T'Pol being able to talk Archer back from his frozen paranoia in "Singularity" was, I think, because of his trust in her. And I liked the interplay and subtext of the scene between them at the end of "Shockwave II", when he tells her, "You put it over the top"...and then as he leaves, she tells him she still doesn't believe in time travel, and without missing a beat he says good-naturedly, "The hell you don't." Nice.ENT demonstrated the trust, respect, and friendship between Archer and T'Pol on a number of occasions. There are some that spring immediately to mind, without even thinking too hard about it. Like, Fallen Hero, when Enterprise is returning the Ambassador to Mazar. T'Pol asks Archer not to do so, saying, In all the time I've been on this ship, I've never asked you for anything. I'm asking now. Don't return the Ambassador to Mazar. And Archer changes course without another word. She doesn't tell him what she's learned, and it goes against his instincts (having almost had his ship blown apart), but he does it anyway. The Seventh: T'Pol asks Archer to come along and give her support in her mission. Stigma: Archer does everything he can to convince the Vulcans to let T'Pol stay on Enterprise yet does not reveal her secret - because she asked him not to. Impulse: Archer will not leave T'Pol behind (despite her trying to rip his face off), and even though she's almost completely lost control, she tries her best to continue to function - because he asks her to. Shockwave: Archer leaves the ship in her command as he leaves for his likely death, which is a 180 degree turn from Broken Bow, where he just assumed she would undermine the mission and return to Earth. I also think that handing-over-of-command scene in Observer Effect shows the trust and friendship between them. There are more, I'm sure, but those are the ones I can think of that go beyond Captain - First Officer.
Very good analysis. I think that the way Connor developed the Trip character, you would expect he would take the more "personal approach" in his interactions with people, including T'Pol. One other factor with his interactions with T'Pol is that one could assume is that during the many, many "neuro-pressure" sessions that we did not see on screen, a more "personal" relationship developed during conversations between the two that would lead to the on-screen way they interacted. No one else in the series had that benefit.Trip was always very feeling oriented and personal in his exchanges with T'Pol. I think a lot of the other crew just wouldn't go there because she was a Vulcan. I know I wouldn't start talking about my feelings around a Vulcan or asking after their feelings (!) But Trip just carried on naturally with T'Pol and I believe (because of her curiosity and weaknesses) that she was seduced by this. I think it was a very believable dynamic.
That occurred to me as well. That TPTB wanted to establish that some boundaries should not / would not be crossed.I don't think a triangle or sexual tensions between the two was really on the cards and the night in sickbay was just to get that idea out of the way. I didn't like how their 'friendship' developed either.
IMO, had T'pol been a true, full fledged TOS/TNG-ish Vulcan, she would never have hesitated in acting on her attraction to Trip - she wouldn't have needed competition (plot device) that was Amanda Cole. It would not have been *logical.*the only thing that went wrong was Vulcan society and T'Pol's and the rest of Vulcan's confusion as to what being vulcan actually was. take that out of the equation they'd a been married with 4 kids by the end of season 6.
Trip T'Pol
It's my opinion that SB was an awful actor.....
I also think he was badly written.
Excellent point! During the TOS/TNG time frame, it was established that a inter-spices relationship between a Vulcan and a Human was not only acceptable but in fact could be logical. I too, liked the way Vulcan's were protraied in Enterprise, they were far more interesting characters. I also liked Coto's explaination for the their change.IMO, had T'pol been a true, full fledged TOS/TNG-ish Vulcan, she would never have hesitated in acting on her attraction to Trip - she wouldn't have needed competition (plot device) that was Amanda Cole. It would not have been *logical.*
Excellent point! During the TOS/TNG time frame, it was established that a inter-spices relationship between a Vulcan and a Human was not only acceptable but in fact could be logical. I too, liked the way Vulcan's were protraied in Enterprise, they were far more interesting characters. I also liked Coto's explaination for the their change.IMO, had T'pol been a true, full fledged TOS/TNG-ish Vulcan, she would never have hesitated in acting on her attraction to Trip - she wouldn't have needed competition (plot device) that was Amanda Cole. It would not have been *logical.*
Trip T'Pol
It's my opinion that SB was an awful actor.....
I also think he was badly written.
I think statement 2 is more valid than statement 1. SB was very good in Quantum Leap. I think that he was directed poorly and Archer wasn't written very well.
Indeed...People don't always see the same things in a story.
I know what I saw too, and what I didn't see, which was no building of any of that friendship, trust and respect that was supposed to exist between those charactersI'm not going to agree with you that there was no friendship, trust, or respect between Archer and T'Pol because I know what I saw.
I'm going to guess that goes back to the first thing, too.And I know what I can relate to.
You listed examples of where we were told they were supposed to have those things between them, but even in those examples they don't really ring true because of the complete lack of chemistry between the actors. But no matter how you cut it, there we were never shown anything developing between them, one of them would just say that they trusted/respected/considered the other one a friend.I gave you examples of where I saw believable friendship between the two - not just mission related, and that reminds me that I left out First Flight, where T'Pol is very much a friend to Archer in his grief - and so did Hopeful Romantic, so it's just not true to categorically say it isn't there.
And what part of anything I or anyone said ever suggested that? I can't speak for others, but I said I couldn't see any chemistry between Archer and T'Pol, romantic or otherwise, and that I saw no real development along those lines. That's not saying that I even thought there shouldn't have been at least trust and respect between them, or even friendship, but the writing just didn't convince me.I also see lovely chemistry and friendship at times between Trip and T'Pol, and I do not think the two friendships are mutually exclusive. People can have more than one close friend, unless they are in the sixth grade.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.