• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TNG RELAUNCH? WHY THE NEGATIVITY?

Question is....Do you ANXIOUSLY await the next adventure of the present crew?
Answering truthfully...I gotta say ..not really.And that's no reflection on whomever is the next author "up".As somebody else said earlier,I don't care if the new guys live or die ,in fact include Mr.Worf in that too.
Seeing as most posters above approve the DS9-R & Vanguard,would anyone agree that perhaps the TNG-R was a case of "too many cooks..."?
 
I think a situation where several new characters came in to replace beloved characters, with no planned plot arc (lest the publishers tell the authors what to do) and, more importantly, little continuity between novels (not the fault of the authors given that at least in some cases they had no idea where the others were taking the characters), would always result in problems.

Not only do I not anticipate the new adventures of crews which have run their race, I don't anticipate new Trek books. I haven't pre-ordered one for ages, and most I borrow from a library without ever buying a copy, simply because none impress me all that much. It's not just the relaunch that's the problem either - I've been very disappointed with a lot of Trek books over the past few years - to the point where I'm not disappointed, but just don't even bother getting them any more.
 
Seeing as most posters above approve the DS9-R & Vanguard,would anyone agree that perhaps the TNG-R was a case of "too many cooks..."?
Uh, the post-finale DS9 fiction has also had a lot of "cooks." Each story had a different writer, just as has been the case with TNG. Heck, fewer, considering that the Mission: Gamma tetralogy had four different authors where the Destiny trilogy has just the one.
 
^^ Thank you Christopher!! I couldn't agree more. Once they made the decision to use the Borg again it was 100% correct to evolve them.

I disagree on two fronts. One, that there was a necessity to change the Borg. Voyager let us glean a number of insights into Borg culture without the need to radically change who the Borg are. And I'm sure that a civilization as old and complex as the Borg, no matter how homogeneous, must still have had plenty of unexplored space in which stories could have functioned. I can think of a few off the top of my head, though I think it would qualify as 'story idea' and thus no-go. Two, I disagree that the Borg have been 'evolved'. If anything, what's happened to them has been a devolution. The Borg used to be unique, in that their motivations and modus operandi transcended that of the typical villain. And now? The Borg attack on sight, hate the Federation and otherwise behave like Snidely Whiplash wannabes. In other words, like every other run-of-the-mill baddie out there. What was unique about the Borg has been tossed out the window in favour of pointless 'ooh, scary' hype. What's the point? We know who'll win. It's about creating an interesting villain to contrast with, not a contest to see who can be the most ravening cliché psycho.

Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman
 
I disagree on two fronts. One, that there was a necessity to change the Borg. Voyager let us glean a number of insights into Borg culture without the need to radically change who the Borg are.

But only because the Borg had already been radically changed from their original conception. By the time VGR came along, the initial concept of a vat-grown hive race only interested in technology had been heavily retconned: the Collective's goal was to assimilate people, its drones were captive humanoids with buried identities rather than blank slates, and it was governed by a Queen who served as a face and voice for the whole Collective, even more so than Locutus did. All those changes were made to the original concept in order to make the Borg more personalized, both in themselves and in their objectives. That is what made it possible to tell all those stories about them. The Borg of "Q Who" had none of that. The original concept was just too limited.

The Borg used to be unique, in that their motivations and modus operandi transcended that of the typical villain. And now? The Borg attack on sight, hate the Federation and otherwise behave like Snidely Whiplash wannabes. In other words, like every other run-of-the-mill baddie out there. What was unique about the Borg has been tossed out the window in favour of pointless 'ooh, scary' hype.

If what was "unique" was that the Borg ignored the presence of intruders until they proved themselves a threat, then I'd say that, given all the times Starfleet has exploited that loophole to defeat them, it's long past time the Borg adapted and got a little proactive. I don't see any change in their motivations. Their motivations are to survive, adapt, and assimilate. They've finally, belatedly adapted by eliminating a very stupid behavior that was never anything more than a lame plot gimmick to make it easy for Our Heroes to survive against them. I mean, sure, the Borg don't care about individual humanoids; but you and I don't care about individual flu viruses, but we certainly hope that our immune system notices their presence and attacks them rather than letting them have the run of our bodies until they become an overt threat.

And given that Starfleet has successfully fought off two Borg invasions, killed three Queens, liberated tens of thousands of drones, fomented a resistance movement within the Collective, crippled the Borg's galactic transwarp network, and destroyed their central Unicomplex, it would be unbelievable if they didn't respond by ramping up their hostility toward the Federation. Probably nobody other than Species 8472 has ever done them that much damage in that short a period. Do you really think they should just shrug it off and go on with business as usual? Are the Borg so "unique" that they won't even defend themselves against a threat of that magnitude?
 
I'm only part way through Death in Winter, which my wife bought me for my birthday, but I'm enjoying it greatly.

That said, going by the reviews to date, I can't say I'm terribly interested in picking up the others.

Please don't let the negative reviews put you off!! I loved Death In Winter and if you're enjoying that you will love the rest trust me!!
Alas, the last Peter David novel I liked was Rock and a Hard Place, so it's pretty unlikely I'll be picking up his relaunch novel.
 
Still, it could be worse - we could have had Wesley as a character in the relaunch. Reading his scenes in the second A Time To book was painful.
 
But only because the Borg had already been radically changed from their original conception. (...) The Borg of "Q Who" had none of that. The original concept was just too limited.

Well, yes. Although I maintain the Queen was never necessary; I just caught the tail end of "Scorpion, Pt. 1" tonight, and thought the Borg did just fine as a collective. Of course, I like to see "Q Who" as something of a pilot for the Borg, the beta-version Borg; just as elements of a show shift from the pilot, so did the Borg get tweaked into a form that would sustain both a credible civilization and frequent villain. But, like I said, there was still plenty of room to explore the Borg as they were: alien.

If what was "unique" was that the Borg ignored the presence of intruders until they proved themselves a threat, then I'd say that, given all the times Starfleet has exploited that loophole to defeat them, it's long past time the Borg adapted and got a little proactive. I don't see any change in their motivations. Their motivations are to survive, adapt, and assimilate. They've finally, belatedly adapted by eliminating a very stupid behavior that was never anything more than a lame plot gimmick to make it easy for Our Heroes to survive against them. I mean, sure, the Borg don't care about individual humanoids; but you and I don't care about individual flu viruses, but we certainly hope that our immune system notices their presence and attacks them rather than letting them have the run of our bodies until they become an overt threat.

It was just an example, but let's consider this, shall we? If the Borg had really changed their mind about the threat individual humanoids walking about their ships could pose, then why not, oh, I don't know, raise shields to prevent beam-ins in the first place? This Borg pecadilo was always attributed to the Borg confidence in themselves and perceived irrelevance of others, and the idea that the cube was so decentralized that any damaged portion will be circumvented and soon repaired, not to any kind of tactical sense. If they ever did develop a tactical sense, they should realize what a bad idea it is to have no shields in the first place, so that people could--never mind the minor inconvinience of boarding parties--beam over a variety of tactical warheads, primed and ready to blow. You want lame plot gimmicks? Borg deciding that the best way to deal with intruders is to let them beam over, walk around a while, and then send drones with close-range hand weapons to lurch out of the shadows like a carnival haunted house is a lame plot gimmick to try and recapture the dread the Borg originally inspired. Why not give drones weapons that can be used at a distance? Why not flood the ship with a plague or atmospheric conditions lethal to most organics but which the nanoprobe-enhanced drones can ignore? Or, once again, not permit beam-ins in the first place? The previous dysfunctional behaviour was a cultural blind spot. The current one is just plain dumb.

And given that Starfleet has successfully fought off two Borg invasions, killed three Queens, liberated tens of thousands of drones, fomented a resistance movement within the Collective, crippled the Borg's galactic transwarp network, and destroyed their central Unicomplex, it would be unbelievable if they didn't respond by ramping up their hostility toward the Federation. Probably nobody other than Species 8472 has ever done them that much damage in that short a period. Do you really think they should just shrug it off and go on with business as usual? Are the Borg so "unique" that they won't even defend themselves against a threat of that magnitude?

At the risk of seeming persnickety, I don't think the Federation ever posed a threat of any magnitude--not until "Engdame", anyway. Fought off two invasions? Big freaking deal--the 'invasions' were one cube each, and the Federation only won by the narrowest of margins. Someone barely managing to defeat what doesn't even amount to a skirmish given Borg resources isn't a threat. Destroyed a few Queens? Who cares, just assemble another one. Plenty to go around. The Borg civilization stretches over ten light-years of space, and that's just their core, not counting all the feelers they have elsewhere in the galaxy. That means thousands of worlds, millions of ships, untold billions of drones. What a few destroyed/liberated/rogue drones in all of that? Not even a drop in the ocean. Presumably the Borg's standard tactics that we deride must have served them well most everywhere else since most everybody else is dead frightened of them, including civilizations that were more advanced than the Federation. Heck, the Borg could have crushed Voyager most anytime they wanted to--they just didn't care. The Queen was pretty explicit about how little consideration she gave one little starship, or the civilization from which it sprang. The Borg don't sweat the small stuff, and they don't get personal. That's part of what made them such great villains: even the best efforts, the most devastating blows we could muster, the Borg just shrugged it off as unimportant. "Endgame" was the only time the Federation actually manifested as a threat to the Borg, destroying the transwarp hub with future tech... but then, the Borg were well aware that it was done with future tech, so if they've any interest in the Federation, it would be to capture that technology, and not anything so petty as revenge.

Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman
 
At the risk of seeming persnickety, I don't think the Federation ever posed a threat of any magnitude--not until "Engdame", anyway. Fought off two invasions? Big freaking deal--the 'invasions' were one cube each, and the Federation only won by the narrowest of margins. Someone barely managing to defeat what doesn't even amount to a skirmish given Borg resources isn't a threat. Destroyed a few Queens? Who cares, just assemble another one. Plenty to go around.

I'm afraid you do seem persnickety, because my list was intended to show a cumulative pattern, not to suggest that each individual instance was of equal impact to the Borg. Yes, the Borg weren't bothered by the first few instances where Starfleet stymied them, but eventually a clear pattern began to emerge, culminating with the crippling strike on the transwarp network and the Unicomplex. The Borg haven't just taken one severe blow from the Federation -- they've been beaten by them again and again, with the damage escalating over time.

That's part of what made them such great villains: even the best efforts, the most devastating blows we could muster, the Borg just shrugged it off as unimportant. "Endgame" was the only time the Federation actually manifested as a threat to the Borg, destroying the transwarp hub with future tech... but then, the Borg were well aware that it was done with future tech, so if they've any interest in the Federation, it would be to capture that technology, and not anything so petty as revenge.

When did anyone ever say it was about revenge? It's about self-defense, with the best defense being a good offense. It's entirely rational and pragmatic that if a clear and persistent threat emerges, you intensify your efforts to neutralize it.

Don't forget that the Borg were already very badly weakened by their war with Species 8472. As of "Scorpion Part 2," they projected that they were weeks away from total defeat, IIRC. So they must've been in pretty bad shape. Which would explain why they were so much less of a threat to Voyager than you'd expect. You may be right that the original, TNG-era Borg would've been powerful enough to shrug off even the events of "Endgame" as a mere setback, but the post-"Scorpion" Borg are a different matter. They no longer have the luxury to dismiss such an attack as unimportant. Maybe you can make a case that the old Collective was more interesting in its godlike indifference, but that ship sailed 11 years ago.
 
At the risk of seeming persnickety, I don't think the Federation ever posed a threat of any magnitude--not until "Engdame", anyway. Fought off two invasions? Big freaking deal--the 'invasions' were one cube each, and the Federation only won by the narrowest of margins. Someone barely managing to defeat what doesn't even amount to a skirmish given Borg resources isn't a threat. Destroyed a few Queens? Who cares, just assemble another one. Plenty to go around. The Borg civilization stretches over ten light-years of space, and that's just their core, not counting all the feelers they have elsewhere in the galaxy. That means thousands of worlds, millions of ships, untold billions of drones. What a few destroyed/liberated/rogue drones in all of that? Not even a drop in the ocean. Presumably the Borg's standard tactics that we deride must have served them well most everywhere else since most everybody else is dead frightened of them, including civilizations that were more advanced than the Federation. Heck, the Borg could have crushed Voyager most anytime they wanted to--they just didn't care. The Queen was pretty explicit about how little consideration she gave one little starship, or the civilization from which it sprang. The Borg don't sweat the small stuff, and they don't get personal. That's part of what made them such great villains: even the best efforts, the most devastating blows we could muster, the Borg just shrugged it off as unimportant. "Endgame" was the only time the Federation actually manifested as a threat to the Borg, destroying the transwarp hub with future tech... but then, the Borg were well aware that it was done with future tech, so if they've any interest in the Federation, it would be to capture that technology, and not anything so petty as revenge.

Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman

I think the Borg would take the Federation as a bigger threat than you give them credit for. Think about it, for centuries they've been the bullies of the Delta Quadrant, and then after one chance encounter with a starship they decide to expand their power and get stopped. Not only do they end up losing their new spokesman, they almost lose their Queen, and if they hadn't of blown up the ship they could have given another race a huge step forward in defending themselves.

Then later on a whole cube goes crazy because of what the Enterprise did to one drone. And while the Borg were able to contain the damage to that one ship, I'm sure the whole Collective felt a bit of it.

Then we have First Contact where a Queen dies. To go with the bug metaphore, the destruction of a queen to a hive is devastating. Think about it, till a new Queen was made every Borg in the galaxy was crazy and functionless. Not to mention yet another cube was destroyed. And all this while the Federation is fighting a war with another civilization, and I don't think that was a coincidence.

And of course Voyager. Love it or hate it, the idea of a single ship from this same group outsmarting and defeating you at every turn has got to shout to them that the Federation is a serious threat to their security with Endgame being the nail in the coffin. A single Federation ship kills another Queen and cripples the Borg ability to travel.

To use bug terms again, the Federation is a rival anthill in the backyard that is a constant threat to the old established anthill. The Borg don't hate the Federation, they don't sit in their lair and think of ways to torture the Federation, it is simply a matter of survival and making sure they can put down the Feds before the Feds can finally stop them once and for all.

Edit: Or what Christopher has said. Damn my slow typing.
 
Alright, evolving the Borg was a good idea, in theory. But from a scientific point of view, absorbing that much raw matter (not so much people, but starships and a dwarf planet???) and then using it to essentially reproduce sounds a little too far fetched. I would rather have seen the Borg send a dozen cubes, or fifty, and take out the core worlds. The Federation could not withstand that, and I'm sorry but absorbing Pluto was not self defence, it was showing off "look what we can do now, suckas!!"

Aside from all the negativity, and I won't make another post about it, i'm bored of doing so, I am eagerly awaiting Christopher's Greater than the Sum because we'll get some real science into TNG for a change. And then being followed up by Mack's Destiny trilogy, looks like the mistakes or oversights of the early relaunch will be remade into a true epic.
 
Christopher and Rabid Trekkie, you both make excellent points regarding the Borg's "evolution." They make great sense looking at the material. I would just prefer it if such points had actually made it onto the screen or the literature. I wish other people had thought about it as much as you do, and made those points explicit rather than having to be explained by fans.

But then, perhaps Christopher does indeed make these points in GTtS. Guess we'll have to wait and see.
 
Christopher and Rabid Trekkie, you both make excellent points regarding the Borg's "evolution." They make great sense looking at the material. I would just prefer it if such points had actually made it onto the screen or the literature. I wish other people had thought about it as much as you do, and made those points explicit rather than having to be explained by fans.

But then, perhaps Christopher does indeed make these points in GTtS. Guess we'll have to wait and see.

There is some examination of these and similar issues in GTTS. Assign me to write about the Borg and it's a safe bet that I'll devote more time to figuring out what makes them tick than I will to fightin' and shootin'.
 
When did anyone ever say it was about revenge?

I'm pretty sure Before Dishonor said that. Not having the book with me at the moment, I suppose I could be remembering incorrectly, but I don't think so.

Don't forget that the Borg were already very badly weakened by their war with Species 8472. As of "Scorpion Part 2," they projected that they were weeks away from total defeat, IIRC. So they must've been in pretty bad shape.


I disagree with this logic, because 8472 was such a superior power to the Borg that their mere existence in the Delta Quadrant as a hostile force made their defeat inevitable. For example let's say a hostile alien force came to Earth today, and all they did was wipe out a small strategically insignificant US army base. We'd be literally days (possibly even hours) away from total defeat from just that one incident, but if some other alien force came and took those aliens out for us, then our army would be still just as powerful as it was before the hostiles came, and Iraq (to use an example) wouldn't suddenly be able to defeat us due to any sort of weakened state.
 
The opinions RE the Borg and their changes are very interesting. But my preference is to the original Borg in BofBW, which were far more alien and threatening by dint of their lack of character. They were humanity become machines, pure and simple, and they just kept coming.

But I can understand the need for more character, for dramatic purposes. But one of the truly cool things about those original Borg were that they adapted to attacks. I think this was the creative gold mine which was left largely unexplored in lieu of the Queen & Her Goons theme. Sure, the cycling phaser bit was done. In BofBW, Riker did something we'd never seen before to attack them. Each side was coming up with weird new stuff, and that's what excited me personallly. But it all got so predictable and formulaic. And pardon me, but I did not feel titillated at the "sexual tension" between Queen, Seven and Janeway. That wasn't supposed to be sexy, was it?

So for Borg crises, I would have preferred "this week's gimmick technology, with lots of weird robotic adaptations, and Federation counters" to the eventual "spam spam spam spam spam I'm too sexy for my legs". It would have been interesting to see just how unfeeling they as individuals had become. Removed from their technology, and unable to function or feel empathy towards living things.

So for me the "adapting" Borg of Before Dishonor felt like, well--I didn't get why there were any Borg left after Endgame's total dissolution. Or First Contact for that matter. Either they are defeated or they aren't, which is it?? The Collective is the Collective, it's not divided. If Janeway's bug destroyed one cube, it should have destroyed them all. That's what we were led to believe, wasn't it?
 
I disagree with this logic, because 8472 was such a superior power to the Borg that their mere existence in the Delta Quadrant as a hostile force made their defeat inevitable. For example let's say a hostile alien force came to Earth today, and all they did was wipe out a small strategically insignificant US army base. We'd be literally days (possibly even hours) away from total defeat from just that one incident, but if some other alien force came and took those aliens out for us, then our army would be still just as powerful as it was before the hostiles came, and Iraq (to use an example) wouldn't suddenly be able to defeat us due to any sort of weakened state.

But that analogy doesn't work, because we're not talking about a single incident. According to dialogue, the conflict began five months before "Scorpion" -- and according to later dialogue, the Borg were mere weeks away from total defeat. Even assuming the conflict started out slow and gradually escalated, it's hard not to conclude from those numbers that the Borg must have suffered substantial losses by this stage.

The analogy also fails because the US is just one country, while the Borg are spread out across a wide swath of the galaxy. Any such widespread civilization is not going to be jeopardized by a single attack; at worst, it can sacrifice its core and have outlying populations carry on independently. Even the fall of Rome didn't destroy the whole Roman Empire, just the western half; the eastern half carried on, ruled from Byzantium/Constantinople, for a millennium more. So if the Borg were that close to defeat, then they must've been invaded systematically across their whole territory, or else they must've committed all their forces everywhere to the fight; either way, they must've suffered serious losses to their entire military force -- and therefore their entire population and technological base -- galaxywide.


The opinions RE the Borg and their changes are very interesting. But my preference is to the original Borg in BofBW, which were far more alien and threatening by dint of their lack of character. They were humanity become machines, pure and simple, and they just kept coming.

Maybe. But the only way I can see to do multiple stories about such an impersonal force of nature would be not to focus on the Borg themselves, but on the peoples fighting them and the effects the conflict has on their lives. "Hope and Fear" is a good example of this kind of story, as is "Child's Play." Of course, those both had ex-drone characters playing major roles, but aside from that, they're the sort of thing I'm taking about -- stories in which the Borg threat is a McGuffin, a backdrop motivating the actions of the characters that are featured. That could've worked, but it would've meant that the Borg themselves would never really have been the focus from a dramatic standpoint, because they wouldn't have been all that interesting in themselves. You can probably generate a number of good stories about people and cultures coping with a ravaging virus, but you couldn't really tell stories about the virus itself.

But since they cast human performers as drones instead of using creature effects, that sort of guaranteed that the writers would begin looking at the Borg as characters, and all the rest came from that.

And pardon me, but I did not feel titillated at the "sexual tension" between Queen, Seven and Janeway. That wasn't supposed to be sexy, was it?

I only noticed that with the Queen and Data in FC. But then, I tend to be blind to homoerotic subtext a lot of the time.

It would have been interesting to see just how unfeeling they as individuals had become. Removed from their technology, and unable to function or feel empathy towards living things.

But once you've established that inability, where do you go next? It's great for a single story, the horror of the total loss of humanity -- see Reannon Bonaventure in Vendetta -- but you can only tell that story once. The only way you can tell more than one story about Borg drones is if they can develop personalities.

So for me the "adapting" Borg of Before Dishonor felt like, well--I didn't get why there were any Borg left after Endgame's total dissolution. Or First Contact for that matter. Either they are defeated or they aren't, which is it?? The Collective is the Collective, it's not divided. If Janeway's bug destroyed one cube, it should have destroyed them all. That's what we were led to believe, wasn't it?

I don't think that follows. How could a "neurolytic pathogen," a drug or microbe, possibly transmit itself across a subspace communications link? The pathogen destroyed the Queen and deprived the Borg of guidance, and the collapse of the transwarp hub deprived them of near-instant travel, so the attack fragmented the Collective. But it didn't destroy it. We've seen the Collective replace its Queens before.
 
Last edited:
But that analogy doesn't work, because we're not talking about a single incident. According to dialogue, the conflict began five months before "Scorpion" -- and according to later dialogue, the Borg were mere weeks away from total defeat. Even assuming the conflict started out slow and gradually escalated, it's hard not to conclude from those numbers that the Borg must have suffered substantial losses by this stage.

The analogy also fails because the US is just one country, while the Borg are spread out across a wide swath of the galaxy. Any such widespread civilization is not going to be jeopardized by a single attack; at worst, it can sacrifice its core and have outlying populations carry on independently. Even the fall of Rome didn't destroy the whole Roman Empire, just the western half; the eastern half carried on, ruled from Byzantium/Constantinople, for a millennium more. So if the Borg were that close to defeat, then they must've been invaded systematically across their whole territory, or else they must've committed all their forces everywhere to the fight; either way, they must've suffered serious losses to their entire military force -- and therefore their entire population and technological base -- galaxywide.


I don't think you're quite seeing my point here. I agree with everything you just said, (except that the analogy doesn't work). My point is that it doesn't matter that the Borg may be ridiculously huge and spread out. In their calculation of total defeat they would have taken into account the simple fact that no matter what the Borg threw at 8472 they would NOT be defeated, hell or even slowed down as we saw. So even if 8472 completely wiped out say 10000+ Borg worlds/ships why are we assuming that (since the Borg are so large and powerful) that that small number meant they were severely crippled? All I'm saying is that while it MIGHT have been the case that the Borg were actually crippled, the logic that "because they stated that they were 'mere' weeks away from total defeat" meant that they were actually severely crippled. Whether they were crippled or not is not my argument, just that the logic doesn't hold that, that statement meant that they MUST be. Consider an even more ridiculously powerful force, Q, the Borg would be mere nano-seconds away from total defeat if they faced them and could easily state as much, but that closeness doesn't mean that if suddenly that Q was stopped then the Borg would necessarily be super weakened, such that they couldn't defeat an enemy that they normally would be able to defeat.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top