No, they had cameras with timers so you could run around to get in front, back in the 60's.Selfies.![]()
Isn't it kind of lazy to play the "once bitten, twice shy" card for everything they don't do?
Seatbelts
Except for those things that clamp down on your thighs in TMP.In 2075, Captain M. Talarico and the crew of the UESS Sloane all perished when they were trapped by their safety belts and unable to reach the emergency pods before their vessel was destroyed by Kzinti pirates.
Ever since, the cornerstone of UESPA and later Starfleet policy was an absolute ban of all passenger restraining devices on warp ships.
Is that from lit or did you make that up?
6. Wi-Fi. This is a weird one, because it seems like sometimes they did, sometimes they didn't. The tricorders could tie-in to the ship's computer, but Data needed a big honking cable stuck into his head to interface. I know that was partially for the viewers, but c'mon: letting the viewers know what was going on could have been achieved in dialog or by having Spiner consistently do a gesture or other expression in a specific way that indicated he had connected.
I always thought they HAD WiFi, But Data himself was specifically designed to not have one. To make him as human as possible, and don't run the danger of a botnet taking Datas Server down or something like that... Basically so that the only people allowed to fiddle with his hard and Software are his creators, or people he trusts enough to put a Cable in his hard.
It doesn't make sense for data to even look at a screen, tap a keyboard, let alone talk to the computer when he can exchange info about a million times faster through a WIFI connection. In fact since we are in the far future it could as well be a million of millions times faster. Anyway, there are so many things that are wrong about Data that this is just a drop in a bucket.
Again: Data doesn't have a WiFi connection. The starship in Battlestar Galactica doesn't have one, either. For obvious reasons, that were in-depth explained in the series. In both universes an equivalent to a WiFi connection does exist though. It makes sense that Data doesn't have a wifi-connection. YOu can't get a computer virus just by scrolling through text. Access Wifi? Who seriously wants an advanced, sentient A.I. with top-secret military knowledge connected to the Internet?
Now if he were a product of starfleet, he probably would have a connection to the starfleet internal Intranet. But he was constructed privately, by a guy who was a genious, but had no access to military data connections. So he decided Data should only have a hardware connection. Pretty straightforward if you ask me.
This is true - unless there is a big societal revolt against monitoring systems, every single thing that happens on a Starship should be monitored in 360 degree hi def - very similar, in fact, to the image that Kirk manipulates in Into Darkness. They don't even need cameras, they have sensors that can detect neutrinos, and all sorts of intricate details - they should be able to faithfully recreate something that happened in corridor 34 beta just prior to the mysterious event that is crucial to the plot. Down to detecting what was said by the sound waves. But of course Trek's sensors were always only as effective as the plot required.Security cameras, and I mean absolutely everywhere.
Every intercom in TOS would have a camera. Those black panels along the TNG corridors would be one big monitoring system.
This is true - unless there is a big societal revolt against monitoring systems, every single thing that happens on a Starship should be monitored in 360 degree hi def - very similar, in fact, to the image that Kirk manipulates in Into Darkness. They don't even need cameras, they have sensors that can detect neutrinos, and all sorts of intricate details - they should be able to faithfully recreate something that happened in corridor 34 beta just prior to the mysterious event that is crucial to the plot. Down to detecting what was said by the sound waves. But of course Trek's sensors were always only as effective as the plot required.
I always thought a lack of text based communication was quite dated. Understandably, people talking is better for drama, but these days so much more communication is written (well, typed) than it was when TNG was on the air that it seems strange they only ever seem to talk to each other. I don't use my phone to make voice calls much now.
I always thought a lack of text based communication was quite dated. Understandably, people talking is better for drama, but these days so much more communication is written (well, typed) than it was when TNG was on the air that it seems strange they only ever seem to talk to each other. I don't use my phone to make voice calls much now.
I still don't get why they need all these people walking around the ship with padds, (including Janeway herself once) or why they can't access all the controls from every console on the ship or why they need to tell the computer to "enhance the picture". Can't the computer show the picture as enhanced as possible immediately? All that seems silly to me given that when these episodes have been shot we had already much better ways to transmit information.
I always thought a lack of text based communication was quite dated.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.