That works too. I'll look at this way: it's good that we can get different things out of it.
Theory: Picard and Seven were or still are in a romantic relationship??
- Thread starter Unimatrix Q
- Start date
That works too. I'll look at this way: it's good that we can get different things out of it.
Seven and Wesley are the same age. Born 2348.
I suppose there are better reasons than ageism, that Wesley and Jean-Luc should not hook up.
I suppose there are better reasons than ageism, that Wesley and Jean-Luc should not hook up.
Not that I subscribe to this ludicrous idea of Picard and 7 having had a relationship, but what you describe is precisely why they might bond. They're different ages, raised in different eras. But they share a common experience unlike anything a human has been though (and come out the other side as human).
Seven was 16 going on 17, when Locutus was her husband, father and king.
Ditching her like that, must have stirred up some daddy issues.
Besides, Picard is a Borg celebrity.
Which makes the two of them getting together like Notting Hill or Music and Lyrics?
Ditching her like that, must have stirred up some daddy issues.
Besides, Picard is a Borg celebrity.
Which makes the two of them getting together like Notting Hill or Music and Lyrics?
In TNG Rasals Seven was 21, and Picard was 14.
Was that a better love connection?
Was that a better love connection?
Wow, you really ran off the tracks with that one.
Nobody, including me (and my comment was a joke) indicated that Sir Patrick was doing anything more than possibly "robbing the cradle", a very well known happenstance that has occurred throughout the ages between men and women (both ways).
How you got from that to the criminal act of abusing minors, speaks more to your apparent hangups about Kevin Spacey than what is actually being talked about in this thread.
Heh ...Keep 'em coming.
Perhaps this thread has come to the point of no good returns.
Time to say "Goodnight Gracy"?
Last edited:
There's a neural clone of Picard inside Seven of Nine from when he was assimilated at the Battle of Wolf 359.
They (and Famke Janssen) have identical hobbies and interests.
They have too much in common.
No surprises.
They (and Famke Janssen) have identical hobbies and interests.
They have too much in common.
No surprises.
I wouldn't know. I've never seen the ep.
I know I'm in the minority of fans, but this is why I wanted a Picard prequel featuring his adventures and service aboard the Stargazer. It would've been nice seeing him, Jack, and Beverly in action traveling to planets no one has gone before, making first contacts, and interacting w/the Klingons, Romulans, etc. The Federation has just avoided a war with the Klingons (alas with the cost of the destruction of the Enterprise-C), so late 2340s/early 2350s were very exciting times for Starfleet that could potentially being brought on screen.
Oh, please. Way to completely miss my point and turn it into nonsensical crap. Joke or not, your
implication was that Stewart was doing something abhorrent in his personal life that mirrored his fictional character, and I chose a similar example from another actor, and instead you decide to play armchair psychiatrist. Yeah, talk about “running off the tracks.”
But you’re right about one thing. This topic needs to die.
Last edited:
Now that they have Star Trek: Picard, I think they eventually will make a Stargazer Series, as a way to utilize Jean-Luc Picard after Patrick Stewart is no longer able to continue. It might be a long ways away but I can imagine them pushing Young Picard after PIC ends. If it works with Young Sheldon, why not?
My thoughts exactly. If it's not considered worthy to be screened at CBSAA, perhaps it can be outsourced to the CW Network? I bet they'll aged Picard down to look like he's in his late 20s to early 30s (with full hair) so it will appeal to a new generation of fans. Plus young Jack and Beverly and a few new characters to round up the cast.
Anyway, make it so!!
Last edited:
I didn't miss your point at all.Oh, please. Way to completely miss my point and turn it into nonsensical crap. Joke or not, your
implication was that Stewart was doing something bad in his personal life that mirrored his fictional character, and I chose a similar example from another actor, and instead you decide to play armchair psychiatrist. Yeah, talk about “running off the tracks.”
Your example came from way out of left field and is in no way any kind of comparison to the discussion at hand.
There's a Hell of a big difference between an elderly gentleman courting and/or marrying a much younger woman and a middle aged guy supposedly hitting on and having sex with young boys.
If you can't see the difference then I'm not really sure there's much sense in continuing this particular part of the conversation.
I didn't miss your point at all.
Your example came from way out of left field and is in no way any kind of comparison to the discussion at hand.
There's a Hell of a big difference between an elderly gentleman courting and/or marrying a much younger woman and a middle aged guy hitting on and having sex with young boys.
If you can't see the difference then I'm not really sure there's much sense in continuing.
And if all you’re going to do is harp on one part of my response without acknowledging my actual point that Stewart’s personal life isn’t the topic at hand, then by all means, let’s drop it.
Perhaps that's next in the bullpen after the young Kirk Kelvin films run their course?
Haven't they already run their course?Perhaps that's next in the bullpen after the young Kirk Kelvin films run their course?
I think the OP was centred on the fact that Picard and 7 had a relationship AFTER they were both back to human. However, that being said, supposed it happened while they were in the collective. Who ever said Borg care about human norms of relationship ages? If it's optimal for a 50 year old human-assimilant to bang an 18 year old human-assimilant to produce an efficient drone, who are they to argue?
Similar threads
