• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers The Strange New Worlds Starship Thread™

There was an old issue of Starlog in the early '90s where the background of the table-of-contents was a painting of the TOS Enterprise chasing a Bird of Prey. I think it might've been part of an article on David Mattingly, but I'm having trouble tracking down the image on-line (for that matter, I had trouble tracking down another image I remembered from the article to get his name).

Ha! Found it. An old example of the idea of the movie-style Bird of Prey being around in the TOS era.

488220847_1192049832732770_6392090806043687560_n.jpg
 
the one here like Jörg observes is slightly different from the B'Rel in WOK onwards. Like from what I can see it's missing the black grills near the impulse deck.
 
View attachment 48194

Why that BoP wing got a dart board on it? ;)
I mean, that’s how it looked in the other series

 
There's a nice closeup of a cutaway of the Enterprise's secondary hull in Episode 6

YMa7q5Z.png


Here's a comparison with the Franz Joseph blueprints for the TOS version. the turbolift layout is similar, so they may have used it as a basis.

h8b9hrt.png
 
I mean, that’s how it looked in the other series

A ;) is often used to denote that a statement is not altogether sincere.
 
Now they just need to make the Excelsior bigger.
I've been saying this for a while. If we increase the size of all the TOS and TOS movie ships (including the Constellation class) to scale with a 442m Constitution class it matches the interiors in the movies better, matches the early effects from TNG, removes the huge size jump from the Ent B to the Ent C and then makes the Sovereign class the perfect size to be a replacement for the Excelsior class as they aged out of service. (The Excelsior II class from Pic could be a simpler and easier to build replacement to complement the Sovereign and make up for losses in the Dominion war).

A quick calculation makes the Excelsior 723m at the new scale, compared with a Sovereign at 685m That would work, the internal dimensions of the Excelsior are still smaller than a Galaxy, and probably an Ambassador.
 
Last edited:
I've been saying this for a while. If we increase the size of all the TOS and TOS movie ships (including the Constellation class) to scale with a 442m Constitution class it matches the interiors in the movies better, matches the early effects from TNG, removes the huge size jump from the Ent B to the Ent C and then makes the Sovereign class the perfect size to be a replacement for the Excelsior class as they aged out of service. (The Excelsior II class from Pic could be a simpler and easier to build replacement to complement the Sovereign and make up for losses in the Dominion war).

A quick calculation makes the Excelsior 723m at the new scale, compared with a Sovereign at 685m That would work, the internal dimensions of the Excelsior are still smaller than a Galaxy, and probably an Ambassador.
But by that same logic, every StarShip down the time-line in this SNW Time-line will get scaled up proportionally.
 
I've been saying this for a while. If we increase the size of all the TOS and TOS movie ships (including the Constellation class) to scale with a 442m Constitution class it matches the interiors in the movies better, matches the early effects from TNG, removes the huge size jump from the Ent B to the Ent C and then makes the Sovereign class the perfect size to be a replacement for the Excelsior class as they aged out of service. (The Excelsior II class from Pic could be a simpler and easier to build replacement to complement the Sovereign and make up for losses in the Dominion war).

A quick calculation makes the Excelsior 723m at the new scale, compared with a Sovereign at 685m That would work, the internal dimensions of the Excelsior are still smaller than a Galaxy, and probably an Ambassador.

Most of the Sovereign is nacelle anyway. At only 24-29 decks..the E-E was always intended to be a *much* smaller ship than the Enterprise-D and even, in volume, likely the E-C.
 
I've been saying this for a while. If we increase the size of all the TOS and TOS movie ships (including the Constellation class) to scale with a 442m Constitution class it matches the interiors in the movies better, matches the early effects from TNG, removes the huge size jump from the Ent B to the Ent C and then makes the Sovereign class the perfect size to be a replacement for the Excelsior class as they aged out of service. (The Excelsior II class from Pic could be a simpler and easier to build replacement to complement the Sovereign and make up for losses in the Dominion war).

A quick calculation makes the Excelsior 723m at the new scale, compared with a Sovereign at 685m That would work, the internal dimensions of the Excelsior are still smaller than a Galaxy, and probably an Ambassador.

I think the problem stemmed from the original ILM scale chart made for STIII. All of the ships on that chart were scaled too small IMHO, but that’s what ended up being used as the ‘official’ scale in licensed publications like the Star Trek Encyclopedia.

Also, I think TPTB just wanted each successive Enterprise to be larger and longer than its predecessor, but that simply doesn’t work with the Excelsior when you really try to determine its scale based on the model’s attributes.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top