D
David's Planet
Guest
From the Roddenberry Archives:
Definitely. If this is too abrasive how do I delete it?It is possible to say you like something without shitting on somebody else you know?
Dude. It's Star Trek. We're all late to the party. Meaning, we're here discussing a show that came out in 1966. Saying anyone is 'a bit late to the party' is kind of silly no? I mean, you'd have to delete 98% of the threads on here with that philosophy.Bit late to the party on this one aren't you? It's been out for almost a year.
Bit late to the party on this one aren't you? It's been out for almost a year.
Comparing one Trek to another is done here every day.It is possible to say you like something without shitting on somebody else you know?
Comparing one Trek to another is done here every day.
I don't think it's a competition. There is good and there is not good.It's not a competition.
I don't think it's a competition. There is good and there is not good.
TOS good.I don't think it's a competition. There is good and there is not good.
So you just go around stoking fires with new people?TOS good.
TNG not good.
DISCOVERY good.
Picard mixed.
ENT not good.
SNW good.
Not at all. I'm demonstrating that "good" Trek is subjective.So you just go around stoking fires with new people?
From the Roddenberry Archives:
He merely said that it was his personal opinion that one thing was better than the others. I completely agree with you in general on this, but there's also being way too sensitive in the other direction. If someone says they don't like something you do like, it's not necessarily a personal attack.Agreed.
But there is a way to do it without getting people’s hackles up.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.