DS9 I see as something of an outlier. It's a great show. It's just a great show that... doesn't quite scratch the itch the way that TNG and VOY do. I jockey DS9 and ENT for the #3 spot... I usually lean towards ENT being #3. Although in reality, I get more nitty gritty and rank by seasons. Seasons REALLY matter in Star Trek. PIC S3 and ENT S4 are #1 and #2 respectively. TNG 3-7 rank #3. VOY and DS9 get a bit in the weeds, with ENT 1 and 2 sprinkled in there somewhere. Dead last is easy, DSC S1 and 2. (the list evolves, sometimes DSC 3-4 get moved up above DS9 S1 and TNG S1, although realistically I would probably watch those over DSC so... idk.)
Both DS9 and ENT took awhile to get going. But whereas DS9 got itself together out of the gate come S3 and remained really good for the rest of its run, ENT still took half of S3 to get really good. A couple of episodes notwithstanding. Even fans of ENT admit that the second episode of the season should have been the season three premiere.
That's putting it lightly. I know you were in the trenches with me back in the day and I don't need to tell you how relentless Archer bashers were to the point some people wanted to kill him off and make Trip the captain.
He's gotten a bit of redemption by much of fandom in the last few years, though.
Archer did not need to be killed off, though that could have made S4 very different and made S3 very consequential. But he could have become lost in time and become Future Guy. Or at least lose the pre-ordained future.
Oh my goodness! That’s awful! What a horrible thing to say! Also, I love, love, love Trip but nah, not at all interested in seeing him be captain.
Like it or not, Archer, T’Pol and Trip were the main characters — the Kirk, Spock and Bones of their show. Who says something like “They should have killed Kirk off”? And then what? Had only two main characters? Suddenly shine the light on someone in the background? At least on TOS, if you brought Uhura into the spotlight, you’d have some idea who you were getting. Hoshi and Travis were sadly and sorely underutilized — I 100% agree with that — but it was so grievously obvious they were practically nonentities and suddenly spotlighting them would make that oversight even more blatant. What did these viewers even have in mind?
Seven came aboard Voyager in S4 and become central to the show for the remained of its run. Hoshi and Travis both being spotlighted
I think choosing either of them to be spotlighted for seasons 5, 6, and 7, or even bringing a new character that’s a hybrid of them (and Reed as well, tbh) could have worked in theory.
But with Shran in the works of being brought aboard for S5, to put the spotlight three of the four founding species of the Federation, Hoshi and Travis would have still been overlooked. Unless the show started to take a TNG/DS9 approach, or there was a spinoff based on Columbia and the characters transferred over to that show.
Which is what I think the issue really was. ENT could have still been like TOS in embracing the TOS lore and the moral ambiguity of TOS, while retaining the habits of TNG and DS9 of spotlighting multiple characters at once.
Trip's attitude toward the Vulcans (and arguably broader xenophobia) would have been enough to keep me from wanting to see him as captain for an extended period of time (for those who watched it, think of Saul Tigh's tenure as commander of Galactica).
Would Trip temporarily being a captain been a bad thing?
Imagine a multi episode arrc where Trip does get promoted, he does learn from his mistakes and preconceptions, and he still gets demoted even when he is clearly in the right for once. It would have worked well in showing that Starfleet or the Vulcans not getting it right all of the time.
...I guess in the end I just really don't quite understand why people particularly liked Trip as a character, which I'll freely grant may be a Me Problem.
His S3 arc changed everything. That was when Trip became a more likeable character, imo. Before then, he was basically a ‘00s version of Stamets from the first couple of seasons of DIS.
Last edited: