That was also something I considered as well. Ultimately we learned in "The Name of the Doctor" that he chose the name the Doctor and that it meant something that wartime incarnation chose not to uphold.
"Look, my name--my real name--that is not the point. The name I chose is 'the Doctor.' The name you choose, it's like, it's like a promise you make...he's the one who broke the promise."
--The Eleventh Doctor
I don't quite see it that way. It was the eighth Doctor who chose to give up being the Doctor by taking the Sisterhood of Karn's potion to make his next regeneration a warrior. The War Doctor had to live his life with the consequences of the eighth Doctor's decision. He didn't fail to uphold the name of the Doctor; his previous incarnation, rather, took it away from him before he was even born.
But then you have to look at it that it was the War Doctor's choice to
stay that way. We've seen Doctors have an immediate change of heart about things after a regeneration, so that incarnation could have indeed walked away from it or at least not have it dominate that entire incarnation.
Of course, there's the oddity that for hundreds of years (since we see that the War Doctor aged significantly between his birth and death) everyone but the Doctor referred to the War Doctor "the Doctor" -- the Daleks, the Time Lord Council, etc. How the War Doctor was referred to doesn't stand up to a lot of scrutiny.
I have to disagree with that. If that incarnation didn't call himself the Doctor--indeed,
rejected the name of the Doctor--then what a few others (it definitely
wasn't everyone as it really only extended to the Daleks and the Time Lord Council) called him doesn't matter. Even
after "Day of the Doctor," the Eleventh Doctor acknowledged that he wasn't the Doctor during that time and that Tennant's Doctor was still the Tenth Doctor.
"I didn't call myself the Doctor during the Time War..."
--the Eleventh Doctor, "Time of the Doctor"
Sure, the War Doctor is still an incarnation of the Doctor, but one that didn't go by that name.
Alidar Jarok said:
C.E. Evans said:
Alidar Jarok said:
C.E. Evans said:
Doesn't matter when it comes to toys that have been marketed with children also in mind.
Something similar was done for toys based on the movie Kick-Ass 2 in the States. Those sold in Toys R Us stores were rebranded a more family-friendly "KA 2."
Well,
that is stupid.
Not really when you consider the very sensitive (i.e. whining) times we live in. As parents often take children into Toys R Us stores, it's more likely that certain parents (and you know the certain ones I'm referring to) would be greatly offended seeing a toy with "Ass" proudly displayed on its packaging, start a big fuss, and then start organizing a nationwide boycott against Toys R Us for not being family-friendly. It's actually wise for TRU to head that kind of stuff off before it happens, IMO.
Sorry, I should have been more specific.
It's stupid that they're selling Kick Ass toys at Toys R Us.
It's not a kids movie. They shouldn't have to be placed in the situation where kids might be buying the toys but be corrupted by the name of the thing they're buying.
Most Toys R Us stores have an aisle dedicated towards TV, movie, & video game collectibles, and while a
few of them are based on adult-oriented action/adventure properties, it'd be hard to tell at a glance. But having a toy with an objectionable word
on the packaging would be an instant giveaway, though.