Reading through the threads in this forum I'm picking up on a fair bit of negativity towards the TNG-R books, in particular Resistance and Before Dishonor. My question is WHY????? I thought that were excellent!!! Sure, they weren't perfect but to be honest I've never read a book that was.
not that they don't matter, but to use some statistical terms, the sample size is too small and not random, therefore, they are not representative of the overall population.as KRAD already put it so succinctly none of our opinions here on the internet really matter
Also...and not only is this a minor nit, but I am trying as best I can to say it without sounding like an intolerant Bible-thumper...I admit I did have issues with the concept of "them" from Q&A. But I can learn to get over that, I suppose.
Indeed, the very fact that They are Them rather than He (or It) would point away from a Judeo-Christian conception of divinity
I just hope and pray that Christopher won't let me down with Greater Than the Sum. Which I know he won't, but I do wonder if he's taking any of the criticisms leveled at the relaunch so far seriously.
The really, big beef about the Relaunch I have, aside from two of the books being stinkers: the Enterprise feels empty. It feels like the only characters we actually know and care about are the old ones, and there's only four of those. Please guys, put some better supporting characters in, that's all I ask.
Exactly. Not only that, but "they" definitely don't act like I believe God acts.
But, as I said, I can overlook this. Even though the use and concept of "them" is incompatible with my beliefs, I can still enjoy the book as a whole. (This is also the attitude I have towards Trek in general, "Bread and Circuses" notwithstanding.)
Why the ALLCAPS? Anyway...
(1) Repetitive. I'm not just talking about the obsession with the Borg here, although that's a big part of it. I'm also taking about how much of the content itself just seemed to riff on elements of the series, movies, or in BD's case, David's previous work. Obviously I would expect the themes and character points of the series to continue, but I was also hoping for some new direction, new plot seeds, and so far it's been a lot of 'same old, same old'.
There was always room for the Borg to come back imho. I'm just one of those people who can't get enough of them. Cast your mind back to the novels of the 80's and early 90's when 95% of the novels involved going down to some boring planet where 1 or 2 of the landing party would be imprisoned for something. Now that's repetitive!! I can understand wanting new plots etc but there's years ahead for that!
(2) False Epic. In terms of set-up and plot, the TNG Relaunch obviously wants to be epic. Grand action across the quadrant, life-and-death struggles for civilization, etc. Except that thus far, most books have failed to deliver on that promise. DiW was pedestrian, Resistance uninspired, and Before Dishonor impossible to take seriously. They're plenty ambitious in scope in theory, but fail to deliver on the page with downright insipid storylines.
I thought the relaunch WAS epic, from planet eating cubes to huge space battles to god like beings.
(3) Directionless. Related to (1), but I feel worth mentioning on its own. From the false start that was Death in Winter, the Relaunch is just spinning its wheels, stuck in a quagmire. This might seem odd with Destiny around the corner, but I have no sense of momentum, no sense that events are leading us somewhere other than yet another tussle with the Borg. I can't help but compare this, perhaps unfairly, with the DS9R, where I always had a powerful sense of the overall story steadily moving forward, which contributes to my wanting to get to the next story, to see what aspect of the tapestry it will reveal. With the TNG Relaunch, I couldn't even know from reading these books that there is an overall story.
Maybe there's no big direction on par with DS9-R but surely that's to come with Destiny...
(4) Characterization. Another plus in the DS9R was the strength of the new characters and the broad, evolving supporting cast. This was particularly important for this series considering how few main cast members from the series are actually left (Picard, Crusher, Worf and Geordi). The standing characters have, I must admit, received largely good treatment, particularly the budding Picard and Crusher relationship, though I still think Geordi's sorely lacking for character development. But no one new has been added to the roster worth mentioning. Probably the most interesting character so far was Jon Stephens, and that's not saying much since he very obvious came off the Peter David Character Assembly Line (tm). The new senior staff officers are bland and unlikeable (and here I'm forced to include Q&A in the criticism); I couldn't care less if they lived or died, and after Before Dishonor would probably prefer the latter. And, of course, the disparity between Q&A and Before Dishonor is to me, though I understand others are inclined to be more lenient, a major screwup. Finally, where this was an ideal opportunity to flesh out the crew of the ENT-E, so far it feels like a ghost ship. Maybe it's hard to talk about life aboard ship while rushing from one crisis to another, but the TNG Relaunch is, IMHO, shooting itself in the foot by not taking the opportunity afforded by the novel format to create a large and diverse cast for the series.
Surely Vanguard and Titan are the series to visit if you want new characters.
I think the characters we have are strong enough (inc the new ones intr in Q&A) not to need new characters. (besides I'm still holding out for the return of Data!!
[quote]someone said something[/quote]
someone said something
I'm only part way through Death in Winter, which my wife bought me for my birthday, but I'm enjoying it greatly.
That said, going by the reviews to date, I can't say I'm terribly interested in picking up the others.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.