Shot him in the leg. A head shot might have led to him not being as attractive to the zombies.
Why? Sushi?
Shot him in the leg. A head shot might have led to him not being as attractive to the zombies.
Unfortunately, I do not. It was just a quote they threw up on the screen. I'll go back to my tape and see if they give a reference and post it tonight if they do.Any idea which tablet or column? Or when in the story, approximately? You got me hauling out my copy of it.
And speaking of Shane cutting his hair, all I could think of is how he was wasting water by leaving the shower running.
Fresh bread, hot water, that farmhouse doesn't seem to be lacking for anything.
Yeah, the picture quality was rather bad this week on my end too. At first I thought I had accidentally recorded the SD channel.Anyone find the picture quality kind of lousy? I actually checked to make sure my TV didn't go into some odd picture mode.
On first thought this seemed possible (perhaps the instinct is to only eat food they've killed), but it doesn't seem like it would track with the guy who hanged himself.Shot him in the leg. A head shot might have led to him not being as attractive to the zombies.
That was what I initially expected when Shane showed back up at the farm without Otis, and would've felt more or less in line with what little we knew about the television version of the character. But, yeah, it was definitely a more dramatically interesting decision to have him betrayed by Shane.They could've actually gone the 'easy' way out and have Otis be the 'hero' by sacrificing himself for the boy. It was an interesting decision to have it be decided for him by Shane. Definitely a WTF moment.
I'd assume they simply didn't say anything to her, and allowed her to assume Otis was outside with the others. She did stay in the room with Carl, after all, preparing him for the surgery when Shane returned, and I would assume Herschel went right to work when he went back inside.What did they tell whatsherface when Shane got back without Otis? Did she just assume he was there or did they lie about his whereabouts? Something about that part didn't ring true.
If they incorporate a point from the comics (and there's been some foreshadowing on this front, or at least I've taken it as such), then I think a very good reason will present itself in the next episode or so.Last night I thought... Why don't they just stay there?
If they incorporate a point from the comics (and there's been some foreshadowing on this front, or at least I've taken it as such), then I think a very good reason will present itself in the next episode or so.Last night I thought... Why don't they just stay there?
On first thought this seemed possible (perhaps the instinct is to only eat food they've killed), but it doesn't seem like it would track with the guy who hanged himself.Shot him in the leg. A head shot might have led to him not being as attractive to the zombies.
So he was eaten sometime after he hanged himself but before he zombied? That doesn't sound right on timing either.
Ah, for some reason I didn't think about it from the most obvious perspective... Yes, that's an incredibly good point.
Also, for anyone who is interested in comparisons and contrasts with the comics: Otis did not die nearly this quickly after his introduction, nor through betrayal, in the comics. He was with the group for a decent amount of time before meeting his end.
That was what I initially expected when Shane showed back up at the farm without Otis, and would've felt more or less in line with what little we knew about the television version of the character. But, yeah, it was definitely a more dramatically interesting decision to have him betrayed by Shane.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.