Well that settles it. JJ is committing Hollywood suicide with this secrecy and Star Trek is going to hell in three frames of flaming handbasket.
The only thing about nuTrek I hate is that there are no novels to tide me over between movies.
Those books need to be liberated.
![]()
People being haters. Since the film is so hush hush, they can't can't possibly know if the film sucks, so, they're just making it up, probably with some stupid naive belief that JJ will "HAVE" to call their bluff, and prove the film doesn't suck by ending the Hush Hushthere are people even saying the film secrecy is over the top because the film sucks.
Who exactly is saying that? Some haters on livejournal?
No...it was trek fans who post comments on articles wriiten on trekmovie.com
Oh, cool, I'll still be able to see it on the ride (See my Signature)Well that settles it. JJ is committing Hollywood suicide with this secrecy and Star Trek is going to hell in three frames of flaming handbasket.
The only thing about nuTrek I hate is that there are no novels to tide me over between movies.
Those books need to be liberated.
![]()
Alan Dean Foster wrote a novel, Refugees, being the first novel. It was written in 2010, but yet to be published.
I'm hoping the trailer is seen with Skyfall.
By this time four years ago, it was still October; we'd just seen the very first substantial article about the movie only the day before, and our look at the first still photo of the new Enterprise wouldn't be until more than three weeks later.<snip>
SweEt heart your dead wrong....lets do a reality check shall we?
Reality check 1
The last time around was different as trek was coming back from the dead after the failure of nemesis and enterprise and if I remember correctly there was a trailer attached to quantum of solace which was released In November 2008. JJ’s Trek came out in may 2009.
So by this time 4 years ago, promotion had already begun for the first film.
There's not one thing here which suggests that beginning promotion for the Star Trek film earlier would guarantee greater success.Reality check 2
Commerical Sucess: I will kindly ask you to do more research on trek films. Trek film has never been a huge box office draw overseas and even USA with the exception of the 09 film and the Voyage home. Paramount wants to change that and believe me secrecy is not going to help it. It is best to start promoting the film early.
If you think am wrong look at Iron man 3, after the huge success of Avengers you would think iron man wouldn’t need all the publicity and promotion anymore. Unfortunately that has not been the case. the campaign for the film has already begun even the film's plotline is already out
Also look at the john carter and super 8. Their promotions were quite poor and that hurt both films Box office success.
This is all just rambling and baseless speculation; there's no reality here to check.Star Trek may go down that root if Paramount is not careful.
Reality Check 3
The only time secrecy works is when the studio does not want to promote the film early because they don’t want Film Critics reviewing the film.
Case in point another Paramount film called GI JOE. Botomline is Trek may be fun for us but to JJ and Paramount, it’s all about business and Trek needs all the publicity it can get if it is to become a huge success worldwide.
Next year is going to be crazy with films like Wolverine, Man of steel and Iron man 3. It will be sad if trek gets lost in the crowd as I strongly believe that TREK 2013 has a good chance of been the best film of next summer.....The best film of next summer that doesnt even get to be in the top five highest grossing film of the year 2013.
I hope that doesnt happen.
By this time four years ago, it was still October; we'd just seen the very first substantial article about the movie only the day before, and our look at the first still photo of the new Enterprise wouldn't be until more than three weeks later.<snip>
SweEt heart your dead wrong....lets do a reality check shall we?
Reality check 1
The last time around was different as trek was coming back from the dead after the failure of nemesis and enterprise and if I remember correctly there was a trailer attached to quantum of solace which was released In November 2008. JJ’s Trek came out in may 2009.
So by this time 4 years ago, promotion had already begun for the first film.
Reality: checked
There's not one thing here which suggests that beginning promotion for the Star Trek film earlier would guarantee greater success.Reality check 2
Commerical Sucess: I will kindly ask you to do more research on trek films. Trek film has never been a huge box office draw overseas and even USA with the exception of the 09 film and the Voyage home. Paramount wants to change that and believe me secrecy is not going to help it. It is best to start promoting the film early.
If you think am wrong look at Iron man 3, after the huge success of Avengers you would think iron man wouldn’t need all the publicity and promotion anymore. Unfortunately that has not been the case. the campaign for the film has already begun even the film's plotline is already out
Also look at the john carter and super 8. Their promotions were quite poor and that hurt both films Box office success.
You're not Paramount, and the people who are Paramount seem entirely willing to let Abrams make them another pile of money on the upcoming Trek film by doing things his way.
Iron Man 3 is Iron Man 3; it is not Star Trek and it is a Disney production besides.
Super 8 performed well with the promotion it got.
John Carter is another Disney entry, and was probably hurt more by production delays and personnel changes than anything; chances are it'll make up the shortfall anyway on cable showings, in DVD sales and in the international market.
Reality: checked
This is all just rambling and baseless speculation; there's no reality here to check.Star Trek may go down that root if Paramount is not careful.
Reality Check 3
The only time secrecy works is when the studio does not want to promote the film early because they don’t want Film Critics reviewing the film.
Case in point another Paramount film called GI JOE. Botomline is Trek may be fun for us but to JJ and Paramount, it’s all about business and Trek needs all the publicity it can get if it is to become a huge success worldwide.
Next year is going to be crazy with films like Wolverine, Man of steel and Iron man 3. It will be sad if trek gets lost in the crowd as I strongly believe that TREK 2013 has a good chance of been the best film of next summer.....The best film of next summer that doesnt even get to be in the top five highest grossing film of the year 2013.
I hope that doesnt happen.
Filing started in January, and I've followed this Forum pretty throughly since before that, and I remember a thread where someone "claimed they heard about Diva behavior and fights on set", never seen anything aside that claim in that single thread about that. Never seen anything about an interview with Quinto where he tried to distance his performance from the material he was given to work with.I'm aware of this notion that the film absolutely stinks, I think it came from an interview with Quinto where he allegedly tries to distance his performance from that of the material he was given to work with, there was also some reporting around diva like behaviour on set; can I source it? No, I just know I've read it. The same can be said for the talking up of Cumberbatch's performance rather than the wider footprint of the movie.
So I wonder if that's the real issue, the film absolutely stinks?
Got you covered on the "diva" item, which was discussed here previously:I'm aware of this notion that the film absolutely stinks, I think it came from an interview with Quinto where he allegedly tries to distance his performance from that of the material he was given to work with, there was also some reporting around diva like behaviour on set; can I source it? No, I just know I've read it. The same can be said for the talking up of Cumberbatch's performance rather than the wider footprint of the movie.
So I wonder if that's the real issue, the film absolutely stinks?
why do you think superman returns didn’t have a part 2?
I'm aware of this notion that the film absolutely stinks...
They cant do the same for trek because of JJ’s obsession with everything been tight lip . It could as well backfire on Paramount and hurt the film's commercial success.I can guarantee you that Joe Average - the person who's money will make up most of the movie's box office - doesn't know or care that there isn't a trailer yet for Star Trek. Nor does he care about the "over the top" secrecy being employed by JJ and his staff. Get a grip.
Got you covered on the "diva" item, which was discussed here previously:I'm aware of this notion that the film absolutely stinks, I think it came from an interview with Quinto where he allegedly tries to distance his performance from that of the material he was given to work with, there was also some reporting around diva like behaviour on set; can I source it? No, I just know I've read it. The same can be said for the talking up of Cumberbatch's performance rather than the wider footprint of the movie.
So I wonder if that's the real issue, the film absolutely stinks?
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/guess-who/war-star-trek-divas
(Note: The National Enquirer is a US-based trash tabloid with a decades-long tradition of inventing gossip about whichever celebrities or situations they figure will sell the most issues for that week.)
I'm not aware of any Quinto interview matching that description, though.
Transwarp Drive is dreaming. Some fans have been saying the whole trilogy will stink from the moment Bad Robot was announced as the production house. No news here.
If there's one thing I stand by in life, it's that there's no smoke without fire and that usually where you hear things, particularly from a number of sources, they usually come to pass one way or the other.
THE ANTI-CHRIST!!!!!!The overactive imagination of a few fans? Or a darker, deeper and more significant meaning?
If there's one thing I stand by in life, it's that there's no smoke without fire and that usually where you hear things, particularly from a number of sources, they usually come to pass one way or the other.
In that case everyone in Hollywood is both pregnant AND getting a divorce.
THE ANTI-CHRIST!!!!!!The overactive imagination of a few fans? Or a darker, deeper and more significant meaning?
Remember what they said about Spock in the original pilot. Foreshadowing baby!!!!
So where is your proof that Quinto was trying to distance himself from the material?
If you read it, it's out there. Show us.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.